Evolution: Possible or Impossible? by James F. CoppedgeBest book on creation/evolution very convincing about ID.
View all my reviews
Saturday, June 9, 2012
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
FAITHLESS AND UNBELIEVING.
Alfred Bielek was born on August 4, 1916 as Edward A. Cameron II, son of Alexander Duncan Cameron, Sr.
His father (Alexander Duncan Cameron, Sr.) enlisted in the U.S. Navy prior to the U.S. entry into World War 1. He sired him and later A. Duncan Cameron, Jr. (May 1917), by different mothers. First you will read Alls account of the years leading up to the "Philadelphia Experiment. " Then, for the first time in any magazine, Al shares further information on other, less known experiments that continue to this day. Experiments that took place, and apparently, still do, at Montauk, Long Island.
In September of 1939, both Duncan and Baliek enlisted in the U.S. Navy-taking commissions as Lt. (J.G.) and then attending a 90-day training school for "Special Assignment" Navy personnel at Providence, Rhode Island.
With completion of training, They were both assigned to the Institute of Advanced Study (Princeton, N.J.) and directly to the ongoing "Project Invisibility."
In January 1941, they were sent to sea for sea duty on the U.S.S. Pennsylvania. We toured the Pacific until October 194 1, when the Pennsylvania was put in dry dock at Pearl Harbor. After taking leave in San Francisco and remaining there through December 1941, were returned to the Institute early in January 1942. We worked on the project through 1942-Nikola Tesla dropped out in March 1942, and Dr. John Von Neumann took over at that time With the return of his memories, in May 1986, of the Phoenix Project and of the Philadelphia Experiment (Project Rainbow) in January 1988, 1 have engaged in extensive lecturing and writing on the subject of The Philadelphia Experiment, its ramifications and the follow-on Project Phoenix, and the incredible consequences of the lockup through time. In 1943 came the Philadelphia Experiment and the lock-up with the Phoenix Project, ripping a huge hole in space-time. This was deliberately done by the aliens at the '83 end to put a rift in the fabric of space-time so large numbers of aliens and ships could come through. They all had time travel capabilities, but the rift was needed to get the large ships through and make a mass invasion of the United States, and later Europe, of aliens (primarily greys) and other types. When they landed at Edwards Air Force Base in the Muroc Dry Lake as well as another air baseI'm leaving a lot of details out-the government already knew all about the aliens being on this planet. [They knew] since 1887 with the first investigating commission under Grover Cleveland.
In any case, they knew that they were here, but then they came en masse. We were confronted by a technology that we couldn't counter, we couldn't handle it, we didn't know what to do about it. So the agreement with Eisenhower and his advisors was to sign a treaty with them, a noninterference treaty and get what technology we could from them-make some kind of agreement. We'd buy time and see what we could do about it later.
That was the basis of the agreement Because of that, very large numbers of aliens came in and eventually became part of the Phoenix Project. They were planning ahead. We didn't know what they were up to. And I'm looking at this in retrospect, not what we knew then. They were planning ahead. They knew what they were doing. They maneuvered and manipulated the Phoenix Project. They did not expect it to crash then. I am sure they anticipate its continuing for another decade, at least into the '90's.
In July 1943, the destroyer U.S.S. Eldridge pulled into the Delaware Bay area for a United States Naval experiment that involved the task of making the ship invisible. The project's official name is Project Rainbow, but was nicknamed and more commonly known as the Philadelphia Experiment.
Much has been written and speculated about the legendary experiment into invisibility, but sorting fact from fiction is a near impossible task, especially with the recent influx of misinformation and deliberate disinformation that has been spread by those connected to the U.S. Intelligence community and professional skeptics.
There is much controversy over what exactly happened, but one thing is for sure. For some reason, soon after the test was completed, a massive blanket of secrecy and denial was placed over what happened in Delaware Bay. It is thought that a huge scientific breakthrough was made, and the ship was accurately transported over space and time, disappearing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and reappearing in Norfolk, Virginia. Whatever did happen is still not known, but different theories are discussed below:
The "Official" Navy Record
The Navy admits that the U.S.S. Eldridge took part in an experiment that involved wrapping wire around the hull of the destroyer in an attempt to cancel out the magnetic fields of the metal on the ship. This is known as degaussing. This would render the ship "invisible" to underwater magnetic mines that rely on proximity sensors to trigger the detonation. These sensors operate by detecting magnetic fields around ships. Without the magnetic field, the ship would be able to pass through regions mined with these sensors, invisible to enemy mines, but not to radar or vision.
The Navy's report is very plausible, and doesn't mention any exotic results or circumstances. But could this just be a believable account to drop the interest by the general public, leaving only the true minority of investigators in doubt?
Physical Invisibility
Some scientists have developed the theory that the Navy was working on a way to make the ship invisible to vision. However, it didn't involve warping space time or any complex task of a similar nature. This theory suggests that the Eldridge was equipped with high frequency generators that would heat up the surrounding air to cause a mirage, making the vessel invisible.
This phenomenon is naturally occurring, and there have been cases where entire islands have disappeared from view in the right weather conditions. The high frequency generator would heat up the surrounding air and the water (creating a green-colored fog that was said to have engulfed the ship), causing a mirage to form, concealing the ship from view.
The generator would also account for the sickness (physical and mental) of the crew after the experiment. A high frequency generator can cause serious harm to a person's wellbeing, especially at close range. This is more plausible than the degaussing theory, and would also explain the crew's sick condition as a result of the test.
The main problem with these theories though, is that it doesn't explain how the U.S.S. Eldridge was seen in Norfolk, Virginia by the civilian crew of the SS Andrew Furuseth, when the ship disappeared from view in Philadelphia in a space of only about fifteen minutes. There are also details such as crewmen being fused to the hull of the ship and some not even reappearing.
Transported across space and time?
The most interesting theory about the Philadelphia Experiment is that the destroyer did in fact disappear and was teleported across space and time. Supposedly, there was a great number of ingenious scientists (including Tesla and Einstein) that were taking part in the experiment. However, Nikola Tesla was supposed to dead at the time of the Naval experiment.
The theory is that light has to be bent around the ship to make it invisible. To accomplish this, the Navy wrapped the ship's circumference in wire and passed a measured current through it. This caused a huge oscillating magnet to form a magnetic field around the ship, not only bending the light, but space and time as well. The physics of the experiment are reminiscent of Einstein's Unified Field Theory that once you bend light, you are also unwittingly bending space and time as well.
The first time this experiment was undertaken, the ship didn't completely disappear, and an imprint of the hull could be seen sitting in the water. The second time, the ship totally disappeared in a green fog and was sighted in Norfolk, Virginia.
A haunting fact is that when the ship reappeared, the crew were all in a state of disorientation. Some were mentally ill, while other crewmen didn't even return. There were also crewmen that returned embedded in the hull. Later accounts arose about the crewmen, including a former crew member who was involved in a bar fight, and all the participants froze in time, as reported by a local newspaper! There were also accounts of people who were on the ship, spontaneously combusting.
The mystery remains
It is still not known what happened that day in 1943, mainly due to the lack of witnesses coming forth who served aboard the Eldridge. There is also no documentation available to the public which details Project Rainbow. It may have simply been a degaussing experiment. But how did the destroyer appear seconds later in Virginia? Its possible the answer will never be known, but the mystery may be solved when scientists rediscover what happened in Delaware Bay.
In 1988, Al started to recover fragmented memories of his involvement in the Philadelphia Experiment after seeing a late night TV airing of the 1984 movie, The Philadelphia Experiment. Because of Al's involvement with the Philadelphia Experiment, the Montauk Project, and other secret, black budget programs, he's been subjected to brain washing (as have all personnel connected with these projects), with the goal of eliminating from his conscious mind all memories of his involvement. "Memories" can be created, changed, or wiped completely when you are subjected to mind control. Does that mean that Al's information may not be 100% accurate? Perhaps, but I feel strongly that the overwhelming bulk of information that Al has relayed over the years is accurate and has occurred as he has revealed it. Selected memories may have been distorted or 'inserted' into Al's mind ( he would have no way of knowing ) for disinformation purposes, but to dismiss it out of hand is foolish. Al had discovered that if both hemispheres of the brain are in balance or in 'sync', then mind control access/manipulation by mind control programmers is thwarted. He explains in his autobiography tapes a couple of methods for balancing the left brain and the right brain to achieve this balanced state.
Al Bielek and Phil Schneider have been two of the very best sources we have had to reveal highly secret information about the black projects of the American government. (People have often asked Al why he hasn't been killed if his information is so good. He tells them that he and brother Duncan have something of a protected status because their bodies are locked in with the time experiments of Montauk and that the earth needs to complete a biorhythm stabilization cycle that converges on Aug. 12, 2003. That stabilization is somehow locked in with Al and Duncan's bodies. Al already found out that he cannot be arrested when he was taken into custody after being discovered on a clandestine inspection of the Montauk base in the early 1990's.)
1991 Interview with Al Bielek
This 1991 interview took place in Yelm, Washington between Al Bielek and unnamed reporters working for The Sovereign Scribe of McKenna, Washington. Al recounts how he and his brother Duncan were transported by a Time Tunnel machine located at Montauk, Long Island into the interior of an underground facility on Mars in the late 70's. The United States, possibly Russia, and certain aliens already had bases established on the surface of Mars in 1969 in keeping with the provisions of an agreement between the aliens and the US called Alternative 3. The US personnel on the ground, however, couldn't gain access to these interior Martian facilities because they lacked the heavy equipment needed to force an entry. Possessing advanced computers and exact positioning coordinates for Mars, the Time-Space tunnel machine set up at Montauk could place Al and his brother at any location on or inside the planet to within a few inches of computer coordinates. Al and Duncan made many authorized trips to Mars with the Time Tunnel and two "unauthorized" trips on their own in which they were later discovered and taken off the Mars time tunnel project.
1997 Interview with Al Bielek Part 1 & 2
Kenneth Burke of Leading Edge Newspaper interviewed Al Bielek at the Global Sciences Congress, Daytona Beach, Florida in August 1997. A highly revealing interview. Covers many important topics.
Al's 1992 Video on Mind Control with Vladimir Terziski
Al Bielek made at least two underground videos with Valdimir Terziski. The first one covered the Philadelphia Experiment in depth and this second video went into the mind control aspects of the Montauk Project, which included both trauma-based mind control of the "Montauk Boys" and the development of microwave electronic mind control that is now being implemented worldwide. You can read a brief summary of this video on the Products page by clicking the above link.
The 2003 Al Bielek Debunking Campaign
July 22, 2003. A new campaign to debunk Al Bielek got kicked off on the internet somewhere in late Spring of this year. I've been sent e-mails by two relatively unknown individuals who are anxious to have me review their debunking allegations against Al. I haven't responded to them yet, but a third individual said to be associated with this current debunking effort is better known; his name is Marshall Barnes. Barnes has previously spoken supportively of the Philadelphia Experiment (and Al Bielek) on the radio, so one has to wonder what's going on there. This is not the first time a campaign has been launched to discredit the Philadelphia Experiment story. The late Jacques Vallee attempted to do just that in 1994 with an article titled: Anatomy of a Hoax: The Philadelphia Experiment 50 Years Later which appeared in the Journal of Scientific Exploration. I guess it might have held sway at least with the casual reader, had it not been thoroughly demolished and shown to be a disinfo piece in an article titled: Debunking The Philadelphia Experiment Debunkers which appeared on December 6, 2001 at www.rense.com. One has to wonder if Al's unexpected sleuthing and resultant discovery of the HIDDEN FILES embedded within the CDs mentioned above could have had anything to do with this latest discrediting effort, or if Al's more recent radio interviews discussing information about worldwide electronic mind control using microwave "cell phone" towers has anything to do with it. Regardless of the reason, Al says that one doesn't have to scratch very deep beneath the surface to find the hidden hand of Naval Intelligence at work when it comes to undermining his credibility or the reality of the entire Philadelphia Experiment saga.
According to his own records, Bielek has been on over 50 radio talk shows and a featured speaker at over 40 conferences. We will outline in the body of our presentation the following re-evaluation of Al Bielek.
· He never participated in the PX
· He never witnessed the PX
· He was no where near the PX test when it occurred
· He has changed the nature of his story many times over the years with additions, embellishments, deletions and wholesale fabrication of events
· He has stated historical events that can be completely verified to be totally false
These points are a sampling of what we will present in our report.
That remains amazing is that Bielek's story was widely accepted by the media and his 'fan community' without criticism. People of all backgrounds were quick to repeat his quotes, often just borrowing them from someone else's web page, without checking the claims or presenting any critical analysis of whether they 'could' be true. The most astute observer and researcher of the PX is Marshall Barnes. He has been doing a thorough investigation of the Philadelphia Experiment since the early '90's. Barnes asked basic questions that no one else thought pertinent and with time he began to find great discrepancies with Bielek's claims. Starting from a basic dissatisfaction with Bielek's so called "facts", observing that not one claim was supported by a "hard evidence" [which means that it can be verified] Marshall began a large-scale investigation. Eventually a small number of people joined Marshall in his endeavors and the result of this long-term research is this report.
Among this group of researchers were Marshall Barnes (USA), Fred Houpt (CAN) and Gerold Schelm (GER), making this investigation a real international event. Our group effort can demonstrate that the claims of Al Bielek and his companions is nothing short of very impressive media manipulation, dis-information, partially correct data mixed into fabrications and completely false statements. Where there will always be those of the opinion that Bielek's media circus is the creation of a government-guided operation, what we can say with certainty is that to some degree it has been a profitable venture for Bielek and friends. Whether they were selling hokum and malarkey never seemed to stop the curious and naïve from buying tapes and videos and attending conferences.
The fact is that the one factor missing for over a decade, is a step by step de-construction of the PX-Bielek saga as it was told by Al Bielek. We have accomplished that and we are confident that his version, his story, does not hold up to severe scrutiny. The references used for this presentation are the common transcripts of some speeches and interviews given by Al Bielek, which are still accessible on the internet. Additionally, we make reference to the content of Al Bielek's own web site, www.bielek.com, which has presented the photo material referred to in this report. Often, we use Al Bielek's own data to point out where he has either lied, mixed and matched bits and pieces of the real story or else just made up a great deal of nonsense. When we say that someone has 'lied', we are required to show evidence for the accusation. We have documentary evidence showing Bielek lying on several of the main subjects and the source is emails and official documents, which we have provided as part of the report.
PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT.:-
The Philadelphia experiment originally began back in the 1930's in Chicago with three people. Dr. John Hutchinson Sr., who was the Dean of the University of Chicago, Nickola Tesla, and Dr. Kurtenaur, who was an Austrian physicist who was on staff at the University. They decided to do something with the speculation regarding the concept of things and people being invisible. This subject had been discussed for several year. They got together and did some research at the University of Chicago around 1931 or 1932. In 1933 the Institute of Advanced Studies at Princeton was formed and the project was transferred there in 1934. One of the people on staff at the Institute was Dr. John Erich Von Neumann, who was from Budapest Hungary. He got his degree in chemistry in 1925 and his Ph.D. in mathematics in 1926. He taught in Europe for about four years and transferred to the United States. He taught at the graduate level for three years and was invited to join the Institute.
Other people at the Institute included Albert Einstein, who left Germany in 1930. He went to the California Institute of Technology for three years and taught there and then went to the Institute upon their invitation and acceptance. A lot of other people showed up there as time went on. The project expanded about 1936. In the meantime, Tesla was named director of the project. He was a friend of president Franklin Roosevelt, whom Tesla met in 1917 when FDR was secretary of the Navy.
Tesla was asked at that time to do some work for the government for the war effort, which he did. He accepted and became director of the invisibility project until he resigned in 1942. In 1936, after intensive study, they decided to have an initial test of their work. They achieved some partial invisibility. The Navy and everyone else was encouraged to continue the work, and the Navy supplied money for research.
Scientists were coming to the United States from Germany until 1939, when the war with Germany was started.
In 1940, after research using Tesla's approach, they decided they were ready for a full test at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. They had a small ship and a tender ship at each side. One ship provided the power and the other supplied the drive for the coils. They were tendered to the test ship by cables. The idea was that if anything went wrong they could cut the cables or sink the test ship. Everything worked and the project was declared a success.
The important point about the 1940 test is that there was no one on board the test vehicle. It was strictly a dry run with no people. This is important because of what happened later. Other people came on board. Thomas T. Brown joined the project because of his expertise in electro gravity effects. He had the task of solving the problem of the German magnetic mines that were affecting allied shipping and Naval efforts. This led into a parallel project which involved the use of disguising coils and cables to explode the mines at a distance from the ship.
The Navy wanted several people to keep an eye on the tests. That is how I got involved. Keeping technical commentaries. Let's look at Nickola Tesla.
In 1879 his father died and his first year at college ended. He came to the United States in1884. He had enormously intuitive insight. He had a perfect track record. Before coming to the US he had known Robert Oppenheimer, who later worked with the development of the atomic bomb, and Dr. David Hilbert, the mathematician who devised equations for Hilbert Space, which described multiple space or multiple realities mathematically.
These equations for multiple space became very important in the project. Dr. von Neumann met Hilbert in 1927 and retained a lot of what he had learned. With that, Von Neumann developed other new systems of mathematics. Von Neumann was considered to be one of the most outstanding mathematicians in this century. Some think he was better than Einstein. Another mathematician involved was Dr. John Levinson, who was born in 1912. He died in 1976. He published three books on mathematics. Levinson developed the so-called Levinson Time Equations. with all this behind them, the group had all they needed to proceed with the project.
After the successful 1940 test, the Navy decided to give the project unlimited funds and to classify the project. In 1942 Tesla was given a ship and a crew for a full sized test. Tesla got a battleship. Tesla and Von Neumann didn't agree on some things. Tesla insisted that they were going to have a very severe problem with personnel. Tesla wanted more time but the NAVY wouldn't agree. Tesla made periodic announcements in the late 1930's and early 1940's about his contact with off planet species. He was in contact with the outside, who agreed that there was a problem with the people. He decided to sabotage the 1942 test in an attempt to stop the project. He de-tuned the equipment so nothing would work. The test failed. Tesla then turned the project over to Von Neumann in March 1942 and left the project.
Von Neumann went to the Navy and requested time to study the problem to determine what had gone wrong. Von Neumann decided to make changes in some of the equipment. He decided he would need a special ship that was designed from the ground up. The Eldridge was selected. The equipment was built into the ship. They put all the equipment on the ship. October 1942 arrived. They selected 33 volunteers for the crew, who arrived after graduation in December 1942.
After the ship was out of drydock work began. In May of 1943 von Neumann installed a third generator. It would never synchronize with the other two. It went out of control one day and zapped one of the men. Von Neumann pulled out the third generator (installed because Tesla had convinced Von Neumann of the potential problem with people) and went back to the original design. In mid June, the ship had sea trials. On July 22, 1943, they had the test. The ship between radar and optically invisible. They discovered people very disoriented. The Navy pulled the crew off and consulted Von Neumann, who requested more time again from the Navy. The Navy, after consultation with higher-ups, announced that the drop dead date was on the 12th of August, 1943. Von Neumann voiced his concern that it wasn't enough time.
The Navy decided that it just wanted radar invisibility and not optical invisibility. The equipment was again modified by Von Neumann. August 12th arrived. We knew things were not right. The test began, and for about a minute everything was all right. The ships outline could be seen in the water. There was suddenly a blue flash and the ship disappeared entirely. No radio communication was possible. It was gone. In about three hours it came back. One of the masts was broken.
Some personnel were partially embedded in the steel deck. Others were fading in and out. Some disappeared entirely. Many were insane. The Navy extracted the crew and proceeded with four days of meetings to decided what to do about the problem. They decided there would be one more test with another dry run without personnel. They conducted the dry run using about 1000 feet of cable attached to another ship. In late October 1943 the test occurred. The ship disappeared for about 20 minutes. When it returned, they found equipment missing. Two transmitter cabinets and one generator was missing. The cabinet with the zero-time reference generator was intact. At that point, the Navy stripped the ship and stopped the project. The Eldridge served in the war and was turned over to Greece at the end of the war.
The important thing is that there were two tests that were exactly 40 years apart to the day. It was a 40 year separation in hyperspace. Now, the Earth itself has a biorhythm that peaks on a 20 year cycle on August 12th. It "just happened" to peak and provided the connecting link through the fields of the Earth for the two experiments to lock up in hyperspace. Walk-in efforts are aided if they occur during this peak.
The ship was pulled into hyperspace. We were inside the ship and knew something was drastically wrong with the test. We tried to shut it off but it wouldn't shut off. We ran out on deck and jumped over the side of the ship. We jumped overboard but ended up in a time tunnel which ended at Montauk, Long Island on August 12th, 1983. At night.
We were found very quickly and taken down stairs, where Von Neumann greeted us. He expected us. It was a bit of a shock. We had just been in 1943 and now we were in 1983 looking at Von Neumann as an old man. He said that there was a hyperspace lockup and that we had to go back and shut off the generators on the ship or the hyperspace rift would keep increasing and possibly engulf the planet. He had been waiting 40 years for us to arrive.
Montauk sent us back and we smashed the equipment with axes. The ship returned to its original point in space and about three hours later in time. From 1943 on, Von Neumann didn't know what happened. He had modified earlier equipment in 1943 to where he had a full blown time machine. The Germans also were working on time travel, and had it working in 1945 just before the end of the war. This is all a matter of record.
They spent the first ten years from about 1969 to about 1979, researching pure mind control.
The first part of the mind control project was to take an individual and stand them about 250 feet away from the antenna. The SAGE radar had a peak pulse power of .5 MW. The antenna had a gain of 30db. That means an effective radiated power of at least a gigawatt. It was nominally a gigawatt. Can you imagine what that would do to people? Some think its amazing these people are still here. It does things like burn out brain functions, create neurological damage, scar lungs from heat, etc. They tried this with a number of people and there were few survivors. The subjects were often indigent people they grabbed off the streets.
The project was controlled by Dr. John Von Neumann and Jack Pruett. About 30 people worked there. It was a joint project...Air Force & Navy. Original funding came from the Nazi government funds. In 1944 there was an American troop train that went through a French railroad tunnel carrying $10 billion in Nazi gold which they had found.
It was $10 billion at the 1944 price of $20 per ounce. The train was blown up in the tunnel. It killed 51 American soldiers. The gold turned up ten years later at Montauk. This has been verified. That money was used to finance the project for many years as the value of gold went up.
They spent all of it and ran out of money. That's when they tapped on ITT, who funded it. ITT was owned by Krupp in Germany. In terms of personnel, many of the civilians and scientists there were all ex-Nazi's who came from Germany both before and after the war ended.
The project was under US Government surveillance. The intelligence community knew what was going on and the CIA monitored everything, as did other government intelligence agencies. The field of players who actually operated on the base was small, between 30 and 50.
The funding was entirely private. After 1983, Senator Goldwater found out about it and started an investigation. He couldn't find any trace of government funding. Pruett was the metaphysical director of the project. He was Air Force. After he left Dr. Herman C. Untermann took over. They had an electronics expert, Dr. Mathew E. Zerrett, who came over from Germany in 1946 with Werhner von Braun. Probably the reason that they ran out of money is that they had a total of 25 bases around the United States to support. The last of the bases shut down August 12, 1983. The base at Montauk, where all the stations got their zero-time reference from, shut down and the other two remaining bases went down with it.
Other experiments included time travel. No one has picked up a tangible future beyond 2012 AD. There is a very abrupt wall there with nothing on the other side. A working time vortex was created to the future.
At one point a creature came through and everyone went into a panic. They shut the transmitter off. The creature ate people and equipment. They had to go back and shut down the unit in Philadelphia in order to shut off the unit in the future so they could stop this creature in 1983. This was on August 12,1983. The vortex locked on to the 12 August 1943 test and formed a loop.
GOVERNMENT COVERUP TO PX :-
The Philadelphia experiment is an alleged United States Navy experiment (Project Rainbow) done on October 28, 1943. According to legend, the destroyer USS Eldridge was made invisible, dematerialized, and teleported from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Norfolk, Virginia, and back again to the Philadelphia Naval Yard. The experiment allegedly had such terrible side effects, such as making sailors invisible and causing them to go mad, that the Navy quit exploring this exciting new technology.
The experiment was allegedly done by Dr. Franklin Reno as an application of Einstein's unified field theory. The experiment supposedly demonstrated a successful connection between gravity and electromagnetism: electromagnetic space-time warping
The Navy denies that it ever did such a test.
The denial is taken as proof by the conspiratorially minded that the experiment must have really occurred. The less gullible ask, Where did this story come from?
The story is a mixture of fact, fiction, speculation, and madness.
The facts are that the Navy does all kinds of experiments, many of them secret. Many of these experiments attempt to find military applications for the latest discoveries or theories in physics, such as Einstein's unified field theory. It seems to be a fact that the Navy was experimenting with "invisibility" in 1943, but not with making ships disappear. Edward Dudgeon, who says he was there on the U.S.S. Engstrom, claims that they hoped to make our ships "invisible to magnetic torpedoes by de-Gaussing them." Dudgeon described the procedure: to UFO investigator Jaques Vallee:
They sent the crew ashore and they wrapped the vessel in big cables, then they sent high voltages through these cables to scramble the ship's magnetic signature. This operation involved contract workers, and of course there were also merchant ships around, so civilian sailors could well have heard Navy personnel saying something like, "they're going to make us invisible," meaning undetectable by magnetic torpedoes....(Vallee)
he Engstrom and the Eldridge were harbored together and, according to Dudgeon, crew members from both ships had parties together on shore and "there was never any mention of anything unusual." Though they did witness some spectacular electric storms, he says. (St. Elmo's fire is common in the area.)
Marshall Barnes, who identifies himself as a "Special Civilian Investigator," claims Dudgeon's story is disinformation and that Vallee is a hoaxer out to cover up the government's real activities. Maybe so, but in March of 1999, sailors who’d served on the Eldridge reunited and told a Philadelphia Inquirer reporter that they "find the story amusing — especially because the ship never docked in Philadelphia."* Barnes also claims that he can prove that "optical invisibility" is possible through "the use of an intense electromagnetic field that would create a mirage effect of invisibility by refracting light."* He claims he proved this to the cable network A&E for an Unexplained episode, but that they reneged on the deal. One would think they would have jumped at the chance to demonstrate something so wondrous.
There have been other attempts to exploit the gullible with stories about this so-called experiment, but two stand out as more insane than the rest: The Philadelphia Experiment, and Other UFO Conspiracies, by Brad Steiger, with Alfred Bielek and Sherry-Hanson Steiger (1990); and The Philadelphia Experiment Part 1- Crossroads of History, presented by Alfred Bielek. The former is a book which rehashes the usual stories of CIA plots, government conspiracies, secret meetings with aliens, trips to Mars, visits from the Men in Black, etc. The latter is a video featuring a man who claims he was a physicist on the USS Eldridge in 1943 and was part of the team that conducted the experiment. Bielek claims he time-traveled in 1943 to 1983 during the experiment and lived to tell the story, only to be harassed by the U.S. government for his troubles.
The central claim of the Philadelphia experiment may have a basis in fact, however. Edward Dudgeon describes the event.
I was in [a] bar that evening, we had two or three beers, and I was one of the two sailors who are said to have disappeared mysteriously...The fight started when some of the sailors bragged about the secret equipment [radar, sonar, special screws, a new compass, etc.] and were told to keep their mouths shut. Two of us were minors....The waitresses scooted us out the back door as soon as trouble began and later denied knowing anything about us. We were leaving at two in the morning. The Eldridge had already left at 11 p.m. Someone looking at the harbor that night might have noticed that the Eldridge wasn't there any more and it did appear in Norfolk. It was back in Philadelphia harbor the next morning, which seems like an impossible feat: if you look at the map you'll see that merchant ships would have taken two days to make the trip. They would have required pilots to go around the submarine nets, the mines and so on at the harbor entrances to the Atlantic. But the Navy used a special inland channel, the Chesapeake-Delaware Canal, that bypassed all that. We made the trip in about six hours"
What Actually Happened in Philadelphia ,Diffrerence between Truth and Lies
In an earlier assessment of the Philadelphia Experiment data, the author offered the tentative conclusion that the story was, in part, based on fact: the Navy may have been involved in technically-advanced, classified tests in the Fall of 1943 (Vallee, 1991). These developments could have been misunderstood or deliberately romanticized by people like Allende, just as today we find tests of advanced flying platforms at Nellis Air Force Base being misinterpreted by believers. Furthermore I hypothesized that the experiments had to do with a radar countermeasures test. Indeed a Raytheon advertisement published thirteen years ago suggested that the corresponding technology was now out in the open (Raytheon, 1980). This hypothesis, however, failed to explain a few of the facts that highlighted the story. In particular it did not account for the observed disappearance of the destroyer from the harbor, for the mysterious devices brought on board under extreme security precautions, or for the alleged disappearance of two sailors from a nearby tavern. I called out to any one of my readers who might have additional information. That is how correspondents came to correspond, and later to meet face to face, with Mr. Edward Dudgeon.
"I am a sixty-seven year old retired executive. I was in the Navy from 1942 through 1945," began Mr. Dudgeon's letter (Dudgeon, 1992) explaining his purpose in contacting me (see Figure 3.) He confirmed that the idea of an actual, secret technical development was correct, but he said I was wrong about a radar test. The truth, as he patiently wrote to me, was simpler.
A few weeks later I met with Mr. Dudgeon, who produced his identification and his discharge papers from the U.S. Navy. Over the next two hours he gave me the details of his story and answered my questions.
"You must realize that in forty three, the Germans had been sinking our ships as fast as they came out of the harbors into the Atlantic, which they called "the Graveyard." I was just a kid then. In fact I falsified my birth certificate in order to join the Navy in 1942. I was only sixteen at the time, turning seventeen in December of 1942."
"What was your training?" interviewer asked him.
"I studied electronics at Iowa State. The Navy sent me to electronics school after boot camp. I graduated with the title of "electrician's mate third class" in February of 43, and then I went aboard ship in June 1943."
"Can you give me the name of the vessel?"
"Oh yes, the DE 50, U.S.S. Engstrom. It was a diesel electric ship, as opposed to the DE 173, the Eldridge, which was steam electric. These ships were run by the electricians. Our ship was put in dry dock so they could install high-torque screws."
"Why the special equipment?"
"The new screws made a sound of a different pitch, which made it harder for the submarines to hear us. They also installed a new sonar for underwater detection, and a device we called a "hedgehog" which was mounted in front of the forward gun mount on the bow. It fired depth charges in banks of twenty-four to thirty in a pattern, and could cover 180 degrees as far as about a mile away. That was one of the secrets. Your book Revelations was wrong about making the ship invisible to radar: the Germans hadn't deployed radar at the time. We were trying to make our ships invisible to magnetic torpedoes, by de-Gaussing them. We had regular radar and also a "micro-radar" of lower frequency. They could detect submarines as soon as they raised their periscopes or came up for air. We could pick them up in the dark or in fog as far as one or two miles away. That's when the Germans began to lose their U-boats."
They was on a destroyer that was there at the same time as the Eldridge DE 173.... I can explain all of the strange happenings as we had the same secret equipment on our ship. We were also with two other DEs and the Eldridge on shakedown in Bermuda and return to Philadelphia.
correspondent suggested a meeting, adding "I am not looking for any compensation for this or media exposure. I just want someone to know what I know before it is too late."
A few weeks later some people met with Mr. Dudgeon, who produced his identification and his discharge papers from the U.S. Navy. Over the next two hours he gave me the details of his story and answered my questions.
"You must realize that in forty three, the Germans had been sinking our ships as fast as they came out of the harbors into the Atlantic, which they called "the Graveyard." I was just a kid then. In fact I falsified my birth certificate in order to join the Navy in 1942. I was only sixteen at the time, turning seventeen in December of 1942."
Allende's letters were filled with cryptic references and mailed from an assortment of locales around America. They can be read on-line at Jessup eventually dismissed Allende as a crank until in 1957 he was contacted by Capt. Sidney Sherby and Comdr. George Hoover, two officers from the Office of Naval Research. They had received a copy of Jessup's book with strange annotations in the margins about a vanishing ship, aliens and other anomalies. The officers from ONR asked Jessup to travel to Washington D.C. to meet with them and discuss what the annotations might mean. When Jessup got there he was surprised to see that the annotations appeared to be from Allende although they had been written in three different colored inks as though three separate individuals had been writing comments.
Jessup had no idea what to make of it and was a little unsettled by the interest that these ONR officers had in the writing, especially about the ship that was made invisible and it's crew severely injured. The officers even paid Varo Inc. to reprint copies of the annotated version of Jessup's book and had them passed around ONR for consideration. Jessup confided in his friend Ivan Sanderson that he felt the officers might want to try the experiment again. Meanwhile Jessup's life began to be plagued by what he called "strange coincidences." He began to complain about his health. and his research efforts took a turn for the worse. In 1959 he was found dead in his car from carbon monoxide poisoning and declared a suicide without the benefit of an autopsy. Many believe to this day that he was actually murdered, with Allende left roaming the country to escape the same fate.
The Office of Naval Research has created a number of form "response" letters over the years to handle public inquiries into the Philadelphia Experiment. Somewhat embarrassed by all the attention drawn to them by the activities of the now long gone officers, and having not been in existence at the time of the experiment, the ONR has had to handle the lion's share of public requests for clarification and information. Until 1996 they had no trouble shrugging off accusations of cover-up with simple explanations about degaussing and misunderstandings about the word "invisible." They contend that the legend got started based on the routine task of demagnetizing or "degaussing" the ships so as to be "invisible" to magnetic mines and torpedoes. Echoing this position on "The Unexplained," as an official representative of the US. Navy, was US. naval historian John Reilly. Reilly stated that, as far as he knew, the navy never experimented with making ships invisible with magnetic fields. The navy has been long indirectly assisted in these apologetic efforts by the usual gaggle of disinforments.
"The Unexplained" featured an interview with researcher Robert Goerman, saying that he solved the mystery of the Philadelphia Experiment by a discovery he made about Carlos Allende. A writer from Pennsylvania who penned articles for pulp UFO magazines in the '70s, Goerman considered himself to be "a player," at least an also-ran amongst the galaxy of name UFO researchers of the time. When the book, "The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility," by William Moore and Charles Berlitz came out in 1979, Goerman was motivated to do his own investigation but in a different direction. Instead of checking into the new information and science that the book mentioned, he latched onto Allende because of a quirk of fate - his parents were neighbors of the parents of Allende. Furthermore, Allende's real name was Allen, Carl Meredith Allen. Goerman's daughter used to visit the Allens and it was just by chance that he discovered that they were in fact the family of the elusive Philadelphia Experiment "witness."
After agreeing to keep certain information about the family confidential, the Allens allowed Goerman to review various cards, letters, and other things that Carl had sent to his family. They described Carl as "a leg puller," and someone who was very intelligent but lacked the discipline to achieve his full potential. It was clear from the items that Goerman looked over that Carl would annotate everything. He was even quirkier and more eccentric than he had ever imagined. Armed with this new information, Goerman was convinced that he had the truth, especially after having conversations with Carl himself. Ignoring all other available information, Goerman wrote "Alias: Carlos Allende" and it was published in "Fate" magazine in 1980, now archived on the internet at. But Goerman's article was not well received by others in the UFO community. He has remained bitter about this, accusing those who ignore or disagree with his analysis as only being interested in "selling their books." An accusation that Goerman made on "The Unexplained" and intentionally or not, inferred this as a motive of the wrong researcher.
"I know the applicable laws, how to operate with law enforcement, do investigations, have a badge and I.D., weapons, the whole nine yards and all legal. I'm versed in psy-ops, surveillance, counter-surveillance, stings, non-lethal weapons. I know how and can intervene in a felony in progress and execute arrest procedures until law enforcement arrives. I've actually been involved in cases against pedophiles, a rouge psychic spy, Men In Black related activity, potential terrorism related to Y2K that threatens national security. No cops or state police have complained so far. I think that earns me the 'special'." So says Marshall Barnes, Special Civilian Investigator Marshall Barnes who "The Unexplained" had contacted through his book distributor because he was described as an expert on the Philadelphia Experiment. Under the pretext of trying to get to the truth, Mark Caras allegedly got Marshall to agree to appear on the show and not allow arguments that Marshall had disproved to go unchallenged.
Alternate explanations and stories
Researcher Jacques Vallee describes a procedure on board the USS Engstrom, which was docked alongside the Eldridge in 1943. The operation involved the generation of a powerful electromagnetic field on board the ship in order to degauss it, with the goal of rendering the ship undetectable — “invisible” — to magnetically-triggered torpedoes and mines. This system was invented by the British, who used it widely during the Second World War, and British ships of the era often included such systems built-in on the upper decks (the conduits are still visible on the deck of the HMS Belfast in London). Degaussing is a known military technology still in use to protect against these torpedoes; however, it has no effect on visible light or radar. Vallee speculates that accounts of the Engstrom’s degaussing may have been garbled in subsequent retellings, and these accounts may have influenced the story of the Philadelphia Experiment.
A veteran who served on board the Engstrom noted that the Eldridge could indeed have travelled from Philadelphia to Norfolk and back again in a single day at a time when merchant ships could not have — by use of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, which at the time was open only to naval vessels. Use of this channel was kept quiet: German submarines had recently been ravaging East Coast shipping during Operation Drumbeat, and thus military ships unable to protect themselves were secretly moved via canals to avoid this threat.
It should be noted that this same veteran claims to be the man whom Allende witnessed “disappear” at a bar. He claims that when the fight broke out, friendly barmaids whisked him out the back door of the bar before the police arrived, because he was under age. They then covered for him by claiming that he disappeared.
In a more speculative and strongly paranormal vein, Al Bielek and Duncan Cameron both claim to have leaped from the deck of the Eldridge while it was in “hyperspace” between Philadelphia and Norfolk, and ended up, after a period of severe disorientation, at the Air Force station Montauk Point, Long Island in 1983, having experienced not only teleportation but time travel. They claim John von Neumann met them there (although officially he died in 1957). This episode is a seminal event in another alleged secret and horrific US Government experiment into the paranormal known as the Montauk Project.
In 2003, Al Bielek's version of his participation in the Philadelphia Experiment was debunked by a small team of investigators (see the weblinks for reference), ruling him out as a real witness or survivor.
NEWSPAPER REVIEWS:-
Philadelphia Experiment News
September 21, 2000 - Death of a Legend Continued
The Scrap Metal Trading Company stated that the Eldridge was transferred to a demolition company for dismantle/destruction, and that they will try to provide more information on the name of the demolition company, and any photos they may of taken.
October 22, 1999 - Death of a Legend
I received a UPS Worldwide Express Envelope today marked Urgent. It was from a scrap metal Trading Corporation in Piraeus Greece the letter states;
"Subject: ex. USS ELDRIDGE
We have been informed of your interest for the abovementioned vessel.
We have taken the liberty to write to you this letter in order to inform you that this vessel is now under our ownership. Therefore if you would still have an interest on this vessel please contact us at the abovementioned address and numbers, preferably in Piraeus - Greece, as soon as possible."
After reading the above some basic questions my come to mind such as:
Is there any evidence that an experiment of this nature was really performed on the U.S.S. Eldridge (or any other ship) in 1943?
Did the Eldridge really "teleport" over 600 km in the blink of an eye? How could such an unusual assertion have been made?
If there really was an experiment of this nature, what happened to the men involved, and are any of the witnesses still alive after fifty years? Have any of them come forth and told their stories?
How could the Navy have kept such a technological breakthrough as implied by the PX covered up for over 50 years?
What kind of technology could have been implemented to cause the events discussed?
Were Einstein's theories really involved? Was his "Unified Field Theory" ever really "completed?"
Is the experiment still continuing behind closed doors today?
U.S.S. Eldridge, July 25, 1943
Norfolk Naval Yard - Portsmouth, December 12th, 1944
My search begins...
My fascination for the so-called �Philadelphia Experiment� started with the need for an entertaining academic diversion within Cambridge University library. I was stuck there one glum English Sunday, in search of enlightenment about the effects of the introduction of the Sweet Potato on the culture of highland New Guinea. After several hours of less than fascinating study, it struck me that, whilst surrounded by every single document ever to have been published within the shores of the British Isles (as indeed I was) there was probably some subject considerably more exciting and challenging here that I could be searching for. As I trudged from shelf to shelf, I began to covet a more glamorous and tantalizing holy grail to justify my presence there. But I wasnt quite sure what.
I was, as ever, in the company of Sparky, who was a theoretical Physicist. Or at least he was in as much as, in theory he was a physicist, though he rarely went to the trouble of putting it into practice. Never hard to distract, Sparky quickly thought of an appropriate goal for our wayward academic instincts. Inspired, I suspect, by a combination of the looming supernatural atmosphere of the Library Building (it looks not dissimilar from the temple of Gozer in Ghostbusters) and a latent guilt about not researching enough Physics, Sparky sent me looking for information about the Philadelphia Experiment.
He informed that during the second world war, the American military gathered together some of the world�s greatest physicists, and tasked them with pushing the very limits of human knowledge in an attempt to come up with some unprecedented technological advantage over the enemy which would enable them to break the current military deadlock. A scientific revolution was called for which could change the face of military history. As it happens they succeeded. Albert Einstein�s work led to the development of the atom bomb, which pretty much hit the nail on the head when it comes to physics changing the face of history. But that wasn�t the good bit. (Actually I classify atoms bombs under BAD). The mystery surrounds the other projects being worked on by Einstein, along with Dr. John von Neumann, Dr. Nikola Tesla, and others. The most intriguing of these is reported to be that work using huge magnetic fields to make warships �invisible� went rather wrong resulting in ships disappearing and reappearing instantly elsewhere having apparently experienced some kind of teleportation.
IT WAS PUBLISHED IN A DAILY JOURNAL OF NEW YORK.
Montauk Experiment.
The Philadelphia experiment originally began back in the 1930's in Chicago with three people. Dr. John Hutchinson Sr., who was the Dean of the University of Chicago, Nickola Tesla, and Dr. Kurtenaur, who was an Austrian physicist who was on staff at the University. They decided to do something with the speculation regarding the concept of things and people being invisible. This subject had been discussed for several year. They got together and did some research at the University of Chicago around 1931 or 1932. In 1933 the Institute of Advanced Studies at Princeton was formed and the project was transferred there in 1934. One of the people on staff at the Institute was Dr. John Erich Von Neumann, who was from Budapest Hungary. He got his degree in chemistry in 1925 and his Ph.D. in mathematics in 1926. He taught in Europe for about four years and transferred to the United States. He taught at the graduate level for three years and was invited to join the Institute.
Other people at the Institute included Albert Einstein, who left Germany in 1930. He went to the California Institute of Technology for three years and taught there and then went to the Institute upon their invitation and acceptance. A lot of other people showed up there as time went on. The project expanded about 1936. In the meantime, Tesla was named director of the project. He was a friend of president Franklin Roosevelt, whom Tesla met in 1917 when FDR was secretary of the Navy.
Tesla was asked at that time to do some work for the government for the war effort, which he did. He accepted and became director of the invisibility project until he resigned in 1942. In 1936, after intensive study, they decided to have an initial test of their work. They achieved some partial invisibility. The Navy and everyone else was encouraged to continue the work, and the Navy supplied money for research.
Scientists were coming to the United States from Germany until 1939, when the war with Germany was started.
In 1940, after research using Tesla's approach, they decided they were ready for a full test at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. They had a small ship and a tender ship at each side. One ship provided the power and the other supplied the drive for the coils. They were tendered to the test ship by cables. The idea was that if anything went wrong they could cut the cables or sink the test ship. Everything worked and the project was declared a success. The important point about the 1940 test is that there was no one on board the test vehicle. It was strictly a dry run with no people. This is important because of what happened later. Other people came on board. Thomas T. Brown joined the project because of his expertise in electrogravity effects. He had the task of solving the problem of the German magnetic mines that were affecting allied shipping and Naval efforts. This led into a parallel project which involved the use of deguising coils and cables to explode the mines at a distance from the ship.
The Navy wanted several people to keep an eye on the tests. That is how I got involved. Keeping technical commentaries. Let's look at Nickola Tesla.
In 1879 his father died and his first year at college ended. He came to the United States in1884. He had enormously intuitive insight. He had a perfect track record. Before coming to the US he had known Robert Oppenheimer, who later worked with the development of the atomic bomb, and Dr. David Hilbert, the mathematician who devised equations for Hilbert Space, which described multiple space or multiple realities mathematically.
These equations for multiple space became very important in the project. Dr. von Neumann met Hilbert in 1927 and retained a lot of what he had learned. With that, Von Neumann developed other new systems of mathematics. Von Neumann was considered to be one of the most outstanding mathematicians in this century. Some think he was better than Einstein. Another mathematician involved was Dr. John Levinson, who was born in 1912. He died in 1976. He published three books on mathematics. Levinson developed the so-called Levinson Time Equations. with all this behind them, the group had all they needed to proceed with the project.
After the successful 1940 test, the Navy decided to give the project unlimited funds and to classify the project. In 1942 Tesla was given a ship and a crew for a full sized test. Tesla got a battleship. Tesla and Von Neumann didn't agree on some things. Tesla insisted that they were going to have a very severe problem with personnel. Tesla wanted more time but the NAVY wouldn't agree. Tesla made periodic announcements in the late 1930's and early 1940's about his contact with off planet species. He was in contact with the outside, who agreed that there was a problem with the people. He decided to sabotage the 1942 test in an attempt to stop the project. He de-tuned the equipment so nothing would work. The test failed. Tesla then turned the project over to Von Neumann in March 1942 and left the project.
Von Neumann went to the Navy and requested time to study the problem to determine what had gone wrong. Von Neumann decided to make changes in some of the equipment. He decided he would need a special ship that was designed from the ground up. The Eldridge was selected. The equipment was built into the ship. They put all the equipment on the ship. October 1942 arrived. They selected 33 volunteers for the crew, who arrived after graduation in December 1942. We still have a picture of the class.
After the ship was out of drydock work began. In May of 1943 von Neumann installed a third generator. It would never synchronize with the other two. It went out of control one day and zapped one of the men. Von Neumann pulled out the third generator (installed because Tesla had convinced Von Neumann of the potential problem with people) and went back to the original design. In mid June, the ship had sea trials. On July 22, 1943, they had the test. The ship between radar and optically invisible. They discovered people very disoriented. The Navy pulled the crew off and consulted Von Neumann, who requested more time again from the Navy. The Navy, after consultation with higher-ups, announced that the drop dead date was on the 12th of August, 1943. Von Neumann voiced his concern that it wasn't enough time.
The Navy decided that it just wanted radar invisibility and not optical invisibility. The equipment was again modified by Von Neumann. August 12th arrived. We knew things were not right. The test began, and for about a minute everything was all right. The ships outline could be seen in the water. There was suddenly a blue flash and the ship disappeared entirely. No radio communication was possible. It was gone. In about three hours it came back. One of the masts was broken.
Some personnel were partially embedded in the steel deck. Others were fading in and out. Some disappeared entirely. Many were insane. The Navy extracted the crew and proceeded with four days of meetings to decided what to do about the problem. They decided there would be one more test with another dry run without personnel. They conducted the dry run using about 1000 feet of cable attached to another ship. In late October 1943 the test occurred. The ship disappeared for about 20 minutes. When it returned, they found equipment missing. Two transmitter cabinets and one generator was missing. The cabinet with the zero-time reference generator was intact. At that point, the Navy stripped the ship and stopped the project. The Eldridge served in the war and was turned over to Greece at the end of the war.
The important thing is that there were two tests that were exactly 40 years apart to the day. It was a 40 year separation in hyperspace. Now, the Earth itself has a biorhythm that peaks on a 20 year cycle on August 12th. It "just happened" to peak and provided the connecting link through the fields of the Earth for the two experiments to lock up in hyperspace. Walk-in efforts are aided if they occur during this peak.
The ship was pulled into hyperspace. We were inside the ship and knew something was drastically wrong with the test. We tried to shut it off but it wouldn't shut off. We ran out on deck and jumped over the side of the ship. We jumped overboard but ended up in a time tunnel which ended at Montauk, Long Island on August 12th, 1983. At night.
We were found very quickly and taken down stairs, where Von Neumann greeted us. He expected us. It was a bit of a shock. We had just been in 1943 and now we were in 1983 looking at Von Neumann as an old man. He said that there was a hyperspace lockup and that we had to go back and shut off the generators on the ship or the hyperspace rift would keep increasing and possibly engulf the planet. He had been waiting 40 years for us to arrive.
Montauk sent us back and we smashed the equipment with axes. The ship returned to its original point in space and about three hours later in time. From 1943 on, Von Neumann didn't know what happened. He had modified earlier equipment in 1943 to where he had a full blown time machine. The Germans also were working on time travel, and had it working in 1945 just before the end of the war. This is all a matter of record.
After the Navy decided to shut down the project in 1943, Von Neumann was sent to work on the atomic bomb project at Los Alamos until that was over. In 1947 there were major changes in the Department of Defense. Someone in the new structure decided to dig up the Philadelphia project to see if they could find out what went wrong. They asked Von Neumann to "take another look" at the project. He agreed.
There is another matter. Starting about August 6th, 1943, UFOs appeared over the Eldridge for about six days. They were there during the test. One of the UFOs was sucked up into hyperspace with the Eldridge and it ended up in an underground facility in Montauk in 1983. It contained a charging device which some aliens made us go back and get for them, as they didn't want humans to have it. We don't know who they were. Pruett was concerned about an alien invasion.
Also, Von Neumann was called by the government to come and assist in the examination of a crashed UFO in 1947 at Aztec. Another crash occurred at Aztec about a year later. The first crash had greys on it and none survived. At least one occupant survived the second crash. The radar systems unintentionally brought down the craft. Radar was used intentionally after that until the aliens got wise to it.
The occupant of the second crash was not a grey, and Von Neumann got to talk with it. Von Neumann asked it what the answer to the invisibility problems could be. He learned that he had to go back and do his homework in metaphysics. The nature of the problem was that the personnel on the ship were not locked to the zerotime reference of the ship. Humans are normally locked to the point of conception as a time reference, not a zero-time reference. The time stream lock allows the person to flow in synch with the system so interaction is possible.
Time locks are fragile. All the power of the project disrupted the time-locks of the people on the deck on the ship. When the ship came back in time, the people didn't come back to the same reference.
Von Neumann realized that he needed a computer, as well as some knowledge of metaphysics in order to be able to lock the time reference of the people to the time reference of the ship. He built a computer in 1950 for the purpose. It was ready to be installed in 1952 and a test was performed in 1953 that was successful. They didn't go floating off into space when it was over. At this point, the Navy canceled Project Rainbow and changed the name to project Phoenix.
Alot came out of the negative effects of the Rainbow project. Some of it led to mind control research programs in the Phoenix project. The invisibility research produced some Stealth technology as well as other highly classified projects.
In 1983, they decided to apply mind control to all participants in these projects in an effort to cover them up. They had also been working on another project: age regression. Now, Tesla had sought back in the 1940's to develop equipment that could help the members of the crew after they lost time-lock . The government developed it into the age regression program. It was physical age regression. A person retained the memory they had from the older age.
Tesla's theory was that if you took the individual's time-lock and moved it forward in time than you would remove aging. That's what happened. It took between 30 and 60 days for the body to complete the change to the new time reference.
When our astronauts first landed on the moon in 1969 they were greeted by a fleet of disks sitting on the rim of a crater. The astronauts asked their superiors if they knew about these disks. They were told "yes", that they were American disks. The astronauts were angry at being used as public relations men by the government.
Well, the aircraft combines two aspects for invisibility. One of the aspects relates to the construction and coating applied to the surface. The other aspect relates to an electronic type of invisibility package which is a result of work done on the Philadelphia experiment years ago. Also, the stealth has a secondary drive system which is very advanced and allows it to fly in space. The assistant director of NASA admitted that this came straight out of alien technology. He admitted this to the public.
There are breaks in the government secrecy programs that are starting to show up. More and more people are getting totally disgusted with government activities and attitudes and they are beginning to talk.
The Phoenix Project was a project that evolved out of the Philadelphia Project. It was a project that the Navy did in the 1930's and 1940's in an attempt to make ships invisible. They threw the switch one eventful day and the ship went into hyperspace. They had all sorts of problems with the people on the boat. It was a huge success as well as a huge failure - then they shelved it. Around 1947 it was decided to re-activate the project and it was moved to Brookhaven National Laboratories with Dr. John Von Neumann and his associates. Out of Phoenix I came Stealth technology. It also produced all sorts of energetic little toys like the radiosonde.
The radiosonde was a little white box that they attached to a balloon and sent up into the atmosphere. The government told people that it involved gathering weather data. It used a very unusual type of pulse modulation. In most cases they used a CW (continuous wave) oscillator and pulsed the signal. This turned out to be a very efficient conversion of electrical energy to etheric energy. They were designed up at Brookhaven National Labs. I started to talk to people at Brookhaven and ran into a retired gentleman who used to work there. He told me that the design was originally done by Wilhelm Reich.
The story goes that in about 1947 Wilhelm Reich handed the US Government a weather control device, a device that would do DOR-busting. Reich thought that if he could decrease the amount of DOR that storms would not be so violent. (DOR is the result of orgone energy coming into contact with an enclosed radioactive source). Deadly Orgone Energy is DOR. The government sent the device up into a storm and it did reduce the intensity of the storm. They worked.
The Montauk Project was a combination of Wilhelm Reich's work and the Philadelphia Experiment. There were two separate projects going on in Phoenix One. You had the invisibility aspect and you had the development of Wilhelm Reich's weather control. Toward the end of the Phoenix project, by using some of Wilhelm Reich's concepts and some of the transmission schemes used from the "radiosonde" project, they found that you could combine the two -factors and use them for 'Mind Control'.
The people who were running it went to the military and proposed that they could use it to "influence the minds of the enemy". The military loved the idea, and let them use the old Montauk Air Force Base. Among the equipment requested was an old SAGE radar unit, which was on the base. The base was shut down and everything was auctioned off. The group then moved in from the Brookhaven Labs. That began what we call Phoenix Two. They spent the first ten years from about 1969 to about 1979, researching pure mind control.
The first part of the mind control project was to take an individual and stand them about 250 feet away from the antenna. The SAGE radar had a peak pulse power of .5 MW. The antenna had a gain of 30db. That means an effective radiated power of at least a gigawatt. It was nominally a gigawatt. Can you imagine what that would do to people? I think its amazing these people are still here. It does things like burn out brain functions, create neurological damage, scar lungs from heat, etc. They tried this with a number of people and there were few survivors. The subjects were often indigent people they grabbed off the streets.
The project was controlled by Dr. John Von Neumann and Jack Pruett. About 30 people worked there. It was a joint project...Air Force & Navy. Original funding came from the Nazi government funds. In 1944 there was an American troop train that went through a French railroad tunnel carrying $10 billion in Nazi gold which they had found.
It was $10 billion at the 1944 price of $20 per ounce. The train was blown up in the tunnel. It killed 51 American soldiers. The gold turned up ten years later at Montauk. This has been verified. That money was used to finance the project for many years as the value of gold went up.
They spent all of it and ran out of money. That's when they tapped on ITT, who funded it. ITT was owned by Krupp in Germany. In terms of personnel, many of the civilians and scientists there were all ex-Nazi's who came from Germany both before and after the war ended.
The project was under US Government surveillance. The intelligence community knew what was going on and the CIA monitored everything, as did other government intelligence agencies. The field of players who actually operated on the base was small, between 30 and 50.
The funding was entirely private. After 1983, Senator Goldwater found out about it and started an investigation. He couldn't find any trace of government funding. Pruett was the metaphysical director of the project. He was Air Force. After he left Dr. Herman C. Untermann took over. They had an electronics expert, Dr. Mathew E. Zerrett, who came over from Germany in 1946 with Werhner von Braun. Probably the reason that they ran out of money is that they had a total of 25 bases around the United States to support. The last of the bases shut down August 12, 1983. The base at Montauk, where all the stations got their zero-time reference from, shut down and the other two remaining bases went down with it.
Other experiments included time travel. No one has picked up a tangible future beyond 2012 AD. There is a very abrupt wall there with nothing on the other side. A working time vortex was created to the future.
At one point a creature came through and everyone went into a panic. They shut the transmitter off. The creature ate people and equipment. They had to go back and shut down the unit in Philadelphia in order to shut off the unit in the future so they could stop this creature in 1983. This was on August 12,1983. The vortex locked on to the 12 August 1943 test and formed a loop.
Posted by STEVE at 8:25 PM 0 comments
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
· ▼ 2008 (1)
o ▼ November (1)
§ TEST 1
· ► 2007 (1)
About Me
STEPHEN JEFFREY
View my complete profile
His father (Alexander Duncan Cameron, Sr.) enlisted in the U.S. Navy prior to the U.S. entry into World War 1. He sired him and later A. Duncan Cameron, Jr. (May 1917), by different mothers. First you will read Alls account of the years leading up to the "Philadelphia Experiment. " Then, for the first time in any magazine, Al shares further information on other, less known experiments that continue to this day. Experiments that took place, and apparently, still do, at Montauk, Long Island.
In September of 1939, both Duncan and Baliek enlisted in the U.S. Navy-taking commissions as Lt. (J.G.) and then attending a 90-day training school for "Special Assignment" Navy personnel at Providence, Rhode Island.
With completion of training, They were both assigned to the Institute of Advanced Study (Princeton, N.J.) and directly to the ongoing "Project Invisibility."
In January 1941, they were sent to sea for sea duty on the U.S.S. Pennsylvania. We toured the Pacific until October 194 1, when the Pennsylvania was put in dry dock at Pearl Harbor. After taking leave in San Francisco and remaining there through December 1941, were returned to the Institute early in January 1942. We worked on the project through 1942-Nikola Tesla dropped out in March 1942, and Dr. John Von Neumann took over at that time With the return of his memories, in May 1986, of the Phoenix Project and of the Philadelphia Experiment (Project Rainbow) in January 1988, 1 have engaged in extensive lecturing and writing on the subject of The Philadelphia Experiment, its ramifications and the follow-on Project Phoenix, and the incredible consequences of the lockup through time. In 1943 came the Philadelphia Experiment and the lock-up with the Phoenix Project, ripping a huge hole in space-time. This was deliberately done by the aliens at the '83 end to put a rift in the fabric of space-time so large numbers of aliens and ships could come through. They all had time travel capabilities, but the rift was needed to get the large ships through and make a mass invasion of the United States, and later Europe, of aliens (primarily greys) and other types. When they landed at Edwards Air Force Base in the Muroc Dry Lake as well as another air baseI'm leaving a lot of details out-the government already knew all about the aliens being on this planet. [They knew] since 1887 with the first investigating commission under Grover Cleveland.
In any case, they knew that they were here, but then they came en masse. We were confronted by a technology that we couldn't counter, we couldn't handle it, we didn't know what to do about it. So the agreement with Eisenhower and his advisors was to sign a treaty with them, a noninterference treaty and get what technology we could from them-make some kind of agreement. We'd buy time and see what we could do about it later.
That was the basis of the agreement Because of that, very large numbers of aliens came in and eventually became part of the Phoenix Project. They were planning ahead. We didn't know what they were up to. And I'm looking at this in retrospect, not what we knew then. They were planning ahead. They knew what they were doing. They maneuvered and manipulated the Phoenix Project. They did not expect it to crash then. I am sure they anticipate its continuing for another decade, at least into the '90's.
In July 1943, the destroyer U.S.S. Eldridge pulled into the Delaware Bay area for a United States Naval experiment that involved the task of making the ship invisible. The project's official name is Project Rainbow, but was nicknamed and more commonly known as the Philadelphia Experiment.
Much has been written and speculated about the legendary experiment into invisibility, but sorting fact from fiction is a near impossible task, especially with the recent influx of misinformation and deliberate disinformation that has been spread by those connected to the U.S. Intelligence community and professional skeptics.
There is much controversy over what exactly happened, but one thing is for sure. For some reason, soon after the test was completed, a massive blanket of secrecy and denial was placed over what happened in Delaware Bay. It is thought that a huge scientific breakthrough was made, and the ship was accurately transported over space and time, disappearing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and reappearing in Norfolk, Virginia. Whatever did happen is still not known, but different theories are discussed below:
The "Official" Navy Record
The Navy admits that the U.S.S. Eldridge took part in an experiment that involved wrapping wire around the hull of the destroyer in an attempt to cancel out the magnetic fields of the metal on the ship. This is known as degaussing. This would render the ship "invisible" to underwater magnetic mines that rely on proximity sensors to trigger the detonation. These sensors operate by detecting magnetic fields around ships. Without the magnetic field, the ship would be able to pass through regions mined with these sensors, invisible to enemy mines, but not to radar or vision.
The Navy's report is very plausible, and doesn't mention any exotic results or circumstances. But could this just be a believable account to drop the interest by the general public, leaving only the true minority of investigators in doubt?
Physical Invisibility
Some scientists have developed the theory that the Navy was working on a way to make the ship invisible to vision. However, it didn't involve warping space time or any complex task of a similar nature. This theory suggests that the Eldridge was equipped with high frequency generators that would heat up the surrounding air to cause a mirage, making the vessel invisible.
This phenomenon is naturally occurring, and there have been cases where entire islands have disappeared from view in the right weather conditions. The high frequency generator would heat up the surrounding air and the water (creating a green-colored fog that was said to have engulfed the ship), causing a mirage to form, concealing the ship from view.
The generator would also account for the sickness (physical and mental) of the crew after the experiment. A high frequency generator can cause serious harm to a person's wellbeing, especially at close range. This is more plausible than the degaussing theory, and would also explain the crew's sick condition as a result of the test.
The main problem with these theories though, is that it doesn't explain how the U.S.S. Eldridge was seen in Norfolk, Virginia by the civilian crew of the SS Andrew Furuseth, when the ship disappeared from view in Philadelphia in a space of only about fifteen minutes. There are also details such as crewmen being fused to the hull of the ship and some not even reappearing.
Transported across space and time?
The most interesting theory about the Philadelphia Experiment is that the destroyer did in fact disappear and was teleported across space and time. Supposedly, there was a great number of ingenious scientists (including Tesla and Einstein) that were taking part in the experiment. However, Nikola Tesla was supposed to dead at the time of the Naval experiment.
The theory is that light has to be bent around the ship to make it invisible. To accomplish this, the Navy wrapped the ship's circumference in wire and passed a measured current through it. This caused a huge oscillating magnet to form a magnetic field around the ship, not only bending the light, but space and time as well. The physics of the experiment are reminiscent of Einstein's Unified Field Theory that once you bend light, you are also unwittingly bending space and time as well.
The first time this experiment was undertaken, the ship didn't completely disappear, and an imprint of the hull could be seen sitting in the water. The second time, the ship totally disappeared in a green fog and was sighted in Norfolk, Virginia.
A haunting fact is that when the ship reappeared, the crew were all in a state of disorientation. Some were mentally ill, while other crewmen didn't even return. There were also crewmen that returned embedded in the hull. Later accounts arose about the crewmen, including a former crew member who was involved in a bar fight, and all the participants froze in time, as reported by a local newspaper! There were also accounts of people who were on the ship, spontaneously combusting.
The mystery remains
It is still not known what happened that day in 1943, mainly due to the lack of witnesses coming forth who served aboard the Eldridge. There is also no documentation available to the public which details Project Rainbow. It may have simply been a degaussing experiment. But how did the destroyer appear seconds later in Virginia? Its possible the answer will never be known, but the mystery may be solved when scientists rediscover what happened in Delaware Bay.
In 1988, Al started to recover fragmented memories of his involvement in the Philadelphia Experiment after seeing a late night TV airing of the 1984 movie, The Philadelphia Experiment. Because of Al's involvement with the Philadelphia Experiment, the Montauk Project, and other secret, black budget programs, he's been subjected to brain washing (as have all personnel connected with these projects), with the goal of eliminating from his conscious mind all memories of his involvement. "Memories" can be created, changed, or wiped completely when you are subjected to mind control. Does that mean that Al's information may not be 100% accurate? Perhaps, but I feel strongly that the overwhelming bulk of information that Al has relayed over the years is accurate and has occurred as he has revealed it. Selected memories may have been distorted or 'inserted' into Al's mind ( he would have no way of knowing ) for disinformation purposes, but to dismiss it out of hand is foolish. Al had discovered that if both hemispheres of the brain are in balance or in 'sync', then mind control access/manipulation by mind control programmers is thwarted. He explains in his autobiography tapes a couple of methods for balancing the left brain and the right brain to achieve this balanced state.
Al Bielek and Phil Schneider have been two of the very best sources we have had to reveal highly secret information about the black projects of the American government. (People have often asked Al why he hasn't been killed if his information is so good. He tells them that he and brother Duncan have something of a protected status because their bodies are locked in with the time experiments of Montauk and that the earth needs to complete a biorhythm stabilization cycle that converges on Aug. 12, 2003. That stabilization is somehow locked in with Al and Duncan's bodies. Al already found out that he cannot be arrested when he was taken into custody after being discovered on a clandestine inspection of the Montauk base in the early 1990's.)
1991 Interview with Al Bielek
This 1991 interview took place in Yelm, Washington between Al Bielek and unnamed reporters working for The Sovereign Scribe of McKenna, Washington. Al recounts how he and his brother Duncan were transported by a Time Tunnel machine located at Montauk, Long Island into the interior of an underground facility on Mars in the late 70's. The United States, possibly Russia, and certain aliens already had bases established on the surface of Mars in 1969 in keeping with the provisions of an agreement between the aliens and the US called Alternative 3. The US personnel on the ground, however, couldn't gain access to these interior Martian facilities because they lacked the heavy equipment needed to force an entry. Possessing advanced computers and exact positioning coordinates for Mars, the Time-Space tunnel machine set up at Montauk could place Al and his brother at any location on or inside the planet to within a few inches of computer coordinates. Al and Duncan made many authorized trips to Mars with the Time Tunnel and two "unauthorized" trips on their own in which they were later discovered and taken off the Mars time tunnel project.
1997 Interview with Al Bielek Part 1 & 2
Kenneth Burke of Leading Edge Newspaper interviewed Al Bielek at the Global Sciences Congress, Daytona Beach, Florida in August 1997. A highly revealing interview. Covers many important topics.
Al's 1992 Video on Mind Control with Vladimir Terziski
Al Bielek made at least two underground videos with Valdimir Terziski. The first one covered the Philadelphia Experiment in depth and this second video went into the mind control aspects of the Montauk Project, which included both trauma-based mind control of the "Montauk Boys" and the development of microwave electronic mind control that is now being implemented worldwide. You can read a brief summary of this video on the Products page by clicking the above link.
The 2003 Al Bielek Debunking Campaign
July 22, 2003. A new campaign to debunk Al Bielek got kicked off on the internet somewhere in late Spring of this year. I've been sent e-mails by two relatively unknown individuals who are anxious to have me review their debunking allegations against Al. I haven't responded to them yet, but a third individual said to be associated with this current debunking effort is better known; his name is Marshall Barnes. Barnes has previously spoken supportively of the Philadelphia Experiment (and Al Bielek) on the radio, so one has to wonder what's going on there. This is not the first time a campaign has been launched to discredit the Philadelphia Experiment story. The late Jacques Vallee attempted to do just that in 1994 with an article titled: Anatomy of a Hoax: The Philadelphia Experiment 50 Years Later which appeared in the Journal of Scientific Exploration. I guess it might have held sway at least with the casual reader, had it not been thoroughly demolished and shown to be a disinfo piece in an article titled: Debunking The Philadelphia Experiment Debunkers which appeared on December 6, 2001 at www.rense.com. One has to wonder if Al's unexpected sleuthing and resultant discovery of the HIDDEN FILES embedded within the CDs mentioned above could have had anything to do with this latest discrediting effort, or if Al's more recent radio interviews discussing information about worldwide electronic mind control using microwave "cell phone" towers has anything to do with it. Regardless of the reason, Al says that one doesn't have to scratch very deep beneath the surface to find the hidden hand of Naval Intelligence at work when it comes to undermining his credibility or the reality of the entire Philadelphia Experiment saga.
According to his own records, Bielek has been on over 50 radio talk shows and a featured speaker at over 40 conferences. We will outline in the body of our presentation the following re-evaluation of Al Bielek.
· He never participated in the PX
· He never witnessed the PX
· He was no where near the PX test when it occurred
· He has changed the nature of his story many times over the years with additions, embellishments, deletions and wholesale fabrication of events
· He has stated historical events that can be completely verified to be totally false
These points are a sampling of what we will present in our report.
That remains amazing is that Bielek's story was widely accepted by the media and his 'fan community' without criticism. People of all backgrounds were quick to repeat his quotes, often just borrowing them from someone else's web page, without checking the claims or presenting any critical analysis of whether they 'could' be true. The most astute observer and researcher of the PX is Marshall Barnes. He has been doing a thorough investigation of the Philadelphia Experiment since the early '90's. Barnes asked basic questions that no one else thought pertinent and with time he began to find great discrepancies with Bielek's claims. Starting from a basic dissatisfaction with Bielek's so called "facts", observing that not one claim was supported by a "hard evidence" [which means that it can be verified] Marshall began a large-scale investigation. Eventually a small number of people joined Marshall in his endeavors and the result of this long-term research is this report.
Among this group of researchers were Marshall Barnes (USA), Fred Houpt (CAN) and Gerold Schelm (GER), making this investigation a real international event. Our group effort can demonstrate that the claims of Al Bielek and his companions is nothing short of very impressive media manipulation, dis-information, partially correct data mixed into fabrications and completely false statements. Where there will always be those of the opinion that Bielek's media circus is the creation of a government-guided operation, what we can say with certainty is that to some degree it has been a profitable venture for Bielek and friends. Whether they were selling hokum and malarkey never seemed to stop the curious and naïve from buying tapes and videos and attending conferences.
The fact is that the one factor missing for over a decade, is a step by step de-construction of the PX-Bielek saga as it was told by Al Bielek. We have accomplished that and we are confident that his version, his story, does not hold up to severe scrutiny. The references used for this presentation are the common transcripts of some speeches and interviews given by Al Bielek, which are still accessible on the internet. Additionally, we make reference to the content of Al Bielek's own web site, www.bielek.com, which has presented the photo material referred to in this report. Often, we use Al Bielek's own data to point out where he has either lied, mixed and matched bits and pieces of the real story or else just made up a great deal of nonsense. When we say that someone has 'lied', we are required to show evidence for the accusation. We have documentary evidence showing Bielek lying on several of the main subjects and the source is emails and official documents, which we have provided as part of the report.
PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT.:-
The Philadelphia experiment originally began back in the 1930's in Chicago with three people. Dr. John Hutchinson Sr., who was the Dean of the University of Chicago, Nickola Tesla, and Dr. Kurtenaur, who was an Austrian physicist who was on staff at the University. They decided to do something with the speculation regarding the concept of things and people being invisible. This subject had been discussed for several year. They got together and did some research at the University of Chicago around 1931 or 1932. In 1933 the Institute of Advanced Studies at Princeton was formed and the project was transferred there in 1934. One of the people on staff at the Institute was Dr. John Erich Von Neumann, who was from Budapest Hungary. He got his degree in chemistry in 1925 and his Ph.D. in mathematics in 1926. He taught in Europe for about four years and transferred to the United States. He taught at the graduate level for three years and was invited to join the Institute.
Other people at the Institute included Albert Einstein, who left Germany in 1930. He went to the California Institute of Technology for three years and taught there and then went to the Institute upon their invitation and acceptance. A lot of other people showed up there as time went on. The project expanded about 1936. In the meantime, Tesla was named director of the project. He was a friend of president Franklin Roosevelt, whom Tesla met in 1917 when FDR was secretary of the Navy.
Tesla was asked at that time to do some work for the government for the war effort, which he did. He accepted and became director of the invisibility project until he resigned in 1942. In 1936, after intensive study, they decided to have an initial test of their work. They achieved some partial invisibility. The Navy and everyone else was encouraged to continue the work, and the Navy supplied money for research.
Scientists were coming to the United States from Germany until 1939, when the war with Germany was started.
In 1940, after research using Tesla's approach, they decided they were ready for a full test at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. They had a small ship and a tender ship at each side. One ship provided the power and the other supplied the drive for the coils. They were tendered to the test ship by cables. The idea was that if anything went wrong they could cut the cables or sink the test ship. Everything worked and the project was declared a success.
The important point about the 1940 test is that there was no one on board the test vehicle. It was strictly a dry run with no people. This is important because of what happened later. Other people came on board. Thomas T. Brown joined the project because of his expertise in electro gravity effects. He had the task of solving the problem of the German magnetic mines that were affecting allied shipping and Naval efforts. This led into a parallel project which involved the use of disguising coils and cables to explode the mines at a distance from the ship.
The Navy wanted several people to keep an eye on the tests. That is how I got involved. Keeping technical commentaries. Let's look at Nickola Tesla.
In 1879 his father died and his first year at college ended. He came to the United States in1884. He had enormously intuitive insight. He had a perfect track record. Before coming to the US he had known Robert Oppenheimer, who later worked with the development of the atomic bomb, and Dr. David Hilbert, the mathematician who devised equations for Hilbert Space, which described multiple space or multiple realities mathematically.
These equations for multiple space became very important in the project. Dr. von Neumann met Hilbert in 1927 and retained a lot of what he had learned. With that, Von Neumann developed other new systems of mathematics. Von Neumann was considered to be one of the most outstanding mathematicians in this century. Some think he was better than Einstein. Another mathematician involved was Dr. John Levinson, who was born in 1912. He died in 1976. He published three books on mathematics. Levinson developed the so-called Levinson Time Equations. with all this behind them, the group had all they needed to proceed with the project.
After the successful 1940 test, the Navy decided to give the project unlimited funds and to classify the project. In 1942 Tesla was given a ship and a crew for a full sized test. Tesla got a battleship. Tesla and Von Neumann didn't agree on some things. Tesla insisted that they were going to have a very severe problem with personnel. Tesla wanted more time but the NAVY wouldn't agree. Tesla made periodic announcements in the late 1930's and early 1940's about his contact with off planet species. He was in contact with the outside, who agreed that there was a problem with the people. He decided to sabotage the 1942 test in an attempt to stop the project. He de-tuned the equipment so nothing would work. The test failed. Tesla then turned the project over to Von Neumann in March 1942 and left the project.
Von Neumann went to the Navy and requested time to study the problem to determine what had gone wrong. Von Neumann decided to make changes in some of the equipment. He decided he would need a special ship that was designed from the ground up. The Eldridge was selected. The equipment was built into the ship. They put all the equipment on the ship. October 1942 arrived. They selected 33 volunteers for the crew, who arrived after graduation in December 1942.
After the ship was out of drydock work began. In May of 1943 von Neumann installed a third generator. It would never synchronize with the other two. It went out of control one day and zapped one of the men. Von Neumann pulled out the third generator (installed because Tesla had convinced Von Neumann of the potential problem with people) and went back to the original design. In mid June, the ship had sea trials. On July 22, 1943, they had the test. The ship between radar and optically invisible. They discovered people very disoriented. The Navy pulled the crew off and consulted Von Neumann, who requested more time again from the Navy. The Navy, after consultation with higher-ups, announced that the drop dead date was on the 12th of August, 1943. Von Neumann voiced his concern that it wasn't enough time.
The Navy decided that it just wanted radar invisibility and not optical invisibility. The equipment was again modified by Von Neumann. August 12th arrived. We knew things were not right. The test began, and for about a minute everything was all right. The ships outline could be seen in the water. There was suddenly a blue flash and the ship disappeared entirely. No radio communication was possible. It was gone. In about three hours it came back. One of the masts was broken.
Some personnel were partially embedded in the steel deck. Others were fading in and out. Some disappeared entirely. Many were insane. The Navy extracted the crew and proceeded with four days of meetings to decided what to do about the problem. They decided there would be one more test with another dry run without personnel. They conducted the dry run using about 1000 feet of cable attached to another ship. In late October 1943 the test occurred. The ship disappeared for about 20 minutes. When it returned, they found equipment missing. Two transmitter cabinets and one generator was missing. The cabinet with the zero-time reference generator was intact. At that point, the Navy stripped the ship and stopped the project. The Eldridge served in the war and was turned over to Greece at the end of the war.
The important thing is that there were two tests that were exactly 40 years apart to the day. It was a 40 year separation in hyperspace. Now, the Earth itself has a biorhythm that peaks on a 20 year cycle on August 12th. It "just happened" to peak and provided the connecting link through the fields of the Earth for the two experiments to lock up in hyperspace. Walk-in efforts are aided if they occur during this peak.
The ship was pulled into hyperspace. We were inside the ship and knew something was drastically wrong with the test. We tried to shut it off but it wouldn't shut off. We ran out on deck and jumped over the side of the ship. We jumped overboard but ended up in a time tunnel which ended at Montauk, Long Island on August 12th, 1983. At night.
We were found very quickly and taken down stairs, where Von Neumann greeted us. He expected us. It was a bit of a shock. We had just been in 1943 and now we were in 1983 looking at Von Neumann as an old man. He said that there was a hyperspace lockup and that we had to go back and shut off the generators on the ship or the hyperspace rift would keep increasing and possibly engulf the planet. He had been waiting 40 years for us to arrive.
Montauk sent us back and we smashed the equipment with axes. The ship returned to its original point in space and about three hours later in time. From 1943 on, Von Neumann didn't know what happened. He had modified earlier equipment in 1943 to where he had a full blown time machine. The Germans also were working on time travel, and had it working in 1945 just before the end of the war. This is all a matter of record.
They spent the first ten years from about 1969 to about 1979, researching pure mind control.
The first part of the mind control project was to take an individual and stand them about 250 feet away from the antenna. The SAGE radar had a peak pulse power of .5 MW. The antenna had a gain of 30db. That means an effective radiated power of at least a gigawatt. It was nominally a gigawatt. Can you imagine what that would do to people? Some think its amazing these people are still here. It does things like burn out brain functions, create neurological damage, scar lungs from heat, etc. They tried this with a number of people and there were few survivors. The subjects were often indigent people they grabbed off the streets.
The project was controlled by Dr. John Von Neumann and Jack Pruett. About 30 people worked there. It was a joint project...Air Force & Navy. Original funding came from the Nazi government funds. In 1944 there was an American troop train that went through a French railroad tunnel carrying $10 billion in Nazi gold which they had found.
It was $10 billion at the 1944 price of $20 per ounce. The train was blown up in the tunnel. It killed 51 American soldiers. The gold turned up ten years later at Montauk. This has been verified. That money was used to finance the project for many years as the value of gold went up.
They spent all of it and ran out of money. That's when they tapped on ITT, who funded it. ITT was owned by Krupp in Germany. In terms of personnel, many of the civilians and scientists there were all ex-Nazi's who came from Germany both before and after the war ended.
The project was under US Government surveillance. The intelligence community knew what was going on and the CIA monitored everything, as did other government intelligence agencies. The field of players who actually operated on the base was small, between 30 and 50.
The funding was entirely private. After 1983, Senator Goldwater found out about it and started an investigation. He couldn't find any trace of government funding. Pruett was the metaphysical director of the project. He was Air Force. After he left Dr. Herman C. Untermann took over. They had an electronics expert, Dr. Mathew E. Zerrett, who came over from Germany in 1946 with Werhner von Braun. Probably the reason that they ran out of money is that they had a total of 25 bases around the United States to support. The last of the bases shut down August 12, 1983. The base at Montauk, where all the stations got their zero-time reference from, shut down and the other two remaining bases went down with it.
Other experiments included time travel. No one has picked up a tangible future beyond 2012 AD. There is a very abrupt wall there with nothing on the other side. A working time vortex was created to the future.
At one point a creature came through and everyone went into a panic. They shut the transmitter off. The creature ate people and equipment. They had to go back and shut down the unit in Philadelphia in order to shut off the unit in the future so they could stop this creature in 1983. This was on August 12,1983. The vortex locked on to the 12 August 1943 test and formed a loop.
GOVERNMENT COVERUP TO PX :-
The Philadelphia experiment is an alleged United States Navy experiment (Project Rainbow) done on October 28, 1943. According to legend, the destroyer USS Eldridge was made invisible, dematerialized, and teleported from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Norfolk, Virginia, and back again to the Philadelphia Naval Yard. The experiment allegedly had such terrible side effects, such as making sailors invisible and causing them to go mad, that the Navy quit exploring this exciting new technology.
The experiment was allegedly done by Dr. Franklin Reno as an application of Einstein's unified field theory. The experiment supposedly demonstrated a successful connection between gravity and electromagnetism: electromagnetic space-time warping
The Navy denies that it ever did such a test.
The denial is taken as proof by the conspiratorially minded that the experiment must have really occurred. The less gullible ask, Where did this story come from?
The story is a mixture of fact, fiction, speculation, and madness.
The facts are that the Navy does all kinds of experiments, many of them secret. Many of these experiments attempt to find military applications for the latest discoveries or theories in physics, such as Einstein's unified field theory. It seems to be a fact that the Navy was experimenting with "invisibility" in 1943, but not with making ships disappear. Edward Dudgeon, who says he was there on the U.S.S. Engstrom, claims that they hoped to make our ships "invisible to magnetic torpedoes by de-Gaussing them." Dudgeon described the procedure: to UFO investigator Jaques Vallee:
They sent the crew ashore and they wrapped the vessel in big cables, then they sent high voltages through these cables to scramble the ship's magnetic signature. This operation involved contract workers, and of course there were also merchant ships around, so civilian sailors could well have heard Navy personnel saying something like, "they're going to make us invisible," meaning undetectable by magnetic torpedoes....(Vallee)
he Engstrom and the Eldridge were harbored together and, according to Dudgeon, crew members from both ships had parties together on shore and "there was never any mention of anything unusual." Though they did witness some spectacular electric storms, he says. (St. Elmo's fire is common in the area.)
Marshall Barnes, who identifies himself as a "Special Civilian Investigator," claims Dudgeon's story is disinformation and that Vallee is a hoaxer out to cover up the government's real activities. Maybe so, but in March of 1999, sailors who’d served on the Eldridge reunited and told a Philadelphia Inquirer reporter that they "find the story amusing — especially because the ship never docked in Philadelphia."* Barnes also claims that he can prove that "optical invisibility" is possible through "the use of an intense electromagnetic field that would create a mirage effect of invisibility by refracting light."* He claims he proved this to the cable network A&E for an Unexplained episode, but that they reneged on the deal. One would think they would have jumped at the chance to demonstrate something so wondrous.
There have been other attempts to exploit the gullible with stories about this so-called experiment, but two stand out as more insane than the rest: The Philadelphia Experiment, and Other UFO Conspiracies, by Brad Steiger, with Alfred Bielek and Sherry-Hanson Steiger (1990); and The Philadelphia Experiment Part 1- Crossroads of History, presented by Alfred Bielek. The former is a book which rehashes the usual stories of CIA plots, government conspiracies, secret meetings with aliens, trips to Mars, visits from the Men in Black, etc. The latter is a video featuring a man who claims he was a physicist on the USS Eldridge in 1943 and was part of the team that conducted the experiment. Bielek claims he time-traveled in 1943 to 1983 during the experiment and lived to tell the story, only to be harassed by the U.S. government for his troubles.
The central claim of the Philadelphia experiment may have a basis in fact, however. Edward Dudgeon describes the event.
I was in [a] bar that evening, we had two or three beers, and I was one of the two sailors who are said to have disappeared mysteriously...The fight started when some of the sailors bragged about the secret equipment [radar, sonar, special screws, a new compass, etc.] and were told to keep their mouths shut. Two of us were minors....The waitresses scooted us out the back door as soon as trouble began and later denied knowing anything about us. We were leaving at two in the morning. The Eldridge had already left at 11 p.m. Someone looking at the harbor that night might have noticed that the Eldridge wasn't there any more and it did appear in Norfolk. It was back in Philadelphia harbor the next morning, which seems like an impossible feat: if you look at the map you'll see that merchant ships would have taken two days to make the trip. They would have required pilots to go around the submarine nets, the mines and so on at the harbor entrances to the Atlantic. But the Navy used a special inland channel, the Chesapeake-Delaware Canal, that bypassed all that. We made the trip in about six hours"
What Actually Happened in Philadelphia ,Diffrerence between Truth and Lies
In an earlier assessment of the Philadelphia Experiment data, the author offered the tentative conclusion that the story was, in part, based on fact: the Navy may have been involved in technically-advanced, classified tests in the Fall of 1943 (Vallee, 1991). These developments could have been misunderstood or deliberately romanticized by people like Allende, just as today we find tests of advanced flying platforms at Nellis Air Force Base being misinterpreted by believers. Furthermore I hypothesized that the experiments had to do with a radar countermeasures test. Indeed a Raytheon advertisement published thirteen years ago suggested that the corresponding technology was now out in the open (Raytheon, 1980). This hypothesis, however, failed to explain a few of the facts that highlighted the story. In particular it did not account for the observed disappearance of the destroyer from the harbor, for the mysterious devices brought on board under extreme security precautions, or for the alleged disappearance of two sailors from a nearby tavern. I called out to any one of my readers who might have additional information. That is how correspondents came to correspond, and later to meet face to face, with Mr. Edward Dudgeon.
"I am a sixty-seven year old retired executive. I was in the Navy from 1942 through 1945," began Mr. Dudgeon's letter (Dudgeon, 1992) explaining his purpose in contacting me (see Figure 3.) He confirmed that the idea of an actual, secret technical development was correct, but he said I was wrong about a radar test. The truth, as he patiently wrote to me, was simpler.
A few weeks later I met with Mr. Dudgeon, who produced his identification and his discharge papers from the U.S. Navy. Over the next two hours he gave me the details of his story and answered my questions.
"You must realize that in forty three, the Germans had been sinking our ships as fast as they came out of the harbors into the Atlantic, which they called "the Graveyard." I was just a kid then. In fact I falsified my birth certificate in order to join the Navy in 1942. I was only sixteen at the time, turning seventeen in December of 1942."
"What was your training?" interviewer asked him.
"I studied electronics at Iowa State. The Navy sent me to electronics school after boot camp. I graduated with the title of "electrician's mate third class" in February of 43, and then I went aboard ship in June 1943."
"Can you give me the name of the vessel?"
"Oh yes, the DE 50, U.S.S. Engstrom. It was a diesel electric ship, as opposed to the DE 173, the Eldridge, which was steam electric. These ships were run by the electricians. Our ship was put in dry dock so they could install high-torque screws."
"Why the special equipment?"
"The new screws made a sound of a different pitch, which made it harder for the submarines to hear us. They also installed a new sonar for underwater detection, and a device we called a "hedgehog" which was mounted in front of the forward gun mount on the bow. It fired depth charges in banks of twenty-four to thirty in a pattern, and could cover 180 degrees as far as about a mile away. That was one of the secrets. Your book Revelations was wrong about making the ship invisible to radar: the Germans hadn't deployed radar at the time. We were trying to make our ships invisible to magnetic torpedoes, by de-Gaussing them. We had regular radar and also a "micro-radar" of lower frequency. They could detect submarines as soon as they raised their periscopes or came up for air. We could pick them up in the dark or in fog as far as one or two miles away. That's when the Germans began to lose their U-boats."
They was on a destroyer that was there at the same time as the Eldridge DE 173.... I can explain all of the strange happenings as we had the same secret equipment on our ship. We were also with two other DEs and the Eldridge on shakedown in Bermuda and return to Philadelphia.
correspondent suggested a meeting, adding "I am not looking for any compensation for this or media exposure. I just want someone to know what I know before it is too late."
A few weeks later some people met with Mr. Dudgeon, who produced his identification and his discharge papers from the U.S. Navy. Over the next two hours he gave me the details of his story and answered my questions.
"You must realize that in forty three, the Germans had been sinking our ships as fast as they came out of the harbors into the Atlantic, which they called "the Graveyard." I was just a kid then. In fact I falsified my birth certificate in order to join the Navy in 1942. I was only sixteen at the time, turning seventeen in December of 1942."
Allende's letters were filled with cryptic references and mailed from an assortment of locales around America. They can be read on-line at Jessup eventually dismissed Allende as a crank until in 1957 he was contacted by Capt. Sidney Sherby and Comdr. George Hoover, two officers from the Office of Naval Research. They had received a copy of Jessup's book with strange annotations in the margins about a vanishing ship, aliens and other anomalies. The officers from ONR asked Jessup to travel to Washington D.C. to meet with them and discuss what the annotations might mean. When Jessup got there he was surprised to see that the annotations appeared to be from Allende although they had been written in three different colored inks as though three separate individuals had been writing comments.
Jessup had no idea what to make of it and was a little unsettled by the interest that these ONR officers had in the writing, especially about the ship that was made invisible and it's crew severely injured. The officers even paid Varo Inc. to reprint copies of the annotated version of Jessup's book and had them passed around ONR for consideration. Jessup confided in his friend Ivan Sanderson that he felt the officers might want to try the experiment again. Meanwhile Jessup's life began to be plagued by what he called "strange coincidences." He began to complain about his health. and his research efforts took a turn for the worse. In 1959 he was found dead in his car from carbon monoxide poisoning and declared a suicide without the benefit of an autopsy. Many believe to this day that he was actually murdered, with Allende left roaming the country to escape the same fate.
The Office of Naval Research has created a number of form "response" letters over the years to handle public inquiries into the Philadelphia Experiment. Somewhat embarrassed by all the attention drawn to them by the activities of the now long gone officers, and having not been in existence at the time of the experiment, the ONR has had to handle the lion's share of public requests for clarification and information. Until 1996 they had no trouble shrugging off accusations of cover-up with simple explanations about degaussing and misunderstandings about the word "invisible." They contend that the legend got started based on the routine task of demagnetizing or "degaussing" the ships so as to be "invisible" to magnetic mines and torpedoes. Echoing this position on "The Unexplained," as an official representative of the US. Navy, was US. naval historian John Reilly. Reilly stated that, as far as he knew, the navy never experimented with making ships invisible with magnetic fields. The navy has been long indirectly assisted in these apologetic efforts by the usual gaggle of disinforments.
"The Unexplained" featured an interview with researcher Robert Goerman, saying that he solved the mystery of the Philadelphia Experiment by a discovery he made about Carlos Allende. A writer from Pennsylvania who penned articles for pulp UFO magazines in the '70s, Goerman considered himself to be "a player," at least an also-ran amongst the galaxy of name UFO researchers of the time. When the book, "The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility," by William Moore and Charles Berlitz came out in 1979, Goerman was motivated to do his own investigation but in a different direction. Instead of checking into the new information and science that the book mentioned, he latched onto Allende because of a quirk of fate - his parents were neighbors of the parents of Allende. Furthermore, Allende's real name was Allen, Carl Meredith Allen. Goerman's daughter used to visit the Allens and it was just by chance that he discovered that they were in fact the family of the elusive Philadelphia Experiment "witness."
After agreeing to keep certain information about the family confidential, the Allens allowed Goerman to review various cards, letters, and other things that Carl had sent to his family. They described Carl as "a leg puller," and someone who was very intelligent but lacked the discipline to achieve his full potential. It was clear from the items that Goerman looked over that Carl would annotate everything. He was even quirkier and more eccentric than he had ever imagined. Armed with this new information, Goerman was convinced that he had the truth, especially after having conversations with Carl himself. Ignoring all other available information, Goerman wrote "Alias: Carlos Allende" and it was published in "Fate" magazine in 1980, now archived on the internet at. But Goerman's article was not well received by others in the UFO community. He has remained bitter about this, accusing those who ignore or disagree with his analysis as only being interested in "selling their books." An accusation that Goerman made on "The Unexplained" and intentionally or not, inferred this as a motive of the wrong researcher.
"I know the applicable laws, how to operate with law enforcement, do investigations, have a badge and I.D., weapons, the whole nine yards and all legal. I'm versed in psy-ops, surveillance, counter-surveillance, stings, non-lethal weapons. I know how and can intervene in a felony in progress and execute arrest procedures until law enforcement arrives. I've actually been involved in cases against pedophiles, a rouge psychic spy, Men In Black related activity, potential terrorism related to Y2K that threatens national security. No cops or state police have complained so far. I think that earns me the 'special'." So says Marshall Barnes, Special Civilian Investigator Marshall Barnes who "The Unexplained" had contacted through his book distributor because he was described as an expert on the Philadelphia Experiment. Under the pretext of trying to get to the truth, Mark Caras allegedly got Marshall to agree to appear on the show and not allow arguments that Marshall had disproved to go unchallenged.
Alternate explanations and stories
Researcher Jacques Vallee describes a procedure on board the USS Engstrom, which was docked alongside the Eldridge in 1943. The operation involved the generation of a powerful electromagnetic field on board the ship in order to degauss it, with the goal of rendering the ship undetectable — “invisible” — to magnetically-triggered torpedoes and mines. This system was invented by the British, who used it widely during the Second World War, and British ships of the era often included such systems built-in on the upper decks (the conduits are still visible on the deck of the HMS Belfast in London). Degaussing is a known military technology still in use to protect against these torpedoes; however, it has no effect on visible light or radar. Vallee speculates that accounts of the Engstrom’s degaussing may have been garbled in subsequent retellings, and these accounts may have influenced the story of the Philadelphia Experiment.
A veteran who served on board the Engstrom noted that the Eldridge could indeed have travelled from Philadelphia to Norfolk and back again in a single day at a time when merchant ships could not have — by use of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, which at the time was open only to naval vessels. Use of this channel was kept quiet: German submarines had recently been ravaging East Coast shipping during Operation Drumbeat, and thus military ships unable to protect themselves were secretly moved via canals to avoid this threat.
It should be noted that this same veteran claims to be the man whom Allende witnessed “disappear” at a bar. He claims that when the fight broke out, friendly barmaids whisked him out the back door of the bar before the police arrived, because he was under age. They then covered for him by claiming that he disappeared.
In a more speculative and strongly paranormal vein, Al Bielek and Duncan Cameron both claim to have leaped from the deck of the Eldridge while it was in “hyperspace” between Philadelphia and Norfolk, and ended up, after a period of severe disorientation, at the Air Force station Montauk Point, Long Island in 1983, having experienced not only teleportation but time travel. They claim John von Neumann met them there (although officially he died in 1957). This episode is a seminal event in another alleged secret and horrific US Government experiment into the paranormal known as the Montauk Project.
In 2003, Al Bielek's version of his participation in the Philadelphia Experiment was debunked by a small team of investigators (see the weblinks for reference), ruling him out as a real witness or survivor.
NEWSPAPER REVIEWS:-
Philadelphia Experiment News
September 21, 2000 - Death of a Legend Continued
The Scrap Metal Trading Company stated that the Eldridge was transferred to a demolition company for dismantle/destruction, and that they will try to provide more information on the name of the demolition company, and any photos they may of taken.
October 22, 1999 - Death of a Legend
I received a UPS Worldwide Express Envelope today marked Urgent. It was from a scrap metal Trading Corporation in Piraeus Greece the letter states;
"Subject: ex. USS ELDRIDGE
We have been informed of your interest for the abovementioned vessel.
We have taken the liberty to write to you this letter in order to inform you that this vessel is now under our ownership. Therefore if you would still have an interest on this vessel please contact us at the abovementioned address and numbers, preferably in Piraeus - Greece, as soon as possible."
After reading the above some basic questions my come to mind such as:
Is there any evidence that an experiment of this nature was really performed on the U.S.S. Eldridge (or any other ship) in 1943?
Did the Eldridge really "teleport" over 600 km in the blink of an eye? How could such an unusual assertion have been made?
If there really was an experiment of this nature, what happened to the men involved, and are any of the witnesses still alive after fifty years? Have any of them come forth and told their stories?
How could the Navy have kept such a technological breakthrough as implied by the PX covered up for over 50 years?
What kind of technology could have been implemented to cause the events discussed?
Were Einstein's theories really involved? Was his "Unified Field Theory" ever really "completed?"
Is the experiment still continuing behind closed doors today?
U.S.S. Eldridge, July 25, 1943
Norfolk Naval Yard - Portsmouth, December 12th, 1944
My search begins...
My fascination for the so-called �Philadelphia Experiment� started with the need for an entertaining academic diversion within Cambridge University library. I was stuck there one glum English Sunday, in search of enlightenment about the effects of the introduction of the Sweet Potato on the culture of highland New Guinea. After several hours of less than fascinating study, it struck me that, whilst surrounded by every single document ever to have been published within the shores of the British Isles (as indeed I was) there was probably some subject considerably more exciting and challenging here that I could be searching for. As I trudged from shelf to shelf, I began to covet a more glamorous and tantalizing holy grail to justify my presence there. But I wasnt quite sure what.
I was, as ever, in the company of Sparky, who was a theoretical Physicist. Or at least he was in as much as, in theory he was a physicist, though he rarely went to the trouble of putting it into practice. Never hard to distract, Sparky quickly thought of an appropriate goal for our wayward academic instincts. Inspired, I suspect, by a combination of the looming supernatural atmosphere of the Library Building (it looks not dissimilar from the temple of Gozer in Ghostbusters) and a latent guilt about not researching enough Physics, Sparky sent me looking for information about the Philadelphia Experiment.
He informed that during the second world war, the American military gathered together some of the world�s greatest physicists, and tasked them with pushing the very limits of human knowledge in an attempt to come up with some unprecedented technological advantage over the enemy which would enable them to break the current military deadlock. A scientific revolution was called for which could change the face of military history. As it happens they succeeded. Albert Einstein�s work led to the development of the atom bomb, which pretty much hit the nail on the head when it comes to physics changing the face of history. But that wasn�t the good bit. (Actually I classify atoms bombs under BAD). The mystery surrounds the other projects being worked on by Einstein, along with Dr. John von Neumann, Dr. Nikola Tesla, and others. The most intriguing of these is reported to be that work using huge magnetic fields to make warships �invisible� went rather wrong resulting in ships disappearing and reappearing instantly elsewhere having apparently experienced some kind of teleportation.
IT WAS PUBLISHED IN A DAILY JOURNAL OF NEW YORK.
Montauk Experiment.
The Philadelphia experiment originally began back in the 1930's in Chicago with three people. Dr. John Hutchinson Sr., who was the Dean of the University of Chicago, Nickola Tesla, and Dr. Kurtenaur, who was an Austrian physicist who was on staff at the University. They decided to do something with the speculation regarding the concept of things and people being invisible. This subject had been discussed for several year. They got together and did some research at the University of Chicago around 1931 or 1932. In 1933 the Institute of Advanced Studies at Princeton was formed and the project was transferred there in 1934. One of the people on staff at the Institute was Dr. John Erich Von Neumann, who was from Budapest Hungary. He got his degree in chemistry in 1925 and his Ph.D. in mathematics in 1926. He taught in Europe for about four years and transferred to the United States. He taught at the graduate level for three years and was invited to join the Institute.
Other people at the Institute included Albert Einstein, who left Germany in 1930. He went to the California Institute of Technology for three years and taught there and then went to the Institute upon their invitation and acceptance. A lot of other people showed up there as time went on. The project expanded about 1936. In the meantime, Tesla was named director of the project. He was a friend of president Franklin Roosevelt, whom Tesla met in 1917 when FDR was secretary of the Navy.
Tesla was asked at that time to do some work for the government for the war effort, which he did. He accepted and became director of the invisibility project until he resigned in 1942. In 1936, after intensive study, they decided to have an initial test of their work. They achieved some partial invisibility. The Navy and everyone else was encouraged to continue the work, and the Navy supplied money for research.
Scientists were coming to the United States from Germany until 1939, when the war with Germany was started.
In 1940, after research using Tesla's approach, they decided they were ready for a full test at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. They had a small ship and a tender ship at each side. One ship provided the power and the other supplied the drive for the coils. They were tendered to the test ship by cables. The idea was that if anything went wrong they could cut the cables or sink the test ship. Everything worked and the project was declared a success. The important point about the 1940 test is that there was no one on board the test vehicle. It was strictly a dry run with no people. This is important because of what happened later. Other people came on board. Thomas T. Brown joined the project because of his expertise in electrogravity effects. He had the task of solving the problem of the German magnetic mines that were affecting allied shipping and Naval efforts. This led into a parallel project which involved the use of deguising coils and cables to explode the mines at a distance from the ship.
The Navy wanted several people to keep an eye on the tests. That is how I got involved. Keeping technical commentaries. Let's look at Nickola Tesla.
In 1879 his father died and his first year at college ended. He came to the United States in1884. He had enormously intuitive insight. He had a perfect track record. Before coming to the US he had known Robert Oppenheimer, who later worked with the development of the atomic bomb, and Dr. David Hilbert, the mathematician who devised equations for Hilbert Space, which described multiple space or multiple realities mathematically.
These equations for multiple space became very important in the project. Dr. von Neumann met Hilbert in 1927 and retained a lot of what he had learned. With that, Von Neumann developed other new systems of mathematics. Von Neumann was considered to be one of the most outstanding mathematicians in this century. Some think he was better than Einstein. Another mathematician involved was Dr. John Levinson, who was born in 1912. He died in 1976. He published three books on mathematics. Levinson developed the so-called Levinson Time Equations. with all this behind them, the group had all they needed to proceed with the project.
After the successful 1940 test, the Navy decided to give the project unlimited funds and to classify the project. In 1942 Tesla was given a ship and a crew for a full sized test. Tesla got a battleship. Tesla and Von Neumann didn't agree on some things. Tesla insisted that they were going to have a very severe problem with personnel. Tesla wanted more time but the NAVY wouldn't agree. Tesla made periodic announcements in the late 1930's and early 1940's about his contact with off planet species. He was in contact with the outside, who agreed that there was a problem with the people. He decided to sabotage the 1942 test in an attempt to stop the project. He de-tuned the equipment so nothing would work. The test failed. Tesla then turned the project over to Von Neumann in March 1942 and left the project.
Von Neumann went to the Navy and requested time to study the problem to determine what had gone wrong. Von Neumann decided to make changes in some of the equipment. He decided he would need a special ship that was designed from the ground up. The Eldridge was selected. The equipment was built into the ship. They put all the equipment on the ship. October 1942 arrived. They selected 33 volunteers for the crew, who arrived after graduation in December 1942. We still have a picture of the class.
After the ship was out of drydock work began. In May of 1943 von Neumann installed a third generator. It would never synchronize with the other two. It went out of control one day and zapped one of the men. Von Neumann pulled out the third generator (installed because Tesla had convinced Von Neumann of the potential problem with people) and went back to the original design. In mid June, the ship had sea trials. On July 22, 1943, they had the test. The ship between radar and optically invisible. They discovered people very disoriented. The Navy pulled the crew off and consulted Von Neumann, who requested more time again from the Navy. The Navy, after consultation with higher-ups, announced that the drop dead date was on the 12th of August, 1943. Von Neumann voiced his concern that it wasn't enough time.
The Navy decided that it just wanted radar invisibility and not optical invisibility. The equipment was again modified by Von Neumann. August 12th arrived. We knew things were not right. The test began, and for about a minute everything was all right. The ships outline could be seen in the water. There was suddenly a blue flash and the ship disappeared entirely. No radio communication was possible. It was gone. In about three hours it came back. One of the masts was broken.
Some personnel were partially embedded in the steel deck. Others were fading in and out. Some disappeared entirely. Many were insane. The Navy extracted the crew and proceeded with four days of meetings to decided what to do about the problem. They decided there would be one more test with another dry run without personnel. They conducted the dry run using about 1000 feet of cable attached to another ship. In late October 1943 the test occurred. The ship disappeared for about 20 minutes. When it returned, they found equipment missing. Two transmitter cabinets and one generator was missing. The cabinet with the zero-time reference generator was intact. At that point, the Navy stripped the ship and stopped the project. The Eldridge served in the war and was turned over to Greece at the end of the war.
The important thing is that there were two tests that were exactly 40 years apart to the day. It was a 40 year separation in hyperspace. Now, the Earth itself has a biorhythm that peaks on a 20 year cycle on August 12th. It "just happened" to peak and provided the connecting link through the fields of the Earth for the two experiments to lock up in hyperspace. Walk-in efforts are aided if they occur during this peak.
The ship was pulled into hyperspace. We were inside the ship and knew something was drastically wrong with the test. We tried to shut it off but it wouldn't shut off. We ran out on deck and jumped over the side of the ship. We jumped overboard but ended up in a time tunnel which ended at Montauk, Long Island on August 12th, 1983. At night.
We were found very quickly and taken down stairs, where Von Neumann greeted us. He expected us. It was a bit of a shock. We had just been in 1943 and now we were in 1983 looking at Von Neumann as an old man. He said that there was a hyperspace lockup and that we had to go back and shut off the generators on the ship or the hyperspace rift would keep increasing and possibly engulf the planet. He had been waiting 40 years for us to arrive.
Montauk sent us back and we smashed the equipment with axes. The ship returned to its original point in space and about three hours later in time. From 1943 on, Von Neumann didn't know what happened. He had modified earlier equipment in 1943 to where he had a full blown time machine. The Germans also were working on time travel, and had it working in 1945 just before the end of the war. This is all a matter of record.
After the Navy decided to shut down the project in 1943, Von Neumann was sent to work on the atomic bomb project at Los Alamos until that was over. In 1947 there were major changes in the Department of Defense. Someone in the new structure decided to dig up the Philadelphia project to see if they could find out what went wrong. They asked Von Neumann to "take another look" at the project. He agreed.
There is another matter. Starting about August 6th, 1943, UFOs appeared over the Eldridge for about six days. They were there during the test. One of the UFOs was sucked up into hyperspace with the Eldridge and it ended up in an underground facility in Montauk in 1983. It contained a charging device which some aliens made us go back and get for them, as they didn't want humans to have it. We don't know who they were. Pruett was concerned about an alien invasion.
Also, Von Neumann was called by the government to come and assist in the examination of a crashed UFO in 1947 at Aztec. Another crash occurred at Aztec about a year later. The first crash had greys on it and none survived. At least one occupant survived the second crash. The radar systems unintentionally brought down the craft. Radar was used intentionally after that until the aliens got wise to it.
The occupant of the second crash was not a grey, and Von Neumann got to talk with it. Von Neumann asked it what the answer to the invisibility problems could be. He learned that he had to go back and do his homework in metaphysics. The nature of the problem was that the personnel on the ship were not locked to the zerotime reference of the ship. Humans are normally locked to the point of conception as a time reference, not a zero-time reference. The time stream lock allows the person to flow in synch with the system so interaction is possible.
Time locks are fragile. All the power of the project disrupted the time-locks of the people on the deck on the ship. When the ship came back in time, the people didn't come back to the same reference.
Von Neumann realized that he needed a computer, as well as some knowledge of metaphysics in order to be able to lock the time reference of the people to the time reference of the ship. He built a computer in 1950 for the purpose. It was ready to be installed in 1952 and a test was performed in 1953 that was successful. They didn't go floating off into space when it was over. At this point, the Navy canceled Project Rainbow and changed the name to project Phoenix.
Alot came out of the negative effects of the Rainbow project. Some of it led to mind control research programs in the Phoenix project. The invisibility research produced some Stealth technology as well as other highly classified projects.
In 1983, they decided to apply mind control to all participants in these projects in an effort to cover them up. They had also been working on another project: age regression. Now, Tesla had sought back in the 1940's to develop equipment that could help the members of the crew after they lost time-lock . The government developed it into the age regression program. It was physical age regression. A person retained the memory they had from the older age.
Tesla's theory was that if you took the individual's time-lock and moved it forward in time than you would remove aging. That's what happened. It took between 30 and 60 days for the body to complete the change to the new time reference.
When our astronauts first landed on the moon in 1969 they were greeted by a fleet of disks sitting on the rim of a crater. The astronauts asked their superiors if they knew about these disks. They were told "yes", that they were American disks. The astronauts were angry at being used as public relations men by the government.
Well, the aircraft combines two aspects for invisibility. One of the aspects relates to the construction and coating applied to the surface. The other aspect relates to an electronic type of invisibility package which is a result of work done on the Philadelphia experiment years ago. Also, the stealth has a secondary drive system which is very advanced and allows it to fly in space. The assistant director of NASA admitted that this came straight out of alien technology. He admitted this to the public.
There are breaks in the government secrecy programs that are starting to show up. More and more people are getting totally disgusted with government activities and attitudes and they are beginning to talk.
The Phoenix Project was a project that evolved out of the Philadelphia Project. It was a project that the Navy did in the 1930's and 1940's in an attempt to make ships invisible. They threw the switch one eventful day and the ship went into hyperspace. They had all sorts of problems with the people on the boat. It was a huge success as well as a huge failure - then they shelved it. Around 1947 it was decided to re-activate the project and it was moved to Brookhaven National Laboratories with Dr. John Von Neumann and his associates. Out of Phoenix I came Stealth technology. It also produced all sorts of energetic little toys like the radiosonde.
The radiosonde was a little white box that they attached to a balloon and sent up into the atmosphere. The government told people that it involved gathering weather data. It used a very unusual type of pulse modulation. In most cases they used a CW (continuous wave) oscillator and pulsed the signal. This turned out to be a very efficient conversion of electrical energy to etheric energy. They were designed up at Brookhaven National Labs. I started to talk to people at Brookhaven and ran into a retired gentleman who used to work there. He told me that the design was originally done by Wilhelm Reich.
The story goes that in about 1947 Wilhelm Reich handed the US Government a weather control device, a device that would do DOR-busting. Reich thought that if he could decrease the amount of DOR that storms would not be so violent. (DOR is the result of orgone energy coming into contact with an enclosed radioactive source). Deadly Orgone Energy is DOR. The government sent the device up into a storm and it did reduce the intensity of the storm. They worked.
The Montauk Project was a combination of Wilhelm Reich's work and the Philadelphia Experiment. There were two separate projects going on in Phoenix One. You had the invisibility aspect and you had the development of Wilhelm Reich's weather control. Toward the end of the Phoenix project, by using some of Wilhelm Reich's concepts and some of the transmission schemes used from the "radiosonde" project, they found that you could combine the two -factors and use them for 'Mind Control'.
The people who were running it went to the military and proposed that they could use it to "influence the minds of the enemy". The military loved the idea, and let them use the old Montauk Air Force Base. Among the equipment requested was an old SAGE radar unit, which was on the base. The base was shut down and everything was auctioned off. The group then moved in from the Brookhaven Labs. That began what we call Phoenix Two. They spent the first ten years from about 1969 to about 1979, researching pure mind control.
The first part of the mind control project was to take an individual and stand them about 250 feet away from the antenna. The SAGE radar had a peak pulse power of .5 MW. The antenna had a gain of 30db. That means an effective radiated power of at least a gigawatt. It was nominally a gigawatt. Can you imagine what that would do to people? I think its amazing these people are still here. It does things like burn out brain functions, create neurological damage, scar lungs from heat, etc. They tried this with a number of people and there were few survivors. The subjects were often indigent people they grabbed off the streets.
The project was controlled by Dr. John Von Neumann and Jack Pruett. About 30 people worked there. It was a joint project...Air Force & Navy. Original funding came from the Nazi government funds. In 1944 there was an American troop train that went through a French railroad tunnel carrying $10 billion in Nazi gold which they had found.
It was $10 billion at the 1944 price of $20 per ounce. The train was blown up in the tunnel. It killed 51 American soldiers. The gold turned up ten years later at Montauk. This has been verified. That money was used to finance the project for many years as the value of gold went up.
They spent all of it and ran out of money. That's when they tapped on ITT, who funded it. ITT was owned by Krupp in Germany. In terms of personnel, many of the civilians and scientists there were all ex-Nazi's who came from Germany both before and after the war ended.
The project was under US Government surveillance. The intelligence community knew what was going on and the CIA monitored everything, as did other government intelligence agencies. The field of players who actually operated on the base was small, between 30 and 50.
The funding was entirely private. After 1983, Senator Goldwater found out about it and started an investigation. He couldn't find any trace of government funding. Pruett was the metaphysical director of the project. He was Air Force. After he left Dr. Herman C. Untermann took over. They had an electronics expert, Dr. Mathew E. Zerrett, who came over from Germany in 1946 with Werhner von Braun. Probably the reason that they ran out of money is that they had a total of 25 bases around the United States to support. The last of the bases shut down August 12, 1983. The base at Montauk, where all the stations got their zero-time reference from, shut down and the other two remaining bases went down with it.
Other experiments included time travel. No one has picked up a tangible future beyond 2012 AD. There is a very abrupt wall there with nothing on the other side. A working time vortex was created to the future.
At one point a creature came through and everyone went into a panic. They shut the transmitter off. The creature ate people and equipment. They had to go back and shut down the unit in Philadelphia in order to shut off the unit in the future so they could stop this creature in 1983. This was on August 12,1983. The vortex locked on to the 12 August 1943 test and formed a loop.
Posted by STEVE at 8:25 PM 0 comments
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
· ▼ 2008 (1)
o ▼ November (1)
§ TEST 1
· ► 2007 (1)
About Me
STEPHEN JEFFREY
View my complete profile
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Friday, January 28, 2011
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
BLOG THE BOOK 2
skip to main | skip to sidebar
DR STEVES MOST EXCELLENT FUDGE.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
The Four Spiritual Laws - Flash
Posted by STEVE at 10:45 PM 0 comments
Friday, April 9, 2010
TRANSLATION
Translation
Free Translation
Sunday, February 21, 2010
BLOG THE BOOK 2
If as I believe my thoery is true and it will be accepted by one compentant judge it will be a considerable step in science.Charles Darwin............No that I say Darwinism is right just that I think this quote applies equally to a thoery of ex-nihilo creation.
My theory of everything for WASP..
Steve Jeffreys collary to the law of non contradiction.
Opposite particles X and Y cannot be in the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME in the SAME PLACE THE EXCEPTION PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG...
FOUR STATES ARE ONE PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG AND THE FOUR FORCES DEPEND ON THE FOUR STATES SO THEY ARE ALSO ONE.
E=MC^2 depends on momentum an momentum is determined by state.
This is a means for a Big crunch to store the potential energy of a prexisting universe and release it as Kinetic energy in the big bang.
The mechanism is super critical non newtoinan fluids or four states of matter in one.....................
This give you a mechanism for the big bang you can use WASP To calculate the potential energy of the prexisting universe and the kinetic energy of the big bang.
You asked me to give you a thoery it is simplified it does not include determinism.
Determinism in the early universe maks it too complicated.Suffice to say qantum effects did not kick in until after the Big Bang everything prior to that was determinism rather than randomness.
The reason being is as you go back in time order or reverse entropy increases and becomes infinite.
I can argue there is no need for God but I don't want to.
And that is the characteristic of every true believer they want to believe.
Steve.
The universal energy equation is 2+2=4 Over a cycle the big bang and the big crunch have to balance 2+2=4.
But due to thermodynamics a little energy is lost with each cycle like a bouncing ball.
And to balance 2+2 so that it equals four we have to increase mass as it goes backward in time.
So that with infinite time we have infinite mass.Which EInstein said was a dealbreaker.............
Infinite mass is an impossibility.
And since it is the only way to make 2+2=4 balance.
Then there is another way that is for energy to be fetched like a bucket of water from dimension X nihilo.
Creative energy is fetched from ex-nihilo making the big bang balance for the universal energy equation 2+2=4.
Einsteins second equation for mass approaching the speed of light includes momentum.
And momentum is determined by state so when four states are one E=MC^2 is a different equation for prior to the big bang.
The universe doesn't balance it cannnot balance because it is an impossibility for mass to increase as you go backward in time.
Until it becomes an infinite mass universe..............
That means 2+2 does not equal four for the big bang.......The difference from four can be axactly calculated.............
And equations don't balance for 2+2=4 E=MC^2 doesn't balance for 2+2=4.
And maybe this is an atrifact of the original non balancing equation for energy...................
Of course there are three alternatives creaton exnihilo where the equation balances with energy from outside the universe.
A balanced universe where mass increases with energy lost from the bouncing ball.
An unbalanced universe where energy is lost but is not replaced...............
And for my money it is an unbalanced universe.
And that would be a bad bet.
But if you want to believe 2+2 does not equal four for the energy of the universe.
Then it is a good bet for an evolutionist.
That all equations should not balance but need an adjustment.
To get a thoery of everything.
So go ahead adjust 2+2=4 to agree with the universe.
And see if all equations make sense in one big unbalanced theory of everything.http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/bounce/energy.html
2+2=4 does not balance for 2 bounces+ 2 bounces= 4 Bounces.
Because energy is lost as heat.
Hence the ball eventually stops bouncing.
We can apply this to the occillatng universe theory....................
for 2+2=4 for the cycles of the universe big crunch big bang.Mass has to increase as you go backward in time..........
And with time that goes on forever there has to be infinite mass..
You have to start with 100% mass.
And it will eventually reach zero......................If the equation balances.
Two answers for everything can't be right because the bible said that two is the number of enmity with God.
So it could hardly be the answer to everything.
So it muts be possible to add two answers in 1/3s to get one answer.............
1/3 YING+ 1/3 YANG+ 1/3 YANG= 1
There is nothing wrong with the 1/3rd equation except that it makes two equations one.
And sometimes this is juts not possible. QM AND GR will work in tandem 2+2=4 for all but a few equations involvng the graviton.....................
Maybe it is possible to use the third equation to unify even these equatons involving the graviton into one equation for everything.
1/3 STRING THEORY+ 1/3 QM+ 1/3 GR= 1
This makes the three major thoeries not three seperate theories but one super theory.
Steve.
A model is a good model if it.
1. is elgant.
2.Contains few artbitrary or adjustable elements.
3. Agrees with and explains all existing observations.(including inflation)
4. Makes details predictions about future observations that can disprove or falsify the model if they are not borne out.
Hawkings model of 10^500 different universes with different laws cannot be observed so only one universe can be observed which my thoery explains adequately.
A particle such as a primordial atom cannot both be born and die at the same time without having a half life.
The particle started out as four states in one and it muts have started out as four states which became one in the big crunch.The thoery is when four states are one four forces also unify.Thus potential energy of the big crunch is converted into kintetic energy of the big bang.Or potential energy ex-nihilo creates one state of matter that is four states in one.That is the description of the primordial atom.
And in the big bang since there is no time it dies before it is born the concepts birth and death of the particle and half life have no meaning and are all mixed togther.
Time is mised togther past presnet and future.
Time must have existed from the very begining.
The paricle reaches a point whee times arror begins where it cannot go back and do it all over again
It can't go back to it's state of non existance it has to live and therefore it has to die.
There is a point where it can still return to the void from which it came............
It is TESTABLE because there is a point where the four states are two states in one.
And where they are four states in one 2+2=4.
/4=1
Gravity then reverses and becomes a superforce.
The direction of gravity can change back for a time then it becomes critical and it reaches the point where it cannot go back to the previous four states without an explosion of the primodordial particle.
Time in this case is the direction of gravitys arrow and time runs backwards beyond this point to the big crunch.
The blog is great.
And I really like it.
It is so good that I will end it right here.
And it has only just begun.
Because it one mans seearch for everything.
And it is a blog book and it can be as long as I want it to be.
Or as short as I would like it to be.
And that is as short as it is already.
Because I already have a blog book.
And my blog was deleted.
And there is no point in writing a blog if it gets deleted.
And maybe I could fin it on some disc.
But Jessu doesn't want a parrot I can always start another blog.
And it will be juts as good.
But people will always encroach upon my style.
They will always say he has no sense of appropriateness.
And I cannot even spell it.
And my grammer is bad it is just so utterly boring.
And that is intelligent design it is so boring I don't even want tgo think about it.
It is so utterly boring.
And that is what my blog is.
It is utterly and completely boring.
Without a little help from jesus.
He is my rock.
And he is my fortress.
In Him will I trust.
And I don't need to be a parrot anymore adn think that that is what God wants from me just someone to write books.
Gods gift is for my love and my pleasure is to help one I love.
And God helps me to help myself.
And that is a great thing.
Because if anyone knows he exists I do yet I waste my time chasning rainbows.
That is what a thoery of everything really is.
It is chasing ghosts or windmills it is a glorious and futile quest.
God has already told us it came out of nothing.
And ex-nihilo is a satisfactory explaination for how the universe began.
And they don't like it because they believe in the big bang.
And they don't.
And I'm not sure that the big bang is what the bible means when it says ex-nihilo.
I'm pretty sure the problems with the big bang as as big as making something out of nothing with noone in charge.
And if you ever tried to make something with no one in charge you will know you don't get anything worthwhile.
You need a teacher to help you to make something.
Otherwise you just get a footstool for someones foot.
That is not very good.
And it is great if you have done it yourself.
And that is what this blog is all about I have done it myself with a little help from the Lord.
And it has been like a parrot and it has been like a footstool.
It is has been my own work.
ANd God helped me to think clearly about the big bang.
And no one ever thinks clearly about it.
And my heor is John hartnett who thnks clearly about everything.
He thinks about whether the bible is true.
And if it is is true how does that effect the thoery.
And his book about the big bang is just about the best book I have ever read.
Except for Hawkings when he believed there was a God.
But his latest book is juts bable.
bable to 10^500th power that is how much nonsense it takes to make a multiverse.
And thi skind of nonsense is what my computer porgram produces.
So I have succeeded in physics but not as I have hoped I have shown string thoery to be nonsense and not the answer to heaven and hell.
Because there is limbo and that makes 4 dimensions + 3 and that is 7.
And that is a good thoery because it agrees with all the observations.
And it is elegant.
And above all this blog is elegant.
It is a thoery of everything in a nutshell.
It is consise and doesn't contain ambigiuities.
Stating it simply and explaining everything is what science does.
It is occams rasor.If it is the simplist explaination it is probably right.
And that is why science is always wrong.
Because the simplist explaination is that God did it.
And He wants to show us how to work it out.
And He doesn't.
He wants us to have faith faith is all the proof we need.
And after examining the big bang cross examining the witnesses it is clear that they are blind dumb and stupid and that they have seen nothing.
And that the bible when it is sais nothing.
Means someone.
Not something.
We just may leave it there.We won't be a parrot.But we will will use this blog to explain our theory of everything.The circular dimensions include time.
And to convert four into three you use my time formula which converts 0 eccentricity into 0.02..............
And my forumula is very accurate within six minutes per year of sidereal time...................
So converting string theory is a matter of converting a circular orbit of 360 days in ten dimensions to an eliptical orbit of 365 days and three dimensions.....................
Then you can put string theory together with Einsteins like twister theory.
Draw a 360 day circular earth orbit in 10 dimensions with an eccentricity of zero convert to an eccentricty of 0.002 using my time formula.
Then the ten dimenesions will be expressed in three dimensions.
The devil doesn't want God to make it right.
And God can take any lemon and make lemonaide.
And God can take any situation and make it right.
And faith without work is dead and it was never intended to discourage.
But it be a sawhorse that if you don't have work you can't make a difference.
And of course you can do whatever comes to hand.
And whatever you find that you are good at you should do with all of your heart.
And if you find anything to do.
You should just quit.
And that isn't life to give up.
There is always something to do that matters.
Like blogging which does not matter even a little bit.
If I blog or don't blog life goes much the same.
And life always goes better with a blog.
I searched for everything and I found a theory of everything.
But it did not go to plan.
I expected others would share my passion.
And that they would take an interest in what I was doing.
They did not share my passion and they did not take an interest.
So what is the point of telling the world in a blog.
How dissapointed Iam.
Iam dissapointed that no one understands.
And I should not expect anyone to understand my blog because I speak in tongues.
And I might speak my heavenly fathers own language.
And it makes no sense to unbelievers.
And that means to born again christians because they don't understand tongues anymore than anyone else.
Tongues of angels and they don't understand my lack of love.
And if they had been alone for all these years they would understand.
As God understands that lonelyness is hard to overcome.
Because the lonely don't make good friends.
And other people ar lonely and they want someone to be their friend.
But you have to want more than just a friend.
And life is like that you have to be interested in more than one thing.
And Iam only interested in little things.
That interest me.
And that is just the way Iam.
I like one little thing and not a lot of things.
But I could try to like other things but then there would not be time for the things that interest me.
And there is all the time in the world for the things Iam interested in.
But no time for anything that is outside my little universe.
1/ Einsetins dice can make QM and GR one by unifying classical theories like Maxwells and EInsteins with QM.Making randomness orderely
2/ 2+2=4 program produces one equation for everything.
3/ Clock equation makes 10 dimensions 3 dimensions.
The hope of doing somethign that matters is just a hope.
But it keeps people from unhappiness.
And it kept me bored and unhappy.
So what is hope is it hope for the future.
or is it hope for the present.
We can hope that here is something for us right now.
Rather than hope for something in the future that never will come to pass.
They say that girls were wrong to play ping pong and they didn't know that they were chineese girls and everything in the chineese language is reversed is reversed.
And that means we can convert Einsteins theory of eliptical orbits of the earth into a circular orbit of ten dimensions effectiviely converting Eintein to string and back again.
And this Steves most excellent fudge.
And clock is a memorial stones to the God is Israel who proved hawking wrong for the final time.
And there is no hawking.
Because there is a God of israel.
And the God of israel has declared war on Stephen hawking.
And it is the other way around.
God still loves Stephen and has done everything to make his life better.
And he is not grateful instead he blames God for his sickness.
And he has never said that God is to blame.
But he feels hurt that God has not made him better.
And maybe one day it will be nnot as Stephen haking Hopes.
Because life can be like that.
It can be not as we have hoped but we still succeed we still overcome.
And Hawking has to accept that it will be not as he had hoped but it be even better.
because it may be better than he had hoped.
New technolgy may mean he can control his computer with his mind.
And he may not be finished with his books.
It may be not as God hoped for the next one one to prove 2+2=4 right.
Becaus ehis next one will prove God wrong.
And if it does prove God right that it will be not as Hawking had hoped.
But he can't deny the evidence.
And that is exactly what I hope that the evidence form my computer program is so convincing that even Hawking will admit there is a God.
And my thoery o converting a ten dimnsional circle into an elipse.
Is impossible and if it is imnpossible then my clcok doesn't make sense.
And that is quite possible that my clock is not more accurate than sidereal time.
But six minutes out.
and if it is out it is not a conversion of a circle into an elipse.
But if it is not out then the six minutes is significant.
ANd makes a difference when you convert a ten dimesionsional circle into a 3 dimensional elipse.
But it is imossible M theory is impossible and it might because you CANNOT convert Ten dimensions into three.
If you could then Einstein could be converted into ten dimesions.
And that would be just as I had hoped.
That it is impossible.
And it might not be I might have hoped M theory could make sense in four dimensions.
being a fan of twister theory at least I know what I like.
And four dimensions is what I like...........
I don't like ten I can't understand ten so I don't believe they exist I cannot observe them therefore they are not science.
I can observe four dimensions of an eliptical orbit.
And all of the orbits in other universes must be circular.
And if they are then the other universes are unstable and will fall apart.
But they must be circular if they contain more than three dimesions.
And hawking has not thought this through.
And I have on his behalf.
We can convert one dimension and that is time.
Time can be in ten dimensions and it is still 360 days.
But if the orbit is unstable the number of days is not the same.
And when we convert it to an elipse it is an orbit which never could exist
If we convert the nine other dimenisons from circular to eliptical then we would be cooking with gas.
We wuold have the formula to convert Einsteins thoery to string theory and back again.
But we ccan't convert none dimesions like we can the one dimension of time.
Time really can be converted from circular to eliptical the number of degrees equals the number of days.
And this orbit in unstable and it might be a much more stable orbit than the earth is actually in.
Because it is perfect.
Whereas the earths orbit involves a wobble.
Which may not always have existed before the flood.
Th eearth is tilted if it were not tiled maybe my clock would be 100% accurate.
Because it is a theoretical perfect elipse based on a prefect circular orbit.
And it measn nothing.And it just might mean everything.
The fact that it is so close to sidereal time.And that is just a coincidence.
But if you getvthe right answer any other time is it a coicidence or is your working right.I think my working is right.
And if it is a coersion of time then it is alos a conversion of space.
That is one thing that is very clear baout converting a circle into an elipse it is converting time and space.
So it is converting dimension as well.
If the circular dimension is more than three then converting to an elipse will convert it to three.
And it must be some kind of mistake or an impossibility.
And maybe converting dimesions form ten to three is impossible.
And it might totally as easy as jujst converting time.
That may convert space as well.
Then my clock is a thoery of everything.
And that is what the clock always has been Newtons theory of everything.
And Newton is dead but he still speaks through the clock.
Because this kind of orbit was his idea.
And it goes back to another man.
Who lived a long time ago.
Becaus eorbits have been calculated from the year dot.
And they have been converted from before time itself.
So it not going to lead to a time machine.
There I ahve said it now it is not going to happen.
And I could take that attitude that be mentioning that you convert then dimensions to three that means you can travel through other dimensions.
And it might mean just that.
If man were that clever that he could figure out how to travel through time/space.
And if he is meant to travel faster than light then one day someone will come ujp with a better theory about how to do it.
But my theory is just to convert dimensions on paper.
And it is a map.
of the universe.
And iof ten dimesions are unstable then the eleipse genereated from an unstable circular orbit will also be unstable.
And an elipse is not an unstable orbit.
But it can be wrong.
But a perfect orbit cannot really exist.So it is only a hyothetical.
And it is a really good fusge.
Because there a better way to convert a circle into an elipse and that is eccentricity.
And if it works why hasn't someone thought about it before.
No one has because you can't convert a perfect circle into a perfect elipse.
And you can't convert a perfect circle into an imperfect elipse.
It is all about perfection myt time equation is 100% right.
Where the earths orbit is slightly wrong.
And the earth orbit must be right just the way it is.
Then my clock is six minutes out and the six minutes will be shown to be an important calculation taht has to do with imperfection.
Because the earth will be more perfect that a conversion of a circle into an elipse.
Perhaps it is ID that six minutes it is necessary on a bike that is a bell.
ANd is that six minuets necessary in earths orbit it sure is necessary.
So if the clock is wrong there is not much point is trying to convert space as well as time.
Because it will give the right answer for space.
And nothing could be closer to the truth.
It may not be the right answer for the earth but it will be the rigth answer for time/space.....
Take the clock and shove it.
I would if it knew where to put it because it doesn't suit the mantle of any university.
They don't want to know about a bible Pi clock because you can't use Pi or the bible to calculate time.
let alone both.
And it is both and it is right.The earth may have had a circular orbit in the begining which dcayes into an eliptical one.
And that is very possible if you know what you are talking about.
because the more you know about orbits the better off you would be.
But a circular orbit cannot decay into an elipse.
And if it can why can't it be true.
That the earth started about at 360 days in duration.
So we have five days difference and that is not six minutes.
But you can convert a circular orbit into an elipse.
And that is just it.
You can.
Now at the begining of the 21st century faced with scienitfic claims like neo-Darwinism and the multiverse (many universes) hypothesis in cosmology invented to avoid the overwhelming evidence for puprose and design found inmodern science the Catholic Church will again defend human nature by proclaiming the the immanent deisgn in nature is real Archbishop of Vienna.Quote fromHawkings book page 163.
The book is finished.
And it really is.
I have no more to say about the subject.
And Iam going to end the book.
Because a blog book does not need to bevery long.
It can be very interesting.
If it is kept short.
And the best thing about my blog book is everything I have written.
Because ntohing that I have written has been greater than a blog.
And everything I have written has just been the greater gift of blogging.
And everythig is right about blogging.
It means the glory goes to God.
And everybody who reads this blog shall enjoy it.
A unstable circular orbit in ten dimensions can be covnerted to a stable eliptical orbit in three dimensions.
If as the experts believe this equation is not reversible and Einsteins four dimensions of space time cannot be converted to ten.
Then string theory is proved wrong by the law of reversibility a thoery has to work in reverse for it to work at all.
Correct me if Iam wrong but I think this is like Jesus is the way the truth and the life something undeniable.
This proves the multiverse wrong also that hawking believes in instead of God.
Because it requires ten spacial dimensions to work.
ALexander hardigan had lost emma he no longer cared about life.
And that is what you have to be like to try to build a time machine.You have tyo be tired of living.
And alexander knew the patent clerk.
And he had an equation E=MC^2.
And that was in three dimesions.So he thought of adding a fourth dimension time.
And then reversing the equation for conversion of a circular 360 day orbit of the earth to an eliptical 365 day orbit.
Where the circular orbit is in higher dimesions and unstable.
But when it is converted to an eliptical orbit it is stable.
And it is instabilty which makes time travel possible.
Now it is aload of twaddle but we have to make a movie and we have to have stuff on a blackboard.
So ALex doesn't define time like Einsteins but as an eliptical orbit using Newtons equations.
Because time is absolute and he has a clock that proves this.
And that is is what movies are all about.
The scientist has a clock that proves you can travel in time.
ANd of course it proves the opposite.
So he has to reverse the equations so he can reverse time.
I need not have worrried I can't stop anyone from building a time machine and I can't help themdo it either.
If they built it by it'svery nature it would be something that is meant to be and could not be changed before the fect.
Because causualty would be in the future and it would strech back to when that phone call was smade.
And nothing could cause the phone call to not be made.
Except ereasing Alexs blackboard.
And so very serious Alex has a blackboard with pictures of an eliptical orbit and a circular orbit in ten dimensions.And has equations that convert ten dimesions of time/space to four dimensions.
And it is nonsense.
And it really might be nonsense just somehting I thought up to go along with the clock.
The clock must prove something.
And it might as well prove it all.
And anything thta is a little toe can prove it all.
Einsteins dice can prove it all Alexander could have had Einsteins dice.
And they obey classical rules like 1 ODD THROW+1 EVEN THROW= 2 ODD THROWS.
and 2 ODD THROWS+2 EVEN THROWS=4 EVEN THROWS.
And this unifies quantum mechnanics randomness with Einsteins order.
And thus you can predict the future of particles.
And if you can predict the future maybe you can travel into it.
And that is what Alexander put on the blackboard.........
and it is just for fun and it is not fun that is when it gets crazy when it is no longer fun to go back.
When it an obessession with changing something like Emmas death.
Then it very dark.
And it is a question about why he can't change it.
And the Morlock gave the answer that in the future he had with emma it was another universe where the timemachine did not exist.
So the timemachine caused emmas death.
and that is as positive as you can be about time travel it will cause the very thing you are trying so hard to prevent.
And that is negative.
It will change something but what is it that you are going to change.
is it the whole thing.
Or is is just emmas death.
Alex hardigan added two circular orbits in ten dimesions to two eliptical orbits in three dimension and got four dimensions.
he got an extra dimension which is time.
And nobody cna answer the question what was on ALexs Blackboard becaus eno one can actually travel through time.
I will reserve my judgement on the quantum telephone whethe rit works and cannot change anything.
But it must work by going two ways which means reversing the equation and converting four diemnsions into 2 lots of ten and 2 lots of three.
Which is a total of 26 dimensions.
and this the number of Alex hardigan if he ever builds his quantum telephone.
I would prefer to believe it is a delusion of granduer and that timetravel even quantum is impossible.
But the fact that a telephone is a quantum device as well as a classical one takes it out the realm of science fiction.
But it would ruin everything.And it might ruin all kinds of things.
Or maybe the nature of things is that it could change nothing.That nothing could be corrected.And that everything would already have happened.
ANd thats hard to understand because when the future and the past are joined by a telphone.The future is fixed like in revelations it is written and cannot be changed.
because you cna write it down at the other end of the telphone.
So I hope Iamnot runing everything by talking about my experiences with telephone calls from the future.I know that I cannot remember anything about the future.
And maybe that is just the right thing that I don't remember what I was told.
Because if I did remember I would try to change history.
And it cannot be changed.
And that is for the best...................
Dailtone wrote a script about the quantum telephone and it was a great script.
People needed to know when they would die.
So perhaps the call from the future was made after my death.
That would make sense because then notghing could be changed.
It is ineviatble that they will call people after they are dead.
Because peoplewho are bad wants to talk with the dead.
And the bible forbids this kind of communicatioon.
And quantum telephones are ruled out because of Einsteins theory of relativity.
And they might require absolute time as with newtons equations.
And that is the best science science that rules it out.
I would rule it out too as a mental abberation or a hoax.
And either is possible.
A girlcan be so right that she is wrong...............She is 100% right for you so she is 100% wrong as well.
That is what my theory of four states in one and four forces being one as a consequence.
It is so right to believe the equation for the universe must balance.
That is wrong.
And the way on which it is wrong is exnihilo.
Everthing must come form nothing which is an unbalanced thermodynamic equation.
But if energy comes fromanother dimension that it can balance with matter.
As E=MC^2 so energy is equal to matter..
And the delaer deals the cards and the delaer has dealt the cards that Iam playing with.
And maybe it is a bad hand.
But I will make the most of it that is all anyone can do.
I have been dealt a bad hand that is what faraday could have said that I don't have any skill at math.
But he didn't say he could not do science.
Just because he could not do experiments.And I can only do thought experiments.
But they are good and they are enough to make a thoery work.
And that is just it this is a bad hand.
And you have been dealt a better hand so share someof your cards with me.
That is what people never think of doing because they are competitive.
and don't let me start on Hamburger University it is a university where they study all kinds of Physics without the MATH.
It is Faradays Hamburger University where kids that are B level students can study and get a degree in physics.
An associate diploma. And they can go from B-A and study a graduate diploma where some of the math is attempted at a B level.
And you can't teach math to a dog and that is the joke that they made on the elegant universe.
And can make an attempt to teach physics maths at a B level.
ANd anything is possible.
There could be another faraday.
And lets hope so but it will be not as we have hoped........
And it always is more than we expect.
And often it is less than we expect.
But Faradays university of B level physics is for average students to take physics as far as it possible for them to go.And take it no further than their abilities allow.
It is a dream that is a nightmare.
For practicing physics professors.
Because they want you to learn everything BEFORE You study physics.
And that is totally right so right that it is totally wrong.
YOu don't have to learn everything before you make up your first theory.
You shoud make up your first theory in physics on day one.
And always remember that it was wrong.
BecauseMonday, May 12, 2008
MAN WITH EINSTEINS MISSION 2
The interesting thing is I have no idea what Iam doing.
And of course I think Iam doing something good.
And Iam right Iam really doing a good thing.
And If I was wrong I would only be adding to the trouble people have.
And there is plenty of toruble.
But I can't add one little thing to peoples troubles.
And I can only do them good.
And that is what I should believe.
If Iam to write more because I should be convinced that I first do no harm.
And Iam not certain about that.
And everyone who is not certain has to have faith that what they mean for good won't be turned to evil.
And it my faith that has changed everything.
Because I did not know why I was doing a thing.
And now I think I dod understand.
Although I may be wrong.
But regardless of that I think I know the truth.
About why Einstein is wrong.
And of course there is no truth about why Einstein is wrong.
And there really is a good explaination of why his maths doesn't work.
For all the other theories that have to make sense as well.
They all have to be non contradiction.
And only Einsteins thoery has to be contradiction since it makes one of everything.
And you can't make one of everything without having contradictions.
But they are small.
And in fact they are very large.
And very many.
And they don't make sense.
Unless we complelety change the foundation of mathematics.
And that is what we have done.
And we have left the foundation as Aristotle and tried to prove Einsteins theory with Aristotle and of course this doesn't work.
Einstein and Aristotle are two different things.
That means Einstein and ordinary mathematics are two different things.
And there are problems ordinary maths breaks down at the big bang Einsteins thoery doesn't apply.
But we can add the the third equation and then everything is one.
BUt does that truely explain why Einstein is right.
Posted by STEVE at 2:08 AM 1 comments
RICHARD THOMAS- A MAN WITH EINSTEINS MISSION.
Garrett Lise had his theory then he wrote his book.That inspires me to write my book about a completed theory.
Because when I wrote before I didn't know what I was doing.
I didn't have any idea where it would end up.
Now I don't even know what I intended in the first place.
Because I have a much better theory that energy is greater than.
As a matter of fact it is the same theory only mass is greater than.
Because for energy to balance with mass mass has to be greater than energy simply because all of the mass will not ever be converted to energy.
Some must be lost in conversion.
So mass keeps getting more massive.
And that is just it I have completed my theory so now I don't want to talk about it.
But that is silly.
It is obvious that with each generation of universes mass must become more massive.
Because energy is lost each time.
And that doesn't make sense even to me.
But assume it is right it can be a guess that is better than some peoples calculations.
Energy is required for outer space that is from another dimension.
And maybe that is inner space and it is exactly that.
But energy is not required if it is evolution.
And to balance 2+2=4 the universes must become more massive as you approach the begining of time.
And if that isn't right and I haven't doubted until now.
The mass and the energy of the big crunch and the big bang must be identical.
And identical means the unviverse doesn't become more massive but energy is not lost.
And it is so eventually we would reach infinite energy.
And the alterntive is that we would reach infinite mass.
And that makes perfect sense mathematically.
Indeed it is a mathematical model of the unvierse.
And the fact that it begins with A Godel universe means everything.
That it is positivist.
It just happens that a Godel unviverse fits my facts it begins with a non contradiction.
That is maths that is 2+2=4.
And it ends in a big crunch that it is a contradiction.
That is maths taht is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
That is 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 FERMI/DIRAC= 1 BOSE EINSTEIN CONDENSATE.
And if this equation is true that the unviverse may have begin with a bose Einstein condenstate.
And it may have applications for physics.
because we may be able to make a fermi dirac condensate.
And it si juts the opposite we add two parts fermi dirac to one part Bose Einstein.
And a unviverse that is Godel cannot begin with a non contradiction.
And everything is saying that a contradictory universe can begin with a non contradiction.
So the universe prior to the big crunch would be a non contradictory universe like our own.
It is a circle where there are opposites.
And every circle is two opposites.
So thats the explaination.
And you haven't understood.
And I don't think another ten pages would help even a little bit.
Because the unviverse cannot be evolutionary because it becomes too massive.
It must be creationary science it must have started with a big Zap.
A big zap of energy from another dimension makes the two universes balance.
2+2=4.
Otherwise we would have to say that 2+2 doesn't equal four exactly that a little bit of energy is lost.
And a little may prove to be a lot.
So it might be a big difference to mathematics.
But we can assume 2+2 does equal four and the unvierses become more massive as time approaches zero.
And it must approach zero if it reaches infinity.
And then can be rounded off to zero.
I don't have any thng more to say for today.
And I do say it will be nice proving the theory right.
Because I have always begun the other way.
And now I know what Iam trying to prove.
But If my theory proves to be wrong then all my work is not worthless.
And that is like newton it is still a good thoery.
It fits the mathematics maybe better than any thoery every has.
It is Einsteins mission to prove everything is one.
And Iam Richard Thomas and Iam a man with Einsteins mission.
Only I can't prove it it be one.
I have to prove it to be 2+2=4.
If we have just one unviverse that the same applies to balance the equation we have to get energy from another dimension.
And it is easy to prove creation but it not easy with one universe to prove evolution.
Posted by STEVE at 12:33 AM 0 comments
Saturday, April 26, 2008
BLOG THE BOOK 12.
So we have finally decided to give the starwriter away.
And of course there are two starwriters so we shall service one and keep it and give the other away.
And it is a great gift for christmas.
But christmas can come early.
And everyone will rejoice.
Because they will say when Stephen gave Josh the starwriter it was like christmas.
Gods will was done on earth as it is in heaven.
I have no more to say because I can't talk about equations.
And of course I have plenty to say.
But not to those who love equations.
But even to them.
You can lvoe a thing to death and I have loved it to death.
It has reached it's final conclusion.
As one man said the things of God are clearly understood by the creation so they have no excuse.
And they have an answer of sorts to prove why God is wrong.
But they cannot resist the wisdom by which Stephen Speaks.
And that is why they want to crucify him.
And they have choosen the worst weapon of all his reputation.
But he is not alone all the believers have the reputation dragged through the mud.
And noone is immune to persecution.
But you can do something about it.
And that is not seek glory and fame.
And glory and fame is for those who do not believe.
For they will have their fill of what it means to be full of pride.
And maybe they will bow to Jesus and Ask him to be their king. further study willprove it right and it may that is what theories are all about.BLOG THE BOOK 1 AND 2
Todays diary,
I called ben Joans computer repair man and made an appointment
for the seventh of Feburary.
He won't be there that week so his technican will handle the job.
I also might get a manual on my Pioneer.
I can get it serviced but it is going to cost me $59 upfront.
Pussy has been eating mince that is good because we don't ever
know what to feed her,but she has been meowing too much.
Mum thinks she might be in pain.
But I don't think so she is OK.
Steve Patrick refunded the $100 I sent him by mistake.
Both guys are named Steve.
So it is going to take a few days for my paypal refund to clear.
Then I can pay Steve Cooper and he should get started on Sensible
girl on Thursday.
That is if he got his money I don't think he willl start until he
gets his hundred dollars.
Josh is still working on Branagan and Flanaggan.And I have told
him I will pay him in two weeks.
I had better be careful as I have to pay for the computer also in
two weeks.
But Joan sais her repair guy is reasonable.
But the question is what does Joan consider reasonable.$
Will it be cheaper than Drews $50.
Drew is a great guy but it looks like he will be replaced by
another guy.
The noone reads my blog I might as well write a book syndrome.
That is the name of this dairy.
I intend to reminse and talk about the past and the future.
How can I talk about the future.
The future of my song Back to the Future with the Chevy Ford
band.
I have asked them to play the songs warming up their instruments.
So people will always hear them first before they go on.
Rawhide is great for warming up instruments.
This machine is really hunky dory.It works 100% and only cost
$20.
The kids will like it much better than a typewriter.
My friend Ralphs kids I mean I might make a gift of it to Hanna
if she is a budding writer.
You just never know if someone is going to be a writer and you
always do.
The nonone ever reads my blog I will write a book syndrome.
That is what Iam talking about.
That is why Iam using a wordprocessor rather than a computer.
There is no accounting for taste.
And maybe there is an accounting for taste.
We has better watch out.!
I won $20 last night and actually I won $35 but I lost $15 back.
If I have sandwhiches for lunch I will be able to pay my RSL
fees.
So I can go to the club in the future.
I will have enough for busfare and my RSL fees.
Fixing the pioneer is a big expense I have to put $59 down.
And that is taken off the repair bill.
And I have to pay a courier to deliver the parcel.
I think I will because the girl said it was up to me.
And it is mum would not do it let alone dad.
But I can pay whatever it costs to get the Pioneer working again.
My theory of the big bang.
Four states of matter in one state and four forces one.
That means state and forces are one thing.
2 STATE+ 2 FORCE= 4 STATE/FORCE.
Now that is an equation really a theory for everything.
We should be able to prove that supercritical non newtonian fluid
has only two states.
And as a result only two forces there we have our equation for
the begining of the universe 2+2=4.
Maybe 2+2=4 is not such a bad equation for the begining.
But what if the maths was always non contradictory.
If it is never 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
Like my book sais.Only Einstein sais the math can be works out as
a non contradiction.
Is Einstein wrong and Stephen Jeffreys right.
That depends on what Stephen Jeffreys really believes.
Does he believe that the maths is a non contradiction and that
creaation began ex-nihilo.
Not out of a phase change from one state of matter to four.
That would produce the energy OK but what about the ID.The
intelligent design.
It is taken for granted.
But without it would there be order in a disorderly universe.
Can we build a bomb based on supercritical non newtonian fluid.?
Since nobel was an exposives manufacturer perhaps he would give
me his prize if I could make an explosive producing a plasma from
supercritical non newtonian fluid.
Then all four forces and four states would be one.
But am I right is finding correspondance between state and force.
No one is sure they ask thier local scientist.
Blacksmith friend.
Blacksmith friend Iam not sure you will ever solve time with my
Godel time machine.
But Godel has a universe which is opposite to our own in which
their are closed time loops.
Maybe it is opposite in being a non contradiction at the
begining.
If that is true then the maths works out in A godel universe for
the big bang.
A unified field theory is a possibility and the opposite is a
black hole in a Godel universe.
The reverse of this maths should give us the big bang in our
universe.
This is enough to keep mathematicians busy for centuries.
Or at least for five minitues.
It should keep them quiet for the scientist babysitters who are
minding the mathematicians making sure they are empirical.
But the baby sitters haven't done a very good job.
My thoery of everything is a universal program.
One that is a superomega 2+2=4 is a superomega when it is used to
get one equation for everything in a theory of maths.
But physics and maths are very similar if you can get one
equation for phsyics you can also get one for maths.
But omega means you can't or does superomega mean you can.
It gets confusing.
Wolframs celular automaton means you don't use maths to get the
rules for everything.
So in a sense it means Omega is right.
You have to go beyond maths to make it an experimental science.
Really these two things are the same.
Dad is really mentally unbalanced he listens to the radio and Tv
all day long.
And whenever I try to talk he tells me to shut up and listen to
the radio.
It has just gotten worse and worse over the years.
It shows what happens when you let habits get to you...
A habit is a force for evil.
Good habits are a force for good.
Like learning to fix watches.It is just too expensive.
And that is the whole trouble there are so many things to buy.
It would be good if everything were all on one kit.
Easy to use.
But it isn't easy and it might not be too hard.
Time will tell the future is what we make it.
If I could fix watches I could have a big house with a Big plasma
TV and a wife to go with it.
You can't have a wife unless you can support her.
That is what Will Robinson said about Sleeping beauty.
I paid Steve Cooper $100 today for Simply Sensible.
He said he would talk to Juli about doing the song.
They don't have any answers because they are not asking any
questions.
Like what would an ex-nihilo theory look like.
How would it differ from the big bang theory.
What if we add billions of years to exnihilo what do we get.
Rubbish that is what everyone might say.
But I don't think so.
Ex-nihilo is a non contradictory begining for the universe the
four states of matter are always four and the forces never become
one.
So the contradiction equation 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE=
1 APPLE/ORANGE is not true.
This arguement against the big bang is so strong mathematically.
That the only recource of the blaphemer is ad hominum arguements
against me.
They find scientific arguements ineffective.
This is because Einstein wanted a non contradictory theory of
everything.
And what we have is a contradictory theory of everything where
opposite particles X and Y are in the same space and the same
time in the same state.
The non contradictory thoery of everything would be creation in
the Godel universe where the maths that is the reverse of our
system could make sense.
This is just a begining for a creation ex-nihilo theory of
everything.
Everything including the expansion of the universe needs to be
taken into account.
Iam getting my computer fixed next pay as well as paying part
payment on two songs.
So money is going to be tight.
I wonder when I will ever have any money to just have a good
time.
Steve Cooper has booked Juli for next Friday.
He has recorded parts of the song Simply Sensible.
Steve Coopers son is in Jumped and Alien Versus Predator 2.
And I asked Steve Cooper if the girl from Dr Phil.
Could record in his Houston Studios and have pizza with the band.
Chevy Ford band.
The future is not ours to see.
But I figure if I have mercy on someone else that is trying to
make it it will water me as well.
One favour deserves another.
And it is by doing people favours who one day will be successful.
That one succeeds yourself.
Look at Kevin Rudd I tried to help him get elected.
He is now helping the homeless my main thing.
But he still refuses to put intelligent design in Australian
schools.
Maybe the unions won't let him.
It really matters to me as much as homelessness.
But how much does it matter to Kevin Rudd that creation is taught
in schools.
One would think it would matter a little to any christian.
Except an evolutionist and then he would want reasons to believe
curriculum taught in schools.
Either way it is the thought that counts remembering God when it
comes to what we teach our kids.
Next pay my major challenge is to give Stephanie Nickel a deposit
of $200 or more for the last stage of our script IN THE SHADOW OF
9/11.
It is a good script so far and Iam hoping Steph can finish it
without ruining the first 60 pages.
It has gone the way that I wanted it to go and it is important to
be true to yourself.
I would like a pair of crocs shoes.
And maybe they will have to wait if I want to pay Stephanie.
Unless I pay half the bill for Broadband this pay and the other
half next pay.
Supercritical non newtonian fluid does that mean 2 STATES+ 2
FORCES= 4 STATE/FORCE.
I think it really does although Iam not certain going from that
to plasma unifes the four states and four forces.
It is the subject of experiment.
And experiment can answer all questions.
Eddington said don't worry if the observations don't mathc your
theory the observations are probably wrong.
This is the opposite to the empirical approach to science.
Maybe you need a philosophy that can be tested by observations.
Maybe if science is not grounded in philosophy it can't work.
Was that what Eddington was trying to say.
For example there were not observations of an expanding universe
in Einsteins time so he modified his theory with the cosmological
constant which he later called his greatest blunder.
The future is ours to see.
And of course it was not Einsteins to see the future.And anyone
who makes up a thoery doesn't know whether it will be right.
But they should believe in it.
And to believe in it it has to add up.
It has to be as sensible as 2+2=4.
Then you can be certain that it is right.
And if it is really really simple then it cannot be wrong.
Yet even simple things can be wrong.
Simple observations of the way things work can be in error.And
observations are never wrong.
So If I base a theory on an observation that entropy reverses
when ice freezes.
then I cannot be wrong when I say entropy reverses for the big
bang.
But it doesn't.
And it has to to explain the order in the universe.My ramblings
juts off the top of my head.
Are as good as mud.
And they might be as clear as mud.
But totally interesting anyway.
And there is nothing unclear about my ramblings.
There is no future for rambling.
And there is a great future for blogs of all kinds.And maybe the
blog will never replace the book.
And it is Blog the book.
That is what this book is one big blog.
And it is exciting to have my starwriter on my desk.
Because writing is a slow process.
And if I leave it in the lounge room I will have a book in no
time.
One that isn't very good.And one that is just fine.
So what kind of a book will it be now.
A book about everything.
About totally anything I find interesting.
And the starwriter makes a great gift for me.
Because I can see what Iam writing.
And it is better than a computer.
It is great for writing my blog.
And what do I want to winge about.
If you are writing a blog you must want to winge about something.
And I do I want to winge about why it is so.
Because there is nothing worse than winging.
And asking why the problem exists in the first place.
is the first step towartds solving it.
So why do indentical particles X and Y exist in the SAME PLACE at
the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME.
I would say that they don't.
If I didn't believe the big bang.
And the big bang means 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1
APPLE/ORANGE is TRUE.
And if it is true identical particles can occupy the SAME SPACE.
Why is it so.?
And that is our problem why does this equation mean something
which cannot be true.
The answer is it does mean two opposites can be one.
But it also means identical particles can be made one.
And maybe both are true.
But to add identical particles you have to split them in 1/3s.
And maybe you only have to take a third of a particle
matematically.
And this is really interesting.A third of a particle
mathematically is a third of a particle.
It will behave just as if you had split the particle three ways.
So there is nothing to stop us putting three identical particles
togther on paper.
And that is a solution to fusion.
If we could do it in reality and not just on paper.
Then we could take three hydrogens and get one hydrogen.
Hydrogen three.
And that isn't it it is a new particle of hydrogen based on three
divided particles.
And maybe it is the answer.
But will never know if we don't ask the question why is it so.?
Why would three particles becoming one.
Generate power.
It is a answer to a prayer.
Because it might be an answer to a hope.
That one can be three.
Because splitting one into three is what three thirds are all
about.
But three into one is exactly the same process.
And it really is not.
It is putting humpty back togther again.
And if a third of a particle can exist at all.
Then it can be joined to another two thirds of a particle.
So we take the particle apart and then we put it back togther
again.
And that is humpty dumpty.
And it is a sound theory.
But putting particles togther in the same place at the same time
when they are identical.
Is plausible.
If we are dealing with forces on a par with the big bang.
Then paricles may disintegrate and reunite all the time.
What is my purpose noting les than nuclear oblivian.And of course
I ahve higher hopes than that for a world on the brink of war.
And it is insane to have high hopes.Ad it might not be insane to
believe that eventually war will be over.
And that nuclear power will replace ordinary power.
And that is exactly what happened.
So it could happen again.
After using the power that is given in anger.
It may never be used again not in anger but in peace.
And everything has it downside.It is the slipppery slope.
And sometimes allowing something does not mean the slippery
slope.
Sometimes things get better and not worse.
And that is the opposite to Murphys law.
And we cannot live our lives by Murphys law or we would always be
afraid.
That is what the law on non contradiction causes in me.
Fear of what it means to have exceptions.
But there have always been exceptions.
and there always will be one exception that is the big bang.
It can never be worked out as Einstein said that it could be with
on contraiction mathematics.
It takes a new kind of math QUANTUM STRANGENESS.
To work out the big bang.
If time can travel backwards and entropy be reversed then the big
bang can make sense.
If four states of matter being one means four forces are also
one.
The energy can be released on a grand scale.
Four particles A B X Y can be four states of identical particles.
and they can be one STATE and the four particles can be in the
SAME POSITION at the SAME TIME.
And this is the key to unlimited energy.
And you don't have to believe me ADOPT A PHYSIST.
That is what Iam doing.
And he will tell me to go back to the drawing board.
But in trying to prove me wrong he will prove me right.
And I will have plenty to talk about.
Because adopting a physics professor for collaboration was the
best move ever.
There is no answer to how much I have to want to be free.
Because if I believe writing is a curse.
Then I have to want to be free.
And everyone believes writing is no curse.
But what about a blessing I have yet to see any blessing from my
writing.
And it is obvious that it is no blessing.
Because it is plain that the fruit is bad.
And yet I continue to make a blog.
Because I hope in vain for something to happen.
That is positive.
And everything seems to be negative.
And all things come to those who wait.
One day I will be happy that I kept writing.
Because I could be afraid of all the possibilities.
Like a poisoned pie.
You can't believe God would make a poisoned pie.
And I do not believe that.
And the truth is I do believe God is the author of a poisoned
pie.
Because everything I believe affects me.And believing God is the
author of a pie that is poisoned.
Really makes it hard for God to reach me.
And it isn't the case.That it is hard for God to reach me.
And it really is true that He is trying hard.
To get me to believe the pie is not poison.
Because if anyone can eat the pie and not be hurt.
Then it is not poison.
But of course I explain the way of 666.
And I explain how to believe otherwise.
And of course I make it very difficult to believe otherwise.
But that is because it is difficult to prove 666 wrong.
With mathematics.
Because it is easy to prove it wrong with logic.
And that is what I will do right now.
I will prove 666 wrong with logic.
It is logical to do the opposite of what Jesus sais.
If Jesus sais 12+12=24 is right then 21+21=42 must be right.
And that is the logic of the blaphemers.
They simply have to choose 42 as there answer rather than six
fours.
If Jesus had said 42 was the answer they would choose 24.
And it is obvious that Jesus did not say anything.And of course
it is all in my mind.And I may have darkenes instead of light.
That is the whole question have I blasphemed the Holy Spirit by
talking about why Einstein is wrong.
And I might have done that if Einstein was God.
And of course he is not.
So I can prove him wrong without proving God wrong.
And maybe I can't prove Einstein wrong without proving God wrong.
Then If Iam really proving God wrong in my book Einstein Proved
Wrong.
Then it is a poisoned pie.
But if the purpose is to prove God right.
Then the pie is not poisoned.
And I don't know if my purpose is to prove God right or the law
of non contradiction wrong.
And that is just it if it is my purpose to prove non
contradiction wrong.
Then Iam proving all truth wrong.
And If I argue the big bang contradicts the law of non
contradiction.
Then I doing God a big favour.
And I might think so.But God doesn't need any favours.
And He would love one.
He would love it if I decided that ex-nihilo creation means
matter was never in the same state at the same time in the same
place.
That opposite particles cannot be in the same state and place at
the same time.
And this would really rot your socks if you were with reasons to
believe.
Because the big bang is mathematically impossible.
Unless we allow the creation equation.
And it is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
And it is a contradiction according to my enemies.
But if they are right it proves the big bang wrong.
Because that is a good purpose for a creation equation.
But if the big bang is right.
Then a whole new branch of contradictory math must be created to
allow identical particles to exist in the same state at the same
time in teh same place.
And that would not prove the big bang right.
It would mean it is not part of the set of truth.
IT would mean it is a lie.
And that is close to the truth.
Because the thoery that everything was once one.
Cannot be true if the law of non contradiction always holds.
The reason why the pie may be poison.
Is many good christians believe both the law of non contradiction
and the big bang.
And if one is not true then the other will still be true.
And sadly they will choose to believe non contradiction does not
always apply.
That makes my computer program poison.
Because it attempts to unify everything with my equation and
2+2=4.
And maybe 2+2=4 is the real saver.
Becasue the four forces can be four.
And they can if they are two forces plus two forces.
And that is what Iam explaining with non contradiction.
Because if forces are two they are not contradictory.
They are only contradictory when they are one.
Everything cannot be one they way God is one.
And if the equation attempts to make creation the same as the
creator.
Then it is a pot of poison.
But it is not clear in my book that the creation equation is a
means of proving creation cannot be a big bang.
If the big bang is 2+2=4 then it can still have occured.
Only in this way can the law of non contradiction be right.
But what if 2+2=4 is not adequate.
WHat if you can't explain the equations by adding them 2+2=4.
Because if the unviverse was once 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4
FORCE/STATE.
Then all equations should add up 2+2=4.
And Einsetins equatin doesn't.
Even though I have tried hard to prove why it can be 2+2=4.
Scientists would say it is fundamentally not a 2+2=4 equation.
And that is just it if I can come up with a theory of everything
that is 2+2=4.
The Hawking is a cosmic con artist.
And it does not follow from the conclusion.
And it really does follow.
Hawking believes you can prove anything with math.
And it will still be right.
But that is seperating the real world from the math.
And I can prove everything with the math.
I can prove Einsteins unified field theory.
At least in my delusions of grandeur I can prove it.
But I have never looked at the math of Godel.
Yet I claim his theory begins with a non contradictory big bang.
And leads to a contradictory black hole.
And this as good as what Hawking does.
And of course he checks the math first.
BUt I have come with the idea so Hawking can check the math.
If the the big bang is non contradictory in another universe.
That means it is contradictory in ours.
And maybe that is a recipie for disaster.
But time will not go backward in our universe.
And it will at the begining.
That is a new theory that Godel is right for the begining of our
unviverse.
And it sounds good and it was right off the top of my head.
Because it is good enough to loose my head.
Because the math can be understood to prove the big bang wrong.
Because the above should be true if the big bang is a
contradiction.
But if the opposite of a black hole in a Godel universe is non
contradiction maths.
Then that math should prove the big bang right.
But if it does not then it may prove exnihilo.
But exnihilo has never been combined with an old universe.
And if it were combined it would prove science right.
And religion right.
It would prove both wrong.And of course we don't know what it
woud prove.
But maybe we would be better off with a big bang.
Than ex-nihilo that argues evolution is right.
It is hard to argue evolution is wrong if the earth is old.
And that isn't true.
And it might not be the premise that everything exists without
cause.
Is a premise that is inadeqaute.
It is a God of inadequacy.
When evolution is put togther with ID.
Both are an adequate cause.
And they may be if ex-nihilo creation were combined with an old
earth.
But that would an an inadequate explaination of the origin of the
earth.
And only if everything had to be created all at once.
Maybe seven days means it took time for creation to take place.
And that is happened according to the laws of physics chemistry
and biology.
With a helping hand from ID.
Id is an excellent helping hand for evolution.
Without ID evolution cannot explain anything.
But with ID evolution can explain everything.
And that could be a suspect pie.
Because we are saying God lied about the creation of the
universe.
And of course we are not saying that we are saying Lord help us
to explain how you created everything.
Without saying you did it by chance.
And that is the pie of ill repute.
My universal program which gives rise to space and time.
Maybe it is terrific.
To be able to prove order within randomness.
or maybe it is just a way of arguing there is no God.
There has to be order within randomness so mankind will have a
choce whether to have faith or not.
Philosophy and creation science can never approach God.
And they cannot reach God without faith.
That is the four spiritual laws.
And If I were lost I would love them.
But because Iam found I don't regard them highly.
And it is the opposite if I were lost I would not regard the four
spiritual laws highly.
They are too simple an explaination for life the universe and
everything.
And Jesus explaination is 3*4.
Three laws about four spiritual laws.
And they are MAKE NO GRAVEN IMAGE.Because God can be random.
He can be an image that is random.
And God is never happy with graven images.
Graven images can be mathematical equations for God.
And that is exactly it making God one with everything is a graven
image.
And God is one with everything.
And only for the Buddhists.
Every single thing on earth is distinct and in kinds.
And there are kinds of all phenomonon.
And that includes things like states and forces.
They are never one but always kinds.
That means everything has never be one.
Everything has always been at least four states and four kinds of
forces.
That is the four laws for cosmology.
The fact that there are four laws for the universe.
Means there are four laws for everything.
And that might be 12 because there are three laws.
Of four.
And that is the total of all knowledge.
To understand what it means that three times four is equal to 12.
And maybe it just like 42.
Just an answer you give when you don't know.
But God does know.
So the answer he gives is not a contradiction.
And three fours is not contradictory any more than two sixs.
2+2=4 is equal to 12+12=24.
And that is the basis of the early univese.
It is simply not what they say it is.
And there equations are no better than 42.
Because that is actually the answer they are giving.
But am I trusting someone I love.
I believe so.
Someone I love would not poison me.
And If Iam poisoned by someone I love.
Then it my fault for trusting a little bit too much.
You can find the answers in my next book.
And I hope so that the starwriter will get many years of use.
Because it is an excellent tool for writing the truth.
And if I told lies I would say it is perfect.
But it is just a machine that makes it easy to write.
And you just would never get around to writing as much as you
will write on this machine.
The equation for acceleration is intitial speed- final
speed/time.
And it is 2.
Because then you can add Speed= Distance/time.
If you make that two as well.
And then you have an equation for the speed of deceleration.
And exactly what is the speed of the deceleration of light in the
mirror chamber.
If is faster than C.
And it may faster than any speed.
Because light declerates very fast.
The speed of decleration is not as fast as the speed of the
acceleration of light.
And it may be very fast but not quite as fast as that.
Light takes 0 time to acclerate.
And that cannot be true since it proves absolute time.
So it must take a little time to accelerate.
And we can measure extremely small times.
And maybe we can't measure how small the time is for light to
accelerate.
But we can measure the decleration of light.And estimate how fast
it accelerates.
But all of this doesn't make sense because I have added two
equations 2+2=4.
And acceleration and speed are two different things.
But if they are the same.
Then what is speed.?
It is something similar to accleration but not quite the same
thing.
What will happen if we add 1/3 ACCELERATION+ 1/3 SPEED+ 1/3
SPEED= 1 ACCELERATION SPEED.
And that will make everything right.
Making two things one.
And totally everything is wrong when speed and acceleration are
the same thing.
Because Einsetins theory not longer applies to speed and
acceleration togther.
We have a new theory that is what we will say.
Because we will say the speed of decleration is greater than C.
And then E=MCsquared not longer applies to gravity waves.Because
the speed of accleration of gravity waves is greater than the
speed of light.And maybe this makes no sense maybe it still means
gravity has to travel at C.
Then Einstien isn't wrong.
But maybe Einstein needs a better theory.
So he has one.
If Iam Einstein then I have a better theory the speed of
acceleration of light is always going to be greater than the
speed of light.
So acceleration is greater than speed.
And that is a terrific law.
Only accleration can never be expressed as speed.
And of course light travels a distance the size of the universe
when it reflected to infinity.
So time is expressed in light years.
And this is divided by the speed of light.
To get acceleration.
And a similar rule will give us decleration.
But when we add the equations 2+2=4.
We get speed of decleration.
And that means information travels at a speed when it transmitted
on declerating light.
And the speed is greater than C.
And if they would only listen they would have a new operating
system for windows.
Where information travelled at a maximum speed of infinity.
And speed means Boyles law is obsolete.
But the law of too much information means that will never build
the new operating system.
And that is a shame so information revolution means information
overload.
They simply can't keep advancing the speed of information.
Because of C.
Unless they can make speed and decleration of light one.
They can never beat Boyles law.
And you are reading it and you think you understand why Iam
wrong.So email me at aircloud@bigpond.net.au
And tell me why information can never travel faster than light.
It may be that you are right.
That information cannot be transmitted on declerating light
beams.
Or accelerating.
If that is so information must always be limited to C.
So boyles law must always apply.
If you have enjoyed adding newtons laws for speed and
acceleration.
Then you will love adding Einsteins equations for speed and
accleration.
Does Einstein approach an explaination of information sent at
faster than the speed of light.?
And his equations for speed and acceleration added 2+2=4.
Or in 1/3s.
Will give an answer to the problem of time.
Does information travel faster than light without going back in
time.?
At the quantum level it does go back in time.
But information is more than quantum.
It is classical and maybe in classical theory information cannot
go faster than light.
We will succeed where others have failed.
This is always the way to fail because others have failed to
prove Einstein wrong for a reason.
And the reason is information cannot travel faster than light.
But let us suspend disbelief for a moment what If information can
travel faster than light.
The the speed of the deceleration of information is faster than
light.
How do I prove Jeffreys wrong.
By measurement it is not an experiment unless you do your own
measurement.
You have to measure the speed of decleration in the mirror
chamber with 2+2=4.
And you find the answer is a bit like adding 2 FORCE+ 2 STATE= 4
FORCE/STATE.
Maybe the equations are interchangeable.
And of course they are goobledegook.
But the idea of 2+2=4 is the most basic of ideas it is not
goobledegook.
It means two ideas can be combined without contradiction.
But we could add 1/3 SPEED C+ 1/3 DECELEATION C+ 1/3 DECELERATION
C= 1 SPEED/DECLERATION.
No one can measure the decleration of light in the mirros
chamber.
And anyone can it takes a bright mind to do so and some very
powerful computers.
And it only takes a five year old with matlab....
So maybe the speed of decleration of light has not been measured
because scientists have not bothered to measure it.
I keep saying hey measure it.
But they say no they won't.
It is a bit like Bruce Almighty they have free will...
So if they ever choose to believe my book they might measure the
speed of the decleration of light.
And see if they can measure information travelling faster than
light.
In a round about way I have described why EInstein would be wrong
if he was wrong but have only proved him right.
The distance travelled by light when it is reflected ot infinity
approaches zero brilliance at infinity.
But never reaches it.
If light were to reach zero.
The explansion of the universe would be at the speed of light.
This proves Einsetin is right.
Because the expansion of the universe can never exceed the speed
of light.
However the universe can be accelerating faster than C.
And what affect would this have on the zero value for the
distance light travels.?
Superheated supercritical non newtonian fluid.
And it is another state.
And it really might be another state to be boiling.
But it is even more of a new state.
But it is not quite plasma.
If it were possible to change a supercritical non newtonian fluid
to plasma.
It would be four states in one.
And it would in theory.
But perhaps supercritical non newtonian fluid cannot exist as a
plasma.
But if we can imagine that it can.
Then we have four forces unified.
And that is the thoery that unifiying the four forces is simply a
matter of unifying the four states.
And if they are totally indendant then you have to unify the four
forces some other way.
And they don't have to be unified.And they do for Einstein to be
right.
That is why we should try to unify them by unifying the four
states.
Four forces can be two forces when matter is two states.
If this is true it simplifys the idea.
There is a direct relationship between forces and the states of
matter.
Even if there is no direct relationship four forces must be one
in the big bang.
And they must be two.
That is 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4 FORCE/STATES.
And it is probably true that making four one.
Is possible but not in the universe.
Creation exnihilo is the alternative of 2+2=4.
and that is possible that it really could be the big bang.
But if the big bang were not one force and were two.
It would be different.
And the ultimate particle for 2+2=4 is the photon not the gluon.
Since photons can be in the same state and place at the same
time.
So thye ultimate particle we are looking for is not solid light.
It is light in a state between states.
And if atoms are made up of solid photons.
Then that is solid light.
And maybe everything begins with photons.
And that is a wild guess.
But like one of spocks guesses it is better than some peoples
calculations.
And we can test it in the accelerator.
And we most certainly can try to find out if atoms are ultimately
made up of photons.
I like it because it is my thoery.
That is what a six year old would say.
I have to say I like it because it fits the data.
It fits the data from Genesis.
Maybe photons are the binding force of the atoms.
And that should be easy to test.
But sometimes like with strings the ultimate particle cannot be
detected with instruments.
But a photon rather than a string would be a totally different
theory.
Matter must be photon like in the big bang.
And that is totally true.
Matter must behave like photons in a stateless way.A maybe a
photon could vibrate at a frequency.
There I have unified string theory and photon theory for the
first time.
If we could imagine a string of light.
Maybe we would be cooking with plutonium.
And I just don't have the answers.
I could say that or I could speculate.
You might as well have two bob each way.
And that is what a lot of people do.
But I choose a rough horse and put the house on.
That is what Hawking sais to do.
And that is the way he plays science.
He bets on improbability.
But it is a good bet the universe is probably stanger than we
imagine it to be.
E=Mcsquared= 2 H+ 2 H + E= 4 H+E
And H is mass the mass of two hyrdgogen atoms.
And mass is equal to atomic weight for hydrogen.
And dont quote me.
Because it is true Iam certain.
E=mc squared= 2 M+ 2M+ E= 4 M+E.
And this is the test of Einsteins equation can you make
E=MCsquared equal to 2+2=4.
If both equations are equal then fission is equal to fusion.
That means the matter that is lost in fission is equal to energy
produced.
And the amount of matter gained in fusion is equal to the energy.
If they can be equal then Einsetin is right.
Matter can be equal to energy and not just mass.
The equations do not equal.
Is what you might say.
You might say E=MCsquared can never be expressed as 2+2=4 because
C cannot be 2.
And if fission can never equal fusion for energy produced and
more is produced by fusion.
The Einstein is wrong about equivalence.
There are two transformations of matter to energy and they are
both not equal to each other.
And that is just balderdash.
And maybe it really isn't because maybe energy and mass are not
equal to energy and mass.
And that is rubbish.
But the possibility that a new energy can be derived from four
states of matter being one.
And foru forces being one.
May mean the fusion and fission are two different things.
And of course they are a hydrogen bomb is not a putonium bomb.
And they are both plutonium bombs.
But it depends on how you phrase a question to the answer that
you get.
And I will bet they will prove Einstein right.
That 2+2=4 can be E=MCsquared.
And that fisson and fusion can be one.
That is it I really don't have anything else to talk about.
And I have decleration.
And I have explained that fully.
And decleration is newtons equation.
For acceleration reversed.
And it might not even be the same equation.
But if we add Newtons equation for decleration to Newtons
equation for speed.
We get the speed of decleration.
And it is equal to Pi squared multiplied 186,000 m/s squared.
And there is no reason that instantaenous doesn't take a little
time.
Pi squared multiplied by 186,000 squared is the fastest speed we
can imagine.
And it maybe the limit for deceleration.
Nothing can decelerate faster than light.
And light can.
Light can declerate faster than light.
So what is the point.
We can transmit information on declerating light.
And maybe we cannot use declerating light for information.
But if we can the speed of the information will be faster than C.
And we be travelling between two mirrors an infinite distance.
The distance is virtual.
And it is more than that it is a physical distance measured by
the loss of energy of light.
And maybe it is a simulator for the real world where light
travels a finite distance.
But you can't round off infinity.
And you really can make finity rational.
Because infinity is always rational.And it never is.
That is the whole point.
If an infinite distance is a rational distance time is absolute.
And if time is absolute anything can travel faster than light.
And only information can.
And of course I have talked about all this before.
So I must be finished.
And there always comes a point where the work is finished.
And maybe I want to finish with four forces thatare one and four
states that are one.
That is a good place to finish.
Because you have you choice of believing the big bang or
exnihilo.
And it on the basis of the test for truth.
And if the test for truth is wrong then the big bang is right.
But if the test for truth is not wrong that it happened
differenty to what they say.
We can say that it must be non contradictory to be a sound
theory.
And that is all we can say since ex-nihilo is not really a
theory.
If it were a theory we could compare it to the big bang and find
one right and the other wrong.
But maybe they are both right and the big bang mathematics must
be non contradictory.
Then 2+2=4 must be right for forces and states.
Because that is non contradictory.
But 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE is
something the scientists do not agree about.
If it is the equation for the big bang.
Then it fails the truth test.
And if it is the equation for ex-nihilo then it doesn't fail the
truth test because something out of nothing is a contradiction.
In terms.
And that is what the contradiction is all about it is
acontradcition of terms.
Terms like space time and state and place.
Particles can exist in the same place even if they are identical.
And they cannot exist in the same time and state.
And I have said this before but it has become the total sum of
all knowledge.
And it might be just that I might know myself that I will choose
something else if God sais 2+2=4.
SO if the truth proves 2+2=4.
I would choose to believe the other equation.
But the truth sais the other equation is right and not 2+2=4.
And maybe that is a lie.
Because arguing against 2+2=4 isn't logical.
And that is the whole point of my books.
You can have a 2+2=4 theory of everything.
One that does add up.
But you cannot have a contradictory theory of everything.
And of course you can.
People disagree about whether the law of non contradiction is
true.
And they will always disagree.
But I should agree that the evidence is in favour of the law.
And I have not looked at the evidence.
And that is what I must do.
Before deciding the big bang is false.
I must be sure the law always holds in every circumstance.
That there are no exceptions.
And there ar eno laws like that.
Even gravity can have an exception.
SO the big bang is an exception to a law that holds true
otherwise.
That is if this equation is right 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3
ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
The non contradictory equation is 2 APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4
APPLE/ORANGE.
This could work for the big bang or ex-nihilo.
The maths is simple non contradiction maths.
So the theory has to agree with this law to be valid.
And no one will agree with that.
The hope that I have is that everyone will enjoy what I have
done.And that is because I have saved the starwriter one more
time.
So I can finish what I have started.
And make a dos file.
Because this starwriter can make a dos disc that can save dos
files.
And then I can open them.
And maybe I can open them with XP.
Then I can put them on a blog.
And everyone will say what a great blog.
And nobody ever sais that.
A blog is a blog that is my philosophy.
And it is not very good because there are blogs and there are
blogs.
And it is a great blog.
That is my conclusion and now I will make the dos file.
Posted by STEVE at 5:42 AM 0 comments
Monday, March 31, 2008
TWO FOR THE MONEY AND THREE FOR THE SHOW
Dear Roddy,
A blackboard is the modern version of a cave wall.
And I have a way to make a blackboard for the creation science museum.
The exhibit should be called teaching the controversy.
One black board should be 1/3 FERMI DIRAC EQUATION+ 1/3 BOSE EINSTEIN EQUATION+ 1/3 BOSE EINSTEIN EQUATION= 1 BOSE EINSTEIN/FERMI/DIRAC EQUATION.
1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
And you can fill a blackboard with 100's of equations from various physical theories added in 1/3s.
1/3 100+ 1/3 100+ 1/3 100 equations= 1 100 /100= 1 EQUATION.
You can get one equation from 100.
Or even use thousands or millions of equations and reduce them to one.
X and Y are in the SAME PLACE at the SAME TIME in the SAME STATE with this equation contrary to the law of non contradiction.
EX-NIHILO is the other blackboard.
And we add equations 2APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4 APPLE/ORANGE this is according to the rules of non contradiction.
And the equations do not balance just like the equation for the unvierse it's energy doesn't balance for ex-nihilo energy must be gotten from outside the universe to balance the equation..
We can add 2000+2000=4000 4000/1000= 2+2-4.
To reduce 2000 equations to one equation of 2+2=4.
We could have a third blackboard in the middle where we try to put the two blackboards togther.
This is simple easy to do and is all about the cave man instinct to draw on a cave wall.
These simple equations can become very complex and give us the answers that we need.
I assume being a creationist that they will prove the law of non contradiction as the basis for all truth and creation ex-nihilo rather than proving Einstein right.
Reread the above until you get it it is not obvious at first if you ar enot used to using simple math to solve physics problems.
Steve A Jeffrey
----- Original Message -----
Posted by STEVE at 8:33 PM 1 comments
THE CAVE PAINTING
This is like the past being resurrected.
Iam totally in the past.
And Iam at the same time in the present and it a little
uncomfortable.
Because it brings back many memories.
And it should bring back everything.
That is not good.
But it does have to be that way.
Even though I want to get rid of the past.
I can learn by my mistakes.
And hold on to what is good.
Everything I have written on this starwriter has been good.
And I began with writing with speaking.
And that was a terrific begining.
I proved I could write until I got distracted by something else.
And that is why I use the starwriter Iam not distracted.
I can take a memo about the days activities.
If I want to.
And it should always be that way.
I shouldn't have to write about every day.
And find something interesting in a boring day.
But I can do that and that what a writer does writes about his
day.
And of course a writer has something to write about.
And I have My Science Thesis.
And it will never be finished.
And maybe that should be the case that it not finished until the
fat lady sings.
I can always write another blog.
And maybe I won't bother.
But If Iam making progress why stop.
Maybe one day someone will read everything I have written and
continue my work.
And that would be pointless.
And there is always a point.
A point that they falied me because I was too clever and maybe I
wanted to get out of work.
And that is always the reason you are failed.
And sometims it is because you are too stupid.
But not in this case.
They failed me for having faith.
Faith in my work which they wanted to show was not good.
And that is obvious now.
That everybody hates my work.
That they never give credit where credit is due.
They are simply monsters that you would fear if you were young.
And people do fear them.
But I just give them as good as they get.
Because they never understand why I am not hurt.
Because they are certain their words hurt.
And people like that are unusual.At least they were.
But they seem to love the Hawking forum.
So there is something very bad about it.
Maybe it is Hawking himself he is not a christian.
And yet he pretends to believe.
For science sake.
And for religions sake he pretends not to believe.
So he really is a pretender.
And so the forum is a place where people pretend to be someone
else.
And Iam better off without it.
That is what I would say if I allowed it to go back to the way it
was.
They would find someone else to pick on.And maybe that is what I
need to see someone else in my shoes.
And to no longer allow these people to mess with me.
Because they are messing with my head.
And they really are pretending to be messing with my head.
Because they don't understand pschatry is meant to heal.
Whatever Tom Cruise might say they have healed me.
And they have helped when I needed help.
So I should not hate them.
They can't put the devil down as the cause it has be rational.
Like all science we can't put the devil down as the cause of
Einstein.
When he may be one of the factors.
Einsetin could never hold down a job and he could so chances are
he wasn't insane.
But that doesn't mean he got all his ideas from God.
His God was spinozas and that is just an evil spirit.
So you have got to watch out what your God is.
If it is Einstein it is spinozas God and it is a God of
contradiction.
And contradiction always is a sign of something missing.
There is something missing from Einsteins theory.
And he knew and was looking for it.
And Iam humble enough to say I have not found it.
But that Einstein has given me the clue.
What if my answer is just an misunderstanding.
Then it is my misunderstanding.
And it is a good one.
Because to misunderstand Einstein is to understand him.
I could write a hundred blogs and I could combine them all into
one.
And it would all be on one disc.
That is the beauty of this machine.
It is the ultimate in tools for writing.
There is nothing like this machine to make a blog.And a blog can
become a book.
But it is likely to remain a blog.
And there is no reason I can't learn to use the software.ANd if I
could I would but I can't so I won't.
It is way too expensive to hire someone to upload the book.
But maybe if I had the photos I could easily upload a new book.
So I will probably never put the book on LULU.
Because it just can work to put it on LULU.
Then it can be the longest book ever.
And it can be called MY RESEARCH.
1999-2008.
And that is a good title.
But no title is necessary for a blog.
It can just be BLOG CONTINUED.ANd BLOG A B C D E F G.
ANd it can be ALPHA NUMERICAL it can be blog A 1 A 2 A 3.
And that is perfect.
Because Iam always in search of the perfect title.
So Thomas's Blog A 1.
That is what I will call this Blog Richard Thomas Blog A1.
And if you have heard of an Einstein named Richard Thomas then I
have managed to shake my past.
And everyone should have the right to make a new start.
Wit a new name somewhere else that no one has ever heard of them.
And no one wants that.
And it is a great blessing to no longer fear what my name has
meant.
Because it has meant things to me that were not pleasant.
It has meant a fight to be accepted.
And a fight to not be rejected.
And all of that is in the past.
Because Iam Richard Thomas and Iam Johnboy the writer.
And I will always be a famous writer.
But no one will ever know who Iam.
And that is the way I like it.And that is the way everybody likes
it.When they know what fame is like.
It is awful.
To be well known.
And it really hard on those you love.
That is why I shall remain annonymous.
Because people want to hurt me with their words.
They know their words hurt.
And they know that Iam am reacting to their words.
Because they are looking for a reaction that means they have hurt
me.
And how crazy is that even a lunatic would not expect people to
be hurt by what they said.
And that is why Iam sane and they are not.
Because I don't set out to hurt people with my words I set out
tohelp them.
And If I fail I may hurt them badly.
And I know that.
And I seldom care.
But that is not the same as setting out to destroy others.
And it careless and being careless with words can hurt people a
lot.
No one is perfect in speech.
And Iam not.
My gifts are imperfect.
But If I continue to use them in faith Iam using what I have been
given to do good for all.
And the good of all means doing everything I can to help people.
But not to th extent that I give away my gift.
Because I need my tool to use my gift.
And a writer does not give away his tool.
Unless he is finished.
And that can always be the case for others but I will always have
something more to say like Asimov.
And Asimov has nothing more to say.
So Iam like him.
And Iam not I have plenty more where that came from.
The future is just one long book and I have to fill in hours and
hours when I have nothing to do.
That is because I don't work and I have choosen this lifestyle.
It is not bad to not work.
But you have to fill in a lot of time.
So there a lot of things I can be doing rather than sitting here
feeling sorry for myself.
I don't expect the blasphermers to understand to them their job
is their life.
Work is power and knowledge means work.
or information means work.
And they will succeed because satan helps them.
But I will succeed too because God helps me.
And he is helping me to be healed right now.
So that the guy I was becoming at Redcliffe will be the guy Iam
now.
Because I was taking all the right steps towards a new life.
But I had some very serious problems.
And they are going to be comletely taken care of.
And I will start my new life today.
Because isaac means new life.
And he means a new covenant.
And God has made a new covenant with me.
To be my special friend and never let anything come between us.
So it is back to the future.
And it is forwards to the future.
And if I really set ut to make progress on proving Einstein wrong
I really could prove him wrong.
And was not always true I didn't understand why he was wrong.
But now I do it is as simple as 2+2=4.
2+2=4 can't apply to the big bang but it does apply to creation
ex-nihilo.
And that is the test of rationality.
The law of non contradiction can't apply to the big bang.
And it can apply to creation ex-nihilo.
And it is very good.
People can argue endlessly about it.
And it will prove nothing in particular.
Because they will believe whatever they want to.
And they won't worry if the big bang doesn't make sense.
In fact to them a balanced equation always makes sense.
But Iam saying unbalanced equations like 2+2=4 are rational.
And the expression 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1
APPLE/ORANGE is irrational.
Just like the big bang itslef all laws of physics break down.
And maybe not quantum mechanics.
And maybe even that.
It is another way of saying it can't happen just as an explosion.
There is more to it.
Then a big explosion.
But noone will ever doubt the third equation.
Because it just that kind of thing that makes me mad.
If someone comes up with something that does not make sense
everybody sais it is right.
But when you say add equations 2+2=4 evereybody sais it is wrong.
And that doesn't make any sense.
But it shows people are biased towards evolution.
They want the cosmos to evolve.
And that means it must change form.
So the idea of beginning with an opposite universe one that is
Godel suits evolution fine.
You get a non contradictory explosion because the big crunch is a
contradictory universe.
So that is the mechanism.
That is what people wanted of God to prove the Buddhist right and
make me one with everything.
And God just isn't one with everything.
The laws that apply to heaven don't apply on earth.
God may be three persons in one.
That does mean three equations that are different can be one.
And of course it does.
But six is mans number.
And seven is Gods number.
And put them together and you get 42.
And that is mans numbers and Gods numbers together.
And it is the worst possible thing.
And that is the way to understand it you cannot make anything in
Gods image.
Not even a theory.
And the big bang is a theory in Gods image.
And it must be incorrect or God would not have said ex-nihilo.
Because what went before was nothing.
And what went before the big bang must have been the big crunch..
If you can't decide then you are not alone.
Multitudes won't be able to decide between the two theories.
But that means they will keep an open mind to ex-nihilo.
And maybe that is better than deciding.
And teachers will teach the controversy and there is no sign of
that happening.
But maybe one day after Iam dead they will make me a saint.
At least in science.
And then everyone will learn my theories in school.
And that would be a good end except I wouldn't be there to see
it.
So that would not be so great.
But that is all the other great scientists got.
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve A Jeffrey
To: rouse@maths.ox.ac.uk
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:05 PM
Subject: ROGER
A way of proving the human brain chalk and a blackboard is superior to a computer mathematica.
Or a supercomputer.
Posted by STEVE at 8:30 PM 0 comments
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
* ▼ 2010 (2)
o ▼ May (1)
+ The Four Spiritual Laws - Flash
o ► April (1)
+ TRANSLATION
* ► 2008 (4)
o ► March (2)
+ TWO FOR THE MONEY AND THREE FOR THE SHOW
+ THE CAVE PAINTING
o ► January (2)
+ OMEGA
+ TO HOWARD WISEMAN
* ► 2007 (48)
o ► December (2)
+ LAST 20 PAGES OF IN THE SHADOW OF 9/11.
+ RAWHIDE
o ► November (1)
+ PI OPENS DOORS
o ► October (7)
+ BIG BANG COMPUTER SIMULATOR
+ DOCTORED RAT PI
+ SCIENCE TEN ACCOMPLISHMENTS STEVE A JEFFREY
+ HOW TO GROW HAIR ON A BALD HEAD.
+ SCRIPT FOR RADIO STATION INTERVIEW
+ THEORIES OF LIFE THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING.
+ TIME TRAVEL FILMS
o ► September (13)
+ OPEN LETTER TO BRAD CARTER USQ ABOUT THE SUN.
+ OPENN LETTER TO LOS ALAMOS AND BRYAN GREENE
+ OPEN LETTER TO BRYAN GREENE
+ OPEN LETTER TO LOS ALAMOS ABOUT A BETTER ATOMIC BO...
+ I SAW A UFO AND NOBODY BELIEVES ME.
+ STEVES BAD MUSIC BLOG.
+ OLD EXAMINATION RULE-LISTEN TO THE QUESTION
+ LARGE SPACE TELESCOPE-LST
+ THE PERFECT WILL OF GOD-YOU CAN"T HANDLE THE TRUTH...
+ THE LOST IN SPACE ROBOT WISDOM FROM
+ ASTROLOGY THE PROGRAM
+ THE ICING ON A PINEAPPLE UPSIDE DOWN CAKE AND COC...
+ THE HANDSHAKE EQUATION FOR THE BIG BANG
o ► August (25)
+ MANHATTAN PROJECT 2-SPLIT THE ATOM AND YOU GET 2
+ JAVA BIBLE CLOCK
+ NOT SCHRODENGERS CAT
+ EINSTEIN ON TRIAL
+ MECHANISM FOR THE BIG BANG
+ THE BIG BANG-PINOCCHIO A WOODEN BOY.
+ THE BEGINING- NON CONTADICTION
+ SEVEN DEADLY SINS
+ THE MYTHMAKERS AND THE RISKTAKERS.
+ PROGRAM FOR SUPERCOMPUTER
+ TEN LAWS OF CREATION SCIENCE
+ THE JESUS ANTHOLOGY-SUPERMAX
+ STRING THEORIES ARE RIDICULOUS 4#
+ 10 LAWS OF NON CONTRADICTION-AGREED VALUE
+ THE REPEATING VALUE OF PI
+ DOC BROWNS EXPERIMENT TO CHANGE HISTORY
+ DOC BROWNS KEY IS UNDER THE MAT
+ EINSTEINS' POLTEGEIST.
+ EINSTEIN PROVED WRONG BY SUPER STRING THEORY.
+ STRING THEORIES ARE RIDICULOUS 3.
+ TO ABRIDGE ETERNITY
About Me
STEPHEN JEFFREY
View my complete profile
DR STEVES MOST EXCELLENT FUDGE.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
The Four Spiritual Laws - Flash
Posted by STEVE at 10:45 PM 0 comments
Friday, April 9, 2010
TRANSLATION
Translation
Free Translation
Sunday, February 21, 2010
BLOG THE BOOK 2
If as I believe my thoery is true and it will be accepted by one compentant judge it will be a considerable step in science.Charles Darwin............No that I say Darwinism is right just that I think this quote applies equally to a thoery of ex-nihilo creation.
My theory of everything for WASP..
Steve Jeffreys collary to the law of non contradiction.
Opposite particles X and Y cannot be in the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME in the SAME PLACE THE EXCEPTION PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG...
FOUR STATES ARE ONE PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG AND THE FOUR FORCES DEPEND ON THE FOUR STATES SO THEY ARE ALSO ONE.
E=MC^2 depends on momentum an momentum is determined by state.
This is a means for a Big crunch to store the potential energy of a prexisting universe and release it as Kinetic energy in the big bang.
The mechanism is super critical non newtoinan fluids or four states of matter in one.....................
This give you a mechanism for the big bang you can use WASP To calculate the potential energy of the prexisting universe and the kinetic energy of the big bang.
You asked me to give you a thoery it is simplified it does not include determinism.
Determinism in the early universe maks it too complicated.Suffice to say qantum effects did not kick in until after the Big Bang everything prior to that was determinism rather than randomness.
The reason being is as you go back in time order or reverse entropy increases and becomes infinite.
I can argue there is no need for God but I don't want to.
And that is the characteristic of every true believer they want to believe.
Steve.
The universal energy equation is 2+2=4 Over a cycle the big bang and the big crunch have to balance 2+2=4.
But due to thermodynamics a little energy is lost with each cycle like a bouncing ball.
And to balance 2+2 so that it equals four we have to increase mass as it goes backward in time.
So that with infinite time we have infinite mass.Which EInstein said was a dealbreaker.............
Infinite mass is an impossibility.
And since it is the only way to make 2+2=4 balance.
Then there is another way that is for energy to be fetched like a bucket of water from dimension X nihilo.
Creative energy is fetched from ex-nihilo making the big bang balance for the universal energy equation 2+2=4.
Einsteins second equation for mass approaching the speed of light includes momentum.
And momentum is determined by state so when four states are one E=MC^2 is a different equation for prior to the big bang.
The universe doesn't balance it cannnot balance because it is an impossibility for mass to increase as you go backward in time.
Until it becomes an infinite mass universe..............
That means 2+2 does not equal four for the big bang.......The difference from four can be axactly calculated.............
And equations don't balance for 2+2=4 E=MC^2 doesn't balance for 2+2=4.
And maybe this is an atrifact of the original non balancing equation for energy...................
Of course there are three alternatives creaton exnihilo where the equation balances with energy from outside the universe.
A balanced universe where mass increases with energy lost from the bouncing ball.
An unbalanced universe where energy is lost but is not replaced...............
And for my money it is an unbalanced universe.
And that would be a bad bet.
But if you want to believe 2+2 does not equal four for the energy of the universe.
Then it is a good bet for an evolutionist.
That all equations should not balance but need an adjustment.
To get a thoery of everything.
So go ahead adjust 2+2=4 to agree with the universe.
And see if all equations make sense in one big unbalanced theory of everything.http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/bounce/energy.html
2+2=4 does not balance for 2 bounces+ 2 bounces= 4 Bounces.
Because energy is lost as heat.
Hence the ball eventually stops bouncing.
We can apply this to the occillatng universe theory....................
for 2+2=4 for the cycles of the universe big crunch big bang.Mass has to increase as you go backward in time..........
And with time that goes on forever there has to be infinite mass..
You have to start with 100% mass.
And it will eventually reach zero......................If the equation balances.
Two answers for everything can't be right because the bible said that two is the number of enmity with God.
So it could hardly be the answer to everything.
So it muts be possible to add two answers in 1/3s to get one answer.............
1/3 YING+ 1/3 YANG+ 1/3 YANG= 1
There is nothing wrong with the 1/3rd equation except that it makes two equations one.
And sometimes this is juts not possible. QM AND GR will work in tandem 2+2=4 for all but a few equations involvng the graviton.....................
Maybe it is possible to use the third equation to unify even these equatons involving the graviton into one equation for everything.
1/3 STRING THEORY+ 1/3 QM+ 1/3 GR= 1
This makes the three major thoeries not three seperate theories but one super theory.
Steve.
A model is a good model if it.
1. is elgant.
2.Contains few artbitrary or adjustable elements.
3. Agrees with and explains all existing observations.(including inflation)
4. Makes details predictions about future observations that can disprove or falsify the model if they are not borne out.
Hawkings model of 10^500 different universes with different laws cannot be observed so only one universe can be observed which my thoery explains adequately.
A particle such as a primordial atom cannot both be born and die at the same time without having a half life.
The particle started out as four states in one and it muts have started out as four states which became one in the big crunch.The thoery is when four states are one four forces also unify.Thus potential energy of the big crunch is converted into kintetic energy of the big bang.Or potential energy ex-nihilo creates one state of matter that is four states in one.That is the description of the primordial atom.
And in the big bang since there is no time it dies before it is born the concepts birth and death of the particle and half life have no meaning and are all mixed togther.
Time is mised togther past presnet and future.
Time must have existed from the very begining.
The paricle reaches a point whee times arror begins where it cannot go back and do it all over again
It can't go back to it's state of non existance it has to live and therefore it has to die.
There is a point where it can still return to the void from which it came............
It is TESTABLE because there is a point where the four states are two states in one.
And where they are four states in one 2+2=4.
/4=1
Gravity then reverses and becomes a superforce.
The direction of gravity can change back for a time then it becomes critical and it reaches the point where it cannot go back to the previous four states without an explosion of the primodordial particle.
Time in this case is the direction of gravitys arrow and time runs backwards beyond this point to the big crunch.
The blog is great.
And I really like it.
It is so good that I will end it right here.
And it has only just begun.
Because it one mans seearch for everything.
And it is a blog book and it can be as long as I want it to be.
Or as short as I would like it to be.
And that is as short as it is already.
Because I already have a blog book.
And my blog was deleted.
And there is no point in writing a blog if it gets deleted.
And maybe I could fin it on some disc.
But Jessu doesn't want a parrot I can always start another blog.
And it will be juts as good.
But people will always encroach upon my style.
They will always say he has no sense of appropriateness.
And I cannot even spell it.
And my grammer is bad it is just so utterly boring.
And that is intelligent design it is so boring I don't even want tgo think about it.
It is so utterly boring.
And that is what my blog is.
It is utterly and completely boring.
Without a little help from jesus.
He is my rock.
And he is my fortress.
In Him will I trust.
And I don't need to be a parrot anymore adn think that that is what God wants from me just someone to write books.
Gods gift is for my love and my pleasure is to help one I love.
And God helps me to help myself.
And that is a great thing.
Because if anyone knows he exists I do yet I waste my time chasning rainbows.
That is what a thoery of everything really is.
It is chasing ghosts or windmills it is a glorious and futile quest.
God has already told us it came out of nothing.
And ex-nihilo is a satisfactory explaination for how the universe began.
And they don't like it because they believe in the big bang.
And they don't.
And I'm not sure that the big bang is what the bible means when it says ex-nihilo.
I'm pretty sure the problems with the big bang as as big as making something out of nothing with noone in charge.
And if you ever tried to make something with no one in charge you will know you don't get anything worthwhile.
You need a teacher to help you to make something.
Otherwise you just get a footstool for someones foot.
That is not very good.
And it is great if you have done it yourself.
And that is what this blog is all about I have done it myself with a little help from the Lord.
And it has been like a parrot and it has been like a footstool.
It is has been my own work.
ANd God helped me to think clearly about the big bang.
And no one ever thinks clearly about it.
And my heor is John hartnett who thnks clearly about everything.
He thinks about whether the bible is true.
And if it is is true how does that effect the thoery.
And his book about the big bang is just about the best book I have ever read.
Except for Hawkings when he believed there was a God.
But his latest book is juts bable.
bable to 10^500th power that is how much nonsense it takes to make a multiverse.
And thi skind of nonsense is what my computer porgram produces.
So I have succeeded in physics but not as I have hoped I have shown string thoery to be nonsense and not the answer to heaven and hell.
Because there is limbo and that makes 4 dimensions + 3 and that is 7.
And that is a good thoery because it agrees with all the observations.
And it is elegant.
And above all this blog is elegant.
It is a thoery of everything in a nutshell.
It is consise and doesn't contain ambigiuities.
Stating it simply and explaining everything is what science does.
It is occams rasor.If it is the simplist explaination it is probably right.
And that is why science is always wrong.
Because the simplist explaination is that God did it.
And He wants to show us how to work it out.
And He doesn't.
He wants us to have faith faith is all the proof we need.
And after examining the big bang cross examining the witnesses it is clear that they are blind dumb and stupid and that they have seen nothing.
And that the bible when it is sais nothing.
Means someone.
Not something.
We just may leave it there.We won't be a parrot.But we will will use this blog to explain our theory of everything.The circular dimensions include time.
And to convert four into three you use my time formula which converts 0 eccentricity into 0.02..............
And my forumula is very accurate within six minutes per year of sidereal time...................
So converting string theory is a matter of converting a circular orbit of 360 days in ten dimensions to an eliptical orbit of 365 days and three dimensions.....................
Then you can put string theory together with Einsteins like twister theory.
Draw a 360 day circular earth orbit in 10 dimensions with an eccentricity of zero convert to an eccentricty of 0.002 using my time formula.
Then the ten dimenesions will be expressed in three dimensions.
The devil doesn't want God to make it right.
And God can take any lemon and make lemonaide.
And God can take any situation and make it right.
And faith without work is dead and it was never intended to discourage.
But it be a sawhorse that if you don't have work you can't make a difference.
And of course you can do whatever comes to hand.
And whatever you find that you are good at you should do with all of your heart.
And if you find anything to do.
You should just quit.
And that isn't life to give up.
There is always something to do that matters.
Like blogging which does not matter even a little bit.
If I blog or don't blog life goes much the same.
And life always goes better with a blog.
I searched for everything and I found a theory of everything.
But it did not go to plan.
I expected others would share my passion.
And that they would take an interest in what I was doing.
They did not share my passion and they did not take an interest.
So what is the point of telling the world in a blog.
How dissapointed Iam.
Iam dissapointed that no one understands.
And I should not expect anyone to understand my blog because I speak in tongues.
And I might speak my heavenly fathers own language.
And it makes no sense to unbelievers.
And that means to born again christians because they don't understand tongues anymore than anyone else.
Tongues of angels and they don't understand my lack of love.
And if they had been alone for all these years they would understand.
As God understands that lonelyness is hard to overcome.
Because the lonely don't make good friends.
And other people ar lonely and they want someone to be their friend.
But you have to want more than just a friend.
And life is like that you have to be interested in more than one thing.
And Iam only interested in little things.
That interest me.
And that is just the way Iam.
I like one little thing and not a lot of things.
But I could try to like other things but then there would not be time for the things that interest me.
And there is all the time in the world for the things Iam interested in.
But no time for anything that is outside my little universe.
1/ Einsetins dice can make QM and GR one by unifying classical theories like Maxwells and EInsteins with QM.Making randomness orderely
2/ 2+2=4 program produces one equation for everything.
3/ Clock equation makes 10 dimensions 3 dimensions.
The hope of doing somethign that matters is just a hope.
But it keeps people from unhappiness.
And it kept me bored and unhappy.
So what is hope is it hope for the future.
or is it hope for the present.
We can hope that here is something for us right now.
Rather than hope for something in the future that never will come to pass.
They say that girls were wrong to play ping pong and they didn't know that they were chineese girls and everything in the chineese language is reversed is reversed.
And that means we can convert Einsteins theory of eliptical orbits of the earth into a circular orbit of ten dimensions effectiviely converting Eintein to string and back again.
And this Steves most excellent fudge.
And clock is a memorial stones to the God is Israel who proved hawking wrong for the final time.
And there is no hawking.
Because there is a God of israel.
And the God of israel has declared war on Stephen hawking.
And it is the other way around.
God still loves Stephen and has done everything to make his life better.
And he is not grateful instead he blames God for his sickness.
And he has never said that God is to blame.
But he feels hurt that God has not made him better.
And maybe one day it will be nnot as Stephen haking Hopes.
Because life can be like that.
It can be not as we have hoped but we still succeed we still overcome.
And Hawking has to accept that it will be not as he had hoped but it be even better.
because it may be better than he had hoped.
New technolgy may mean he can control his computer with his mind.
And he may not be finished with his books.
It may be not as God hoped for the next one one to prove 2+2=4 right.
Becaus ehis next one will prove God wrong.
And if it does prove God right that it will be not as Hawking had hoped.
But he can't deny the evidence.
And that is exactly what I hope that the evidence form my computer program is so convincing that even Hawking will admit there is a God.
And my thoery o converting a ten dimnsional circle into an elipse.
Is impossible and if it is imnpossible then my clcok doesn't make sense.
And that is quite possible that my clock is not more accurate than sidereal time.
But six minutes out.
and if it is out it is not a conversion of a circle into an elipse.
But if it is not out then the six minutes is significant.
ANd makes a difference when you convert a ten dimesionsional circle into a 3 dimensional elipse.
But it is imossible M theory is impossible and it might because you CANNOT convert Ten dimensions into three.
If you could then Einstein could be converted into ten dimesions.
And that would be just as I had hoped.
That it is impossible.
And it might not be I might have hoped M theory could make sense in four dimensions.
being a fan of twister theory at least I know what I like.
And four dimensions is what I like...........
I don't like ten I can't understand ten so I don't believe they exist I cannot observe them therefore they are not science.
I can observe four dimensions of an eliptical orbit.
And all of the orbits in other universes must be circular.
And if they are then the other universes are unstable and will fall apart.
But they must be circular if they contain more than three dimesions.
And hawking has not thought this through.
And I have on his behalf.
We can convert one dimension and that is time.
Time can be in ten dimensions and it is still 360 days.
But if the orbit is unstable the number of days is not the same.
And when we convert it to an elipse it is an orbit which never could exist
If we convert the nine other dimenisons from circular to eliptical then we would be cooking with gas.
We wuold have the formula to convert Einsteins thoery to string theory and back again.
But we ccan't convert none dimesions like we can the one dimension of time.
Time really can be converted from circular to eliptical the number of degrees equals the number of days.
And this orbit in unstable and it might be a much more stable orbit than the earth is actually in.
Because it is perfect.
Whereas the earths orbit involves a wobble.
Which may not always have existed before the flood.
Th eearth is tilted if it were not tiled maybe my clock would be 100% accurate.
Because it is a theoretical perfect elipse based on a prefect circular orbit.
And it measn nothing.And it just might mean everything.
The fact that it is so close to sidereal time.And that is just a coincidence.
But if you getvthe right answer any other time is it a coicidence or is your working right.I think my working is right.
And if it is a coersion of time then it is alos a conversion of space.
That is one thing that is very clear baout converting a circle into an elipse it is converting time and space.
So it is converting dimension as well.
If the circular dimension is more than three then converting to an elipse will convert it to three.
And it must be some kind of mistake or an impossibility.
And maybe converting dimesions form ten to three is impossible.
And it might totally as easy as jujst converting time.
That may convert space as well.
Then my clock is a thoery of everything.
And that is what the clock always has been Newtons theory of everything.
And Newton is dead but he still speaks through the clock.
Because this kind of orbit was his idea.
And it goes back to another man.
Who lived a long time ago.
Becaus eorbits have been calculated from the year dot.
And they have been converted from before time itself.
So it not going to lead to a time machine.
There I ahve said it now it is not going to happen.
And I could take that attitude that be mentioning that you convert then dimensions to three that means you can travel through other dimensions.
And it might mean just that.
If man were that clever that he could figure out how to travel through time/space.
And if he is meant to travel faster than light then one day someone will come ujp with a better theory about how to do it.
But my theory is just to convert dimensions on paper.
And it is a map.
of the universe.
And iof ten dimesions are unstable then the eleipse genereated from an unstable circular orbit will also be unstable.
And an elipse is not an unstable orbit.
But it can be wrong.
But a perfect orbit cannot really exist.So it is only a hyothetical.
And it is a really good fusge.
Because there a better way to convert a circle into an elipse and that is eccentricity.
And if it works why hasn't someone thought about it before.
No one has because you can't convert a perfect circle into a perfect elipse.
And you can't convert a perfect circle into an imperfect elipse.
It is all about perfection myt time equation is 100% right.
Where the earths orbit is slightly wrong.
And the earth orbit must be right just the way it is.
Then my clock is six minutes out and the six minutes will be shown to be an important calculation taht has to do with imperfection.
Because the earth will be more perfect that a conversion of a circle into an elipse.
Perhaps it is ID that six minutes it is necessary on a bike that is a bell.
ANd is that six minuets necessary in earths orbit it sure is necessary.
So if the clock is wrong there is not much point is trying to convert space as well as time.
Because it will give the right answer for space.
And nothing could be closer to the truth.
It may not be the right answer for the earth but it will be the rigth answer for time/space.....
Take the clock and shove it.
I would if it knew where to put it because it doesn't suit the mantle of any university.
They don't want to know about a bible Pi clock because you can't use Pi or the bible to calculate time.
let alone both.
And it is both and it is right.The earth may have had a circular orbit in the begining which dcayes into an eliptical one.
And that is very possible if you know what you are talking about.
because the more you know about orbits the better off you would be.
But a circular orbit cannot decay into an elipse.
And if it can why can't it be true.
That the earth started about at 360 days in duration.
So we have five days difference and that is not six minutes.
But you can convert a circular orbit into an elipse.
And that is just it.
You can.
Now at the begining of the 21st century faced with scienitfic claims like neo-Darwinism and the multiverse (many universes) hypothesis in cosmology invented to avoid the overwhelming evidence for puprose and design found inmodern science the Catholic Church will again defend human nature by proclaiming the the immanent deisgn in nature is real Archbishop of Vienna.Quote fromHawkings book page 163.
The book is finished.
And it really is.
I have no more to say about the subject.
And Iam going to end the book.
Because a blog book does not need to bevery long.
It can be very interesting.
If it is kept short.
And the best thing about my blog book is everything I have written.
Because ntohing that I have written has been greater than a blog.
And everything I have written has just been the greater gift of blogging.
And everythig is right about blogging.
It means the glory goes to God.
And everybody who reads this blog shall enjoy it.
A unstable circular orbit in ten dimensions can be covnerted to a stable eliptical orbit in three dimensions.
If as the experts believe this equation is not reversible and Einsteins four dimensions of space time cannot be converted to ten.
Then string theory is proved wrong by the law of reversibility a thoery has to work in reverse for it to work at all.
Correct me if Iam wrong but I think this is like Jesus is the way the truth and the life something undeniable.
This proves the multiverse wrong also that hawking believes in instead of God.
Because it requires ten spacial dimensions to work.
ALexander hardigan had lost emma he no longer cared about life.
And that is what you have to be like to try to build a time machine.You have tyo be tired of living.
And alexander knew the patent clerk.
And he had an equation E=MC^2.
And that was in three dimesions.So he thought of adding a fourth dimension time.
And then reversing the equation for conversion of a circular 360 day orbit of the earth to an eliptical 365 day orbit.
Where the circular orbit is in higher dimesions and unstable.
But when it is converted to an eliptical orbit it is stable.
And it is instabilty which makes time travel possible.
Now it is aload of twaddle but we have to make a movie and we have to have stuff on a blackboard.
So ALex doesn't define time like Einsteins but as an eliptical orbit using Newtons equations.
Because time is absolute and he has a clock that proves this.
And that is is what movies are all about.
The scientist has a clock that proves you can travel in time.
ANd of course it proves the opposite.
So he has to reverse the equations so he can reverse time.
I need not have worrried I can't stop anyone from building a time machine and I can't help themdo it either.
If they built it by it'svery nature it would be something that is meant to be and could not be changed before the fect.
Because causualty would be in the future and it would strech back to when that phone call was smade.
And nothing could cause the phone call to not be made.
Except ereasing Alexs blackboard.
And so very serious Alex has a blackboard with pictures of an eliptical orbit and a circular orbit in ten dimensions.And has equations that convert ten dimesions of time/space to four dimensions.
And it is nonsense.
And it really might be nonsense just somehting I thought up to go along with the clock.
The clock must prove something.
And it might as well prove it all.
And anything thta is a little toe can prove it all.
Einsteins dice can prove it all Alexander could have had Einsteins dice.
And they obey classical rules like 1 ODD THROW+1 EVEN THROW= 2 ODD THROWS.
and 2 ODD THROWS+2 EVEN THROWS=4 EVEN THROWS.
And this unifies quantum mechnanics randomness with Einsteins order.
And thus you can predict the future of particles.
And if you can predict the future maybe you can travel into it.
And that is what Alexander put on the blackboard.........
and it is just for fun and it is not fun that is when it gets crazy when it is no longer fun to go back.
When it an obessession with changing something like Emmas death.
Then it very dark.
And it is a question about why he can't change it.
And the Morlock gave the answer that in the future he had with emma it was another universe where the timemachine did not exist.
So the timemachine caused emmas death.
and that is as positive as you can be about time travel it will cause the very thing you are trying so hard to prevent.
And that is negative.
It will change something but what is it that you are going to change.
is it the whole thing.
Or is is just emmas death.
Alex hardigan added two circular orbits in ten dimesions to two eliptical orbits in three dimension and got four dimensions.
he got an extra dimension which is time.
And nobody cna answer the question what was on ALexs Blackboard becaus eno one can actually travel through time.
I will reserve my judgement on the quantum telephone whethe rit works and cannot change anything.
But it must work by going two ways which means reversing the equation and converting four diemnsions into 2 lots of ten and 2 lots of three.
Which is a total of 26 dimensions.
and this the number of Alex hardigan if he ever builds his quantum telephone.
I would prefer to believe it is a delusion of granduer and that timetravel even quantum is impossible.
But the fact that a telephone is a quantum device as well as a classical one takes it out the realm of science fiction.
But it would ruin everything.And it might ruin all kinds of things.
Or maybe the nature of things is that it could change nothing.That nothing could be corrected.And that everything would already have happened.
ANd thats hard to understand because when the future and the past are joined by a telphone.The future is fixed like in revelations it is written and cannot be changed.
because you cna write it down at the other end of the telphone.
So I hope Iamnot runing everything by talking about my experiences with telephone calls from the future.I know that I cannot remember anything about the future.
And maybe that is just the right thing that I don't remember what I was told.
Because if I did remember I would try to change history.
And it cannot be changed.
And that is for the best...................
Dailtone wrote a script about the quantum telephone and it was a great script.
People needed to know when they would die.
So perhaps the call from the future was made after my death.
That would make sense because then notghing could be changed.
It is ineviatble that they will call people after they are dead.
Because peoplewho are bad wants to talk with the dead.
And the bible forbids this kind of communicatioon.
And quantum telephones are ruled out because of Einsteins theory of relativity.
And they might require absolute time as with newtons equations.
And that is the best science science that rules it out.
I would rule it out too as a mental abberation or a hoax.
And either is possible.
A girlcan be so right that she is wrong...............She is 100% right for you so she is 100% wrong as well.
That is what my theory of four states in one and four forces being one as a consequence.
It is so right to believe the equation for the universe must balance.
That is wrong.
And the way on which it is wrong is exnihilo.
Everthing must come form nothing which is an unbalanced thermodynamic equation.
But if energy comes fromanother dimension that it can balance with matter.
As E=MC^2 so energy is equal to matter..
And the delaer deals the cards and the delaer has dealt the cards that Iam playing with.
And maybe it is a bad hand.
But I will make the most of it that is all anyone can do.
I have been dealt a bad hand that is what faraday could have said that I don't have any skill at math.
But he didn't say he could not do science.
Just because he could not do experiments.And I can only do thought experiments.
But they are good and they are enough to make a thoery work.
And that is just it this is a bad hand.
And you have been dealt a better hand so share someof your cards with me.
That is what people never think of doing because they are competitive.
and don't let me start on Hamburger University it is a university where they study all kinds of Physics without the MATH.
It is Faradays Hamburger University where kids that are B level students can study and get a degree in physics.
An associate diploma. And they can go from B-A and study a graduate diploma where some of the math is attempted at a B level.
And you can't teach math to a dog and that is the joke that they made on the elegant universe.
And can make an attempt to teach physics maths at a B level.
ANd anything is possible.
There could be another faraday.
And lets hope so but it will be not as we have hoped........
And it always is more than we expect.
And often it is less than we expect.
But Faradays university of B level physics is for average students to take physics as far as it possible for them to go.And take it no further than their abilities allow.
It is a dream that is a nightmare.
For practicing physics professors.
Because they want you to learn everything BEFORE You study physics.
And that is totally right so right that it is totally wrong.
YOu don't have to learn everything before you make up your first theory.
You shoud make up your first theory in physics on day one.
And always remember that it was wrong.
BecauseMonday, May 12, 2008
MAN WITH EINSTEINS MISSION 2
The interesting thing is I have no idea what Iam doing.
And of course I think Iam doing something good.
And Iam right Iam really doing a good thing.
And If I was wrong I would only be adding to the trouble people have.
And there is plenty of toruble.
But I can't add one little thing to peoples troubles.
And I can only do them good.
And that is what I should believe.
If Iam to write more because I should be convinced that I first do no harm.
And Iam not certain about that.
And everyone who is not certain has to have faith that what they mean for good won't be turned to evil.
And it my faith that has changed everything.
Because I did not know why I was doing a thing.
And now I think I dod understand.
Although I may be wrong.
But regardless of that I think I know the truth.
About why Einstein is wrong.
And of course there is no truth about why Einstein is wrong.
And there really is a good explaination of why his maths doesn't work.
For all the other theories that have to make sense as well.
They all have to be non contradiction.
And only Einsteins thoery has to be contradiction since it makes one of everything.
And you can't make one of everything without having contradictions.
But they are small.
And in fact they are very large.
And very many.
And they don't make sense.
Unless we complelety change the foundation of mathematics.
And that is what we have done.
And we have left the foundation as Aristotle and tried to prove Einsteins theory with Aristotle and of course this doesn't work.
Einstein and Aristotle are two different things.
That means Einstein and ordinary mathematics are two different things.
And there are problems ordinary maths breaks down at the big bang Einsteins thoery doesn't apply.
But we can add the the third equation and then everything is one.
BUt does that truely explain why Einstein is right.
Posted by STEVE at 2:08 AM 1 comments
RICHARD THOMAS- A MAN WITH EINSTEINS MISSION.
Garrett Lise had his theory then he wrote his book.That inspires me to write my book about a completed theory.
Because when I wrote before I didn't know what I was doing.
I didn't have any idea where it would end up.
Now I don't even know what I intended in the first place.
Because I have a much better theory that energy is greater than.
As a matter of fact it is the same theory only mass is greater than.
Because for energy to balance with mass mass has to be greater than energy simply because all of the mass will not ever be converted to energy.
Some must be lost in conversion.
So mass keeps getting more massive.
And that is just it I have completed my theory so now I don't want to talk about it.
But that is silly.
It is obvious that with each generation of universes mass must become more massive.
Because energy is lost each time.
And that doesn't make sense even to me.
But assume it is right it can be a guess that is better than some peoples calculations.
Energy is required for outer space that is from another dimension.
And maybe that is inner space and it is exactly that.
But energy is not required if it is evolution.
And to balance 2+2=4 the universes must become more massive as you approach the begining of time.
And if that isn't right and I haven't doubted until now.
The mass and the energy of the big crunch and the big bang must be identical.
And identical means the unviverse doesn't become more massive but energy is not lost.
And it is so eventually we would reach infinite energy.
And the alterntive is that we would reach infinite mass.
And that makes perfect sense mathematically.
Indeed it is a mathematical model of the unvierse.
And the fact that it begins with A Godel universe means everything.
That it is positivist.
It just happens that a Godel unviverse fits my facts it begins with a non contradiction.
That is maths that is 2+2=4.
And it ends in a big crunch that it is a contradiction.
That is maths taht is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
That is 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 FERMI/DIRAC= 1 BOSE EINSTEIN CONDENSATE.
And if this equation is true that the unviverse may have begin with a bose Einstein condenstate.
And it may have applications for physics.
because we may be able to make a fermi dirac condensate.
And it si juts the opposite we add two parts fermi dirac to one part Bose Einstein.
And a unviverse that is Godel cannot begin with a non contradiction.
And everything is saying that a contradictory universe can begin with a non contradiction.
So the universe prior to the big crunch would be a non contradictory universe like our own.
It is a circle where there are opposites.
And every circle is two opposites.
So thats the explaination.
And you haven't understood.
And I don't think another ten pages would help even a little bit.
Because the unviverse cannot be evolutionary because it becomes too massive.
It must be creationary science it must have started with a big Zap.
A big zap of energy from another dimension makes the two universes balance.
2+2=4.
Otherwise we would have to say that 2+2 doesn't equal four exactly that a little bit of energy is lost.
And a little may prove to be a lot.
So it might be a big difference to mathematics.
But we can assume 2+2 does equal four and the unvierses become more massive as time approaches zero.
And it must approach zero if it reaches infinity.
And then can be rounded off to zero.
I don't have any thng more to say for today.
And I do say it will be nice proving the theory right.
Because I have always begun the other way.
And now I know what Iam trying to prove.
But If my theory proves to be wrong then all my work is not worthless.
And that is like newton it is still a good thoery.
It fits the mathematics maybe better than any thoery every has.
It is Einsteins mission to prove everything is one.
And Iam Richard Thomas and Iam a man with Einsteins mission.
Only I can't prove it it be one.
I have to prove it to be 2+2=4.
If we have just one unviverse that the same applies to balance the equation we have to get energy from another dimension.
And it is easy to prove creation but it not easy with one universe to prove evolution.
Posted by STEVE at 12:33 AM 0 comments
Saturday, April 26, 2008
BLOG THE BOOK 12.
So we have finally decided to give the starwriter away.
And of course there are two starwriters so we shall service one and keep it and give the other away.
And it is a great gift for christmas.
But christmas can come early.
And everyone will rejoice.
Because they will say when Stephen gave Josh the starwriter it was like christmas.
Gods will was done on earth as it is in heaven.
I have no more to say because I can't talk about equations.
And of course I have plenty to say.
But not to those who love equations.
But even to them.
You can lvoe a thing to death and I have loved it to death.
It has reached it's final conclusion.
As one man said the things of God are clearly understood by the creation so they have no excuse.
And they have an answer of sorts to prove why God is wrong.
But they cannot resist the wisdom by which Stephen Speaks.
And that is why they want to crucify him.
And they have choosen the worst weapon of all his reputation.
But he is not alone all the believers have the reputation dragged through the mud.
And noone is immune to persecution.
But you can do something about it.
And that is not seek glory and fame.
And glory and fame is for those who do not believe.
For they will have their fill of what it means to be full of pride.
And maybe they will bow to Jesus and Ask him to be their king. further study willprove it right and it may that is what theories are all about.BLOG THE BOOK 1 AND 2
Todays diary,
I called ben Joans computer repair man and made an appointment
for the seventh of Feburary.
He won't be there that week so his technican will handle the job.
I also might get a manual on my Pioneer.
I can get it serviced but it is going to cost me $59 upfront.
Pussy has been eating mince that is good because we don't ever
know what to feed her,but she has been meowing too much.
Mum thinks she might be in pain.
But I don't think so she is OK.
Steve Patrick refunded the $100 I sent him by mistake.
Both guys are named Steve.
So it is going to take a few days for my paypal refund to clear.
Then I can pay Steve Cooper and he should get started on Sensible
girl on Thursday.
That is if he got his money I don't think he willl start until he
gets his hundred dollars.
Josh is still working on Branagan and Flanaggan.And I have told
him I will pay him in two weeks.
I had better be careful as I have to pay for the computer also in
two weeks.
But Joan sais her repair guy is reasonable.
But the question is what does Joan consider reasonable.$
Will it be cheaper than Drews $50.
Drew is a great guy but it looks like he will be replaced by
another guy.
The noone reads my blog I might as well write a book syndrome.
That is the name of this dairy.
I intend to reminse and talk about the past and the future.
How can I talk about the future.
The future of my song Back to the Future with the Chevy Ford
band.
I have asked them to play the songs warming up their instruments.
So people will always hear them first before they go on.
Rawhide is great for warming up instruments.
This machine is really hunky dory.It works 100% and only cost
$20.
The kids will like it much better than a typewriter.
My friend Ralphs kids I mean I might make a gift of it to Hanna
if she is a budding writer.
You just never know if someone is going to be a writer and you
always do.
The nonone ever reads my blog I will write a book syndrome.
That is what Iam talking about.
That is why Iam using a wordprocessor rather than a computer.
There is no accounting for taste.
And maybe there is an accounting for taste.
We has better watch out.!
I won $20 last night and actually I won $35 but I lost $15 back.
If I have sandwhiches for lunch I will be able to pay my RSL
fees.
So I can go to the club in the future.
I will have enough for busfare and my RSL fees.
Fixing the pioneer is a big expense I have to put $59 down.
And that is taken off the repair bill.
And I have to pay a courier to deliver the parcel.
I think I will because the girl said it was up to me.
And it is mum would not do it let alone dad.
But I can pay whatever it costs to get the Pioneer working again.
My theory of the big bang.
Four states of matter in one state and four forces one.
That means state and forces are one thing.
2 STATE+ 2 FORCE= 4 STATE/FORCE.
Now that is an equation really a theory for everything.
We should be able to prove that supercritical non newtonian fluid
has only two states.
And as a result only two forces there we have our equation for
the begining of the universe 2+2=4.
Maybe 2+2=4 is not such a bad equation for the begining.
But what if the maths was always non contradictory.
If it is never 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
Like my book sais.Only Einstein sais the math can be works out as
a non contradiction.
Is Einstein wrong and Stephen Jeffreys right.
That depends on what Stephen Jeffreys really believes.
Does he believe that the maths is a non contradiction and that
creaation began ex-nihilo.
Not out of a phase change from one state of matter to four.
That would produce the energy OK but what about the ID.The
intelligent design.
It is taken for granted.
But without it would there be order in a disorderly universe.
Can we build a bomb based on supercritical non newtonian fluid.?
Since nobel was an exposives manufacturer perhaps he would give
me his prize if I could make an explosive producing a plasma from
supercritical non newtonian fluid.
Then all four forces and four states would be one.
But am I right is finding correspondance between state and force.
No one is sure they ask thier local scientist.
Blacksmith friend.
Blacksmith friend Iam not sure you will ever solve time with my
Godel time machine.
But Godel has a universe which is opposite to our own in which
their are closed time loops.
Maybe it is opposite in being a non contradiction at the
begining.
If that is true then the maths works out in A godel universe for
the big bang.
A unified field theory is a possibility and the opposite is a
black hole in a Godel universe.
The reverse of this maths should give us the big bang in our
universe.
This is enough to keep mathematicians busy for centuries.
Or at least for five minitues.
It should keep them quiet for the scientist babysitters who are
minding the mathematicians making sure they are empirical.
But the baby sitters haven't done a very good job.
My thoery of everything is a universal program.
One that is a superomega 2+2=4 is a superomega when it is used to
get one equation for everything in a theory of maths.
But physics and maths are very similar if you can get one
equation for phsyics you can also get one for maths.
But omega means you can't or does superomega mean you can.
It gets confusing.
Wolframs celular automaton means you don't use maths to get the
rules for everything.
So in a sense it means Omega is right.
You have to go beyond maths to make it an experimental science.
Really these two things are the same.
Dad is really mentally unbalanced he listens to the radio and Tv
all day long.
And whenever I try to talk he tells me to shut up and listen to
the radio.
It has just gotten worse and worse over the years.
It shows what happens when you let habits get to you...
A habit is a force for evil.
Good habits are a force for good.
Like learning to fix watches.It is just too expensive.
And that is the whole trouble there are so many things to buy.
It would be good if everything were all on one kit.
Easy to use.
But it isn't easy and it might not be too hard.
Time will tell the future is what we make it.
If I could fix watches I could have a big house with a Big plasma
TV and a wife to go with it.
You can't have a wife unless you can support her.
That is what Will Robinson said about Sleeping beauty.
I paid Steve Cooper $100 today for Simply Sensible.
He said he would talk to Juli about doing the song.
They don't have any answers because they are not asking any
questions.
Like what would an ex-nihilo theory look like.
How would it differ from the big bang theory.
What if we add billions of years to exnihilo what do we get.
Rubbish that is what everyone might say.
But I don't think so.
Ex-nihilo is a non contradictory begining for the universe the
four states of matter are always four and the forces never become
one.
So the contradiction equation 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE=
1 APPLE/ORANGE is not true.
This arguement against the big bang is so strong mathematically.
That the only recource of the blaphemer is ad hominum arguements
against me.
They find scientific arguements ineffective.
This is because Einstein wanted a non contradictory theory of
everything.
And what we have is a contradictory theory of everything where
opposite particles X and Y are in the same space and the same
time in the same state.
The non contradictory thoery of everything would be creation in
the Godel universe where the maths that is the reverse of our
system could make sense.
This is just a begining for a creation ex-nihilo theory of
everything.
Everything including the expansion of the universe needs to be
taken into account.
Iam getting my computer fixed next pay as well as paying part
payment on two songs.
So money is going to be tight.
I wonder when I will ever have any money to just have a good
time.
Steve Cooper has booked Juli for next Friday.
He has recorded parts of the song Simply Sensible.
Steve Coopers son is in Jumped and Alien Versus Predator 2.
And I asked Steve Cooper if the girl from Dr Phil.
Could record in his Houston Studios and have pizza with the band.
Chevy Ford band.
The future is not ours to see.
But I figure if I have mercy on someone else that is trying to
make it it will water me as well.
One favour deserves another.
And it is by doing people favours who one day will be successful.
That one succeeds yourself.
Look at Kevin Rudd I tried to help him get elected.
He is now helping the homeless my main thing.
But he still refuses to put intelligent design in Australian
schools.
Maybe the unions won't let him.
It really matters to me as much as homelessness.
But how much does it matter to Kevin Rudd that creation is taught
in schools.
One would think it would matter a little to any christian.
Except an evolutionist and then he would want reasons to believe
curriculum taught in schools.
Either way it is the thought that counts remembering God when it
comes to what we teach our kids.
Next pay my major challenge is to give Stephanie Nickel a deposit
of $200 or more for the last stage of our script IN THE SHADOW OF
9/11.
It is a good script so far and Iam hoping Steph can finish it
without ruining the first 60 pages.
It has gone the way that I wanted it to go and it is important to
be true to yourself.
I would like a pair of crocs shoes.
And maybe they will have to wait if I want to pay Stephanie.
Unless I pay half the bill for Broadband this pay and the other
half next pay.
Supercritical non newtonian fluid does that mean 2 STATES+ 2
FORCES= 4 STATE/FORCE.
I think it really does although Iam not certain going from that
to plasma unifes the four states and four forces.
It is the subject of experiment.
And experiment can answer all questions.
Eddington said don't worry if the observations don't mathc your
theory the observations are probably wrong.
This is the opposite to the empirical approach to science.
Maybe you need a philosophy that can be tested by observations.
Maybe if science is not grounded in philosophy it can't work.
Was that what Eddington was trying to say.
For example there were not observations of an expanding universe
in Einsteins time so he modified his theory with the cosmological
constant which he later called his greatest blunder.
The future is ours to see.
And of course it was not Einsteins to see the future.And anyone
who makes up a thoery doesn't know whether it will be right.
But they should believe in it.
And to believe in it it has to add up.
It has to be as sensible as 2+2=4.
Then you can be certain that it is right.
And if it is really really simple then it cannot be wrong.
Yet even simple things can be wrong.
Simple observations of the way things work can be in error.And
observations are never wrong.
So If I base a theory on an observation that entropy reverses
when ice freezes.
then I cannot be wrong when I say entropy reverses for the big
bang.
But it doesn't.
And it has to to explain the order in the universe.My ramblings
juts off the top of my head.
Are as good as mud.
And they might be as clear as mud.
But totally interesting anyway.
And there is nothing unclear about my ramblings.
There is no future for rambling.
And there is a great future for blogs of all kinds.And maybe the
blog will never replace the book.
And it is Blog the book.
That is what this book is one big blog.
And it is exciting to have my starwriter on my desk.
Because writing is a slow process.
And if I leave it in the lounge room I will have a book in no
time.
One that isn't very good.And one that is just fine.
So what kind of a book will it be now.
A book about everything.
About totally anything I find interesting.
And the starwriter makes a great gift for me.
Because I can see what Iam writing.
And it is better than a computer.
It is great for writing my blog.
And what do I want to winge about.
If you are writing a blog you must want to winge about something.
And I do I want to winge about why it is so.
Because there is nothing worse than winging.
And asking why the problem exists in the first place.
is the first step towartds solving it.
So why do indentical particles X and Y exist in the SAME PLACE at
the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME.
I would say that they don't.
If I didn't believe the big bang.
And the big bang means 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1
APPLE/ORANGE is TRUE.
And if it is true identical particles can occupy the SAME SPACE.
Why is it so.?
And that is our problem why does this equation mean something
which cannot be true.
The answer is it does mean two opposites can be one.
But it also means identical particles can be made one.
And maybe both are true.
But to add identical particles you have to split them in 1/3s.
And maybe you only have to take a third of a particle
matematically.
And this is really interesting.A third of a particle
mathematically is a third of a particle.
It will behave just as if you had split the particle three ways.
So there is nothing to stop us putting three identical particles
togther on paper.
And that is a solution to fusion.
If we could do it in reality and not just on paper.
Then we could take three hydrogens and get one hydrogen.
Hydrogen three.
And that isn't it it is a new particle of hydrogen based on three
divided particles.
And maybe it is the answer.
But will never know if we don't ask the question why is it so.?
Why would three particles becoming one.
Generate power.
It is a answer to a prayer.
Because it might be an answer to a hope.
That one can be three.
Because splitting one into three is what three thirds are all
about.
But three into one is exactly the same process.
And it really is not.
It is putting humpty back togther again.
And if a third of a particle can exist at all.
Then it can be joined to another two thirds of a particle.
So we take the particle apart and then we put it back togther
again.
And that is humpty dumpty.
And it is a sound theory.
But putting particles togther in the same place at the same time
when they are identical.
Is plausible.
If we are dealing with forces on a par with the big bang.
Then paricles may disintegrate and reunite all the time.
What is my purpose noting les than nuclear oblivian.And of course
I ahve higher hopes than that for a world on the brink of war.
And it is insane to have high hopes.Ad it might not be insane to
believe that eventually war will be over.
And that nuclear power will replace ordinary power.
And that is exactly what happened.
So it could happen again.
After using the power that is given in anger.
It may never be used again not in anger but in peace.
And everything has it downside.It is the slipppery slope.
And sometimes allowing something does not mean the slippery
slope.
Sometimes things get better and not worse.
And that is the opposite to Murphys law.
And we cannot live our lives by Murphys law or we would always be
afraid.
That is what the law on non contradiction causes in me.
Fear of what it means to have exceptions.
But there have always been exceptions.
and there always will be one exception that is the big bang.
It can never be worked out as Einstein said that it could be with
on contraiction mathematics.
It takes a new kind of math QUANTUM STRANGENESS.
To work out the big bang.
If time can travel backwards and entropy be reversed then the big
bang can make sense.
If four states of matter being one means four forces are also
one.
The energy can be released on a grand scale.
Four particles A B X Y can be four states of identical particles.
and they can be one STATE and the four particles can be in the
SAME POSITION at the SAME TIME.
And this is the key to unlimited energy.
And you don't have to believe me ADOPT A PHYSIST.
That is what Iam doing.
And he will tell me to go back to the drawing board.
But in trying to prove me wrong he will prove me right.
And I will have plenty to talk about.
Because adopting a physics professor for collaboration was the
best move ever.
There is no answer to how much I have to want to be free.
Because if I believe writing is a curse.
Then I have to want to be free.
And everyone believes writing is no curse.
But what about a blessing I have yet to see any blessing from my
writing.
And it is obvious that it is no blessing.
Because it is plain that the fruit is bad.
And yet I continue to make a blog.
Because I hope in vain for something to happen.
That is positive.
And everything seems to be negative.
And all things come to those who wait.
One day I will be happy that I kept writing.
Because I could be afraid of all the possibilities.
Like a poisoned pie.
You can't believe God would make a poisoned pie.
And I do not believe that.
And the truth is I do believe God is the author of a poisoned
pie.
Because everything I believe affects me.And believing God is the
author of a pie that is poisoned.
Really makes it hard for God to reach me.
And it isn't the case.That it is hard for God to reach me.
And it really is true that He is trying hard.
To get me to believe the pie is not poison.
Because if anyone can eat the pie and not be hurt.
Then it is not poison.
But of course I explain the way of 666.
And I explain how to believe otherwise.
And of course I make it very difficult to believe otherwise.
But that is because it is difficult to prove 666 wrong.
With mathematics.
Because it is easy to prove it wrong with logic.
And that is what I will do right now.
I will prove 666 wrong with logic.
It is logical to do the opposite of what Jesus sais.
If Jesus sais 12+12=24 is right then 21+21=42 must be right.
And that is the logic of the blaphemers.
They simply have to choose 42 as there answer rather than six
fours.
If Jesus had said 42 was the answer they would choose 24.
And it is obvious that Jesus did not say anything.And of course
it is all in my mind.And I may have darkenes instead of light.
That is the whole question have I blasphemed the Holy Spirit by
talking about why Einstein is wrong.
And I might have done that if Einstein was God.
And of course he is not.
So I can prove him wrong without proving God wrong.
And maybe I can't prove Einstein wrong without proving God wrong.
Then If Iam really proving God wrong in my book Einstein Proved
Wrong.
Then it is a poisoned pie.
But if the purpose is to prove God right.
Then the pie is not poisoned.
And I don't know if my purpose is to prove God right or the law
of non contradiction wrong.
And that is just it if it is my purpose to prove non
contradiction wrong.
Then Iam proving all truth wrong.
And If I argue the big bang contradicts the law of non
contradiction.
Then I doing God a big favour.
And I might think so.But God doesn't need any favours.
And He would love one.
He would love it if I decided that ex-nihilo creation means
matter was never in the same state at the same time in the same
place.
That opposite particles cannot be in the same state and place at
the same time.
And this would really rot your socks if you were with reasons to
believe.
Because the big bang is mathematically impossible.
Unless we allow the creation equation.
And it is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
And it is a contradiction according to my enemies.
But if they are right it proves the big bang wrong.
Because that is a good purpose for a creation equation.
But if the big bang is right.
Then a whole new branch of contradictory math must be created to
allow identical particles to exist in the same state at the same
time in teh same place.
And that would not prove the big bang right.
It would mean it is not part of the set of truth.
IT would mean it is a lie.
And that is close to the truth.
Because the thoery that everything was once one.
Cannot be true if the law of non contradiction always holds.
The reason why the pie may be poison.
Is many good christians believe both the law of non contradiction
and the big bang.
And if one is not true then the other will still be true.
And sadly they will choose to believe non contradiction does not
always apply.
That makes my computer program poison.
Because it attempts to unify everything with my equation and
2+2=4.
And maybe 2+2=4 is the real saver.
Becasue the four forces can be four.
And they can if they are two forces plus two forces.
And that is what Iam explaining with non contradiction.
Because if forces are two they are not contradictory.
They are only contradictory when they are one.
Everything cannot be one they way God is one.
And if the equation attempts to make creation the same as the
creator.
Then it is a pot of poison.
But it is not clear in my book that the creation equation is a
means of proving creation cannot be a big bang.
If the big bang is 2+2=4 then it can still have occured.
Only in this way can the law of non contradiction be right.
But what if 2+2=4 is not adequate.
WHat if you can't explain the equations by adding them 2+2=4.
Because if the unviverse was once 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4
FORCE/STATE.
Then all equations should add up 2+2=4.
And Einsetins equatin doesn't.
Even though I have tried hard to prove why it can be 2+2=4.
Scientists would say it is fundamentally not a 2+2=4 equation.
And that is just it if I can come up with a theory of everything
that is 2+2=4.
The Hawking is a cosmic con artist.
And it does not follow from the conclusion.
And it really does follow.
Hawking believes you can prove anything with math.
And it will still be right.
But that is seperating the real world from the math.
And I can prove everything with the math.
I can prove Einsteins unified field theory.
At least in my delusions of grandeur I can prove it.
But I have never looked at the math of Godel.
Yet I claim his theory begins with a non contradictory big bang.
And leads to a contradictory black hole.
And this as good as what Hawking does.
And of course he checks the math first.
BUt I have come with the idea so Hawking can check the math.
If the the big bang is non contradictory in another universe.
That means it is contradictory in ours.
And maybe that is a recipie for disaster.
But time will not go backward in our universe.
And it will at the begining.
That is a new theory that Godel is right for the begining of our
unviverse.
And it sounds good and it was right off the top of my head.
Because it is good enough to loose my head.
Because the math can be understood to prove the big bang wrong.
Because the above should be true if the big bang is a
contradiction.
But if the opposite of a black hole in a Godel universe is non
contradiction maths.
Then that math should prove the big bang right.
But if it does not then it may prove exnihilo.
But exnihilo has never been combined with an old universe.
And if it were combined it would prove science right.
And religion right.
It would prove both wrong.And of course we don't know what it
woud prove.
But maybe we would be better off with a big bang.
Than ex-nihilo that argues evolution is right.
It is hard to argue evolution is wrong if the earth is old.
And that isn't true.
And it might not be the premise that everything exists without
cause.
Is a premise that is inadeqaute.
It is a God of inadequacy.
When evolution is put togther with ID.
Both are an adequate cause.
And they may be if ex-nihilo creation were combined with an old
earth.
But that would an an inadequate explaination of the origin of the
earth.
And only if everything had to be created all at once.
Maybe seven days means it took time for creation to take place.
And that is happened according to the laws of physics chemistry
and biology.
With a helping hand from ID.
Id is an excellent helping hand for evolution.
Without ID evolution cannot explain anything.
But with ID evolution can explain everything.
And that could be a suspect pie.
Because we are saying God lied about the creation of the
universe.
And of course we are not saying that we are saying Lord help us
to explain how you created everything.
Without saying you did it by chance.
And that is the pie of ill repute.
My universal program which gives rise to space and time.
Maybe it is terrific.
To be able to prove order within randomness.
or maybe it is just a way of arguing there is no God.
There has to be order within randomness so mankind will have a
choce whether to have faith or not.
Philosophy and creation science can never approach God.
And they cannot reach God without faith.
That is the four spiritual laws.
And If I were lost I would love them.
But because Iam found I don't regard them highly.
And it is the opposite if I were lost I would not regard the four
spiritual laws highly.
They are too simple an explaination for life the universe and
everything.
And Jesus explaination is 3*4.
Three laws about four spiritual laws.
And they are MAKE NO GRAVEN IMAGE.Because God can be random.
He can be an image that is random.
And God is never happy with graven images.
Graven images can be mathematical equations for God.
And that is exactly it making God one with everything is a graven
image.
And God is one with everything.
And only for the Buddhists.
Every single thing on earth is distinct and in kinds.
And there are kinds of all phenomonon.
And that includes things like states and forces.
They are never one but always kinds.
That means everything has never be one.
Everything has always been at least four states and four kinds of
forces.
That is the four laws for cosmology.
The fact that there are four laws for the universe.
Means there are four laws for everything.
And that might be 12 because there are three laws.
Of four.
And that is the total of all knowledge.
To understand what it means that three times four is equal to 12.
And maybe it just like 42.
Just an answer you give when you don't know.
But God does know.
So the answer he gives is not a contradiction.
And three fours is not contradictory any more than two sixs.
2+2=4 is equal to 12+12=24.
And that is the basis of the early univese.
It is simply not what they say it is.
And there equations are no better than 42.
Because that is actually the answer they are giving.
But am I trusting someone I love.
I believe so.
Someone I love would not poison me.
And If Iam poisoned by someone I love.
Then it my fault for trusting a little bit too much.
You can find the answers in my next book.
And I hope so that the starwriter will get many years of use.
Because it is an excellent tool for writing the truth.
And if I told lies I would say it is perfect.
But it is just a machine that makes it easy to write.
And you just would never get around to writing as much as you
will write on this machine.
The equation for acceleration is intitial speed- final
speed/time.
And it is 2.
Because then you can add Speed= Distance/time.
If you make that two as well.
And then you have an equation for the speed of deceleration.
And exactly what is the speed of the deceleration of light in the
mirror chamber.
If is faster than C.
And it may faster than any speed.
Because light declerates very fast.
The speed of decleration is not as fast as the speed of the
acceleration of light.
And it may be very fast but not quite as fast as that.
Light takes 0 time to acclerate.
And that cannot be true since it proves absolute time.
So it must take a little time to accelerate.
And we can measure extremely small times.
And maybe we can't measure how small the time is for light to
accelerate.
But we can measure the decleration of light.And estimate how fast
it accelerates.
But all of this doesn't make sense because I have added two
equations 2+2=4.
And acceleration and speed are two different things.
But if they are the same.
Then what is speed.?
It is something similar to accleration but not quite the same
thing.
What will happen if we add 1/3 ACCELERATION+ 1/3 SPEED+ 1/3
SPEED= 1 ACCELERATION SPEED.
And that will make everything right.
Making two things one.
And totally everything is wrong when speed and acceleration are
the same thing.
Because Einsetins theory not longer applies to speed and
acceleration togther.
We have a new theory that is what we will say.
Because we will say the speed of decleration is greater than C.
And then E=MCsquared not longer applies to gravity waves.Because
the speed of accleration of gravity waves is greater than the
speed of light.And maybe this makes no sense maybe it still means
gravity has to travel at C.
Then Einstien isn't wrong.
But maybe Einstein needs a better theory.
So he has one.
If Iam Einstein then I have a better theory the speed of
acceleration of light is always going to be greater than the
speed of light.
So acceleration is greater than speed.
And that is a terrific law.
Only accleration can never be expressed as speed.
And of course light travels a distance the size of the universe
when it reflected to infinity.
So time is expressed in light years.
And this is divided by the speed of light.
To get acceleration.
And a similar rule will give us decleration.
But when we add the equations 2+2=4.
We get speed of decleration.
And that means information travels at a speed when it transmitted
on declerating light.
And the speed is greater than C.
And if they would only listen they would have a new operating
system for windows.
Where information travelled at a maximum speed of infinity.
And speed means Boyles law is obsolete.
But the law of too much information means that will never build
the new operating system.
And that is a shame so information revolution means information
overload.
They simply can't keep advancing the speed of information.
Because of C.
Unless they can make speed and decleration of light one.
They can never beat Boyles law.
And you are reading it and you think you understand why Iam
wrong.So email me at aircloud@bigpond.net.au
And tell me why information can never travel faster than light.
It may be that you are right.
That information cannot be transmitted on declerating light
beams.
Or accelerating.
If that is so information must always be limited to C.
So boyles law must always apply.
If you have enjoyed adding newtons laws for speed and
acceleration.
Then you will love adding Einsteins equations for speed and
accleration.
Does Einstein approach an explaination of information sent at
faster than the speed of light.?
And his equations for speed and acceleration added 2+2=4.
Or in 1/3s.
Will give an answer to the problem of time.
Does information travel faster than light without going back in
time.?
At the quantum level it does go back in time.
But information is more than quantum.
It is classical and maybe in classical theory information cannot
go faster than light.
We will succeed where others have failed.
This is always the way to fail because others have failed to
prove Einstein wrong for a reason.
And the reason is information cannot travel faster than light.
But let us suspend disbelief for a moment what If information can
travel faster than light.
The the speed of the deceleration of information is faster than
light.
How do I prove Jeffreys wrong.
By measurement it is not an experiment unless you do your own
measurement.
You have to measure the speed of decleration in the mirror
chamber with 2+2=4.
And you find the answer is a bit like adding 2 FORCE+ 2 STATE= 4
FORCE/STATE.
Maybe the equations are interchangeable.
And of course they are goobledegook.
But the idea of 2+2=4 is the most basic of ideas it is not
goobledegook.
It means two ideas can be combined without contradiction.
But we could add 1/3 SPEED C+ 1/3 DECELEATION C+ 1/3 DECELERATION
C= 1 SPEED/DECLERATION.
No one can measure the decleration of light in the mirros
chamber.
And anyone can it takes a bright mind to do so and some very
powerful computers.
And it only takes a five year old with matlab....
So maybe the speed of decleration of light has not been measured
because scientists have not bothered to measure it.
I keep saying hey measure it.
But they say no they won't.
It is a bit like Bruce Almighty they have free will...
So if they ever choose to believe my book they might measure the
speed of the decleration of light.
And see if they can measure information travelling faster than
light.
In a round about way I have described why EInstein would be wrong
if he was wrong but have only proved him right.
The distance travelled by light when it is reflected ot infinity
approaches zero brilliance at infinity.
But never reaches it.
If light were to reach zero.
The explansion of the universe would be at the speed of light.
This proves Einsetin is right.
Because the expansion of the universe can never exceed the speed
of light.
However the universe can be accelerating faster than C.
And what affect would this have on the zero value for the
distance light travels.?
Superheated supercritical non newtonian fluid.
And it is another state.
And it really might be another state to be boiling.
But it is even more of a new state.
But it is not quite plasma.
If it were possible to change a supercritical non newtonian fluid
to plasma.
It would be four states in one.
And it would in theory.
But perhaps supercritical non newtonian fluid cannot exist as a
plasma.
But if we can imagine that it can.
Then we have four forces unified.
And that is the thoery that unifiying the four forces is simply a
matter of unifying the four states.
And if they are totally indendant then you have to unify the four
forces some other way.
And they don't have to be unified.And they do for Einstein to be
right.
That is why we should try to unify them by unifying the four
states.
Four forces can be two forces when matter is two states.
If this is true it simplifys the idea.
There is a direct relationship between forces and the states of
matter.
Even if there is no direct relationship four forces must be one
in the big bang.
And they must be two.
That is 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4 FORCE/STATES.
And it is probably true that making four one.
Is possible but not in the universe.
Creation exnihilo is the alternative of 2+2=4.
and that is possible that it really could be the big bang.
But if the big bang were not one force and were two.
It would be different.
And the ultimate particle for 2+2=4 is the photon not the gluon.
Since photons can be in the same state and place at the same
time.
So thye ultimate particle we are looking for is not solid light.
It is light in a state between states.
And if atoms are made up of solid photons.
Then that is solid light.
And maybe everything begins with photons.
And that is a wild guess.
But like one of spocks guesses it is better than some peoples
calculations.
And we can test it in the accelerator.
And we most certainly can try to find out if atoms are ultimately
made up of photons.
I like it because it is my thoery.
That is what a six year old would say.
I have to say I like it because it fits the data.
It fits the data from Genesis.
Maybe photons are the binding force of the atoms.
And that should be easy to test.
But sometimes like with strings the ultimate particle cannot be
detected with instruments.
But a photon rather than a string would be a totally different
theory.
Matter must be photon like in the big bang.
And that is totally true.
Matter must behave like photons in a stateless way.A maybe a
photon could vibrate at a frequency.
There I have unified string theory and photon theory for the
first time.
If we could imagine a string of light.
Maybe we would be cooking with plutonium.
And I just don't have the answers.
I could say that or I could speculate.
You might as well have two bob each way.
And that is what a lot of people do.
But I choose a rough horse and put the house on.
That is what Hawking sais to do.
And that is the way he plays science.
He bets on improbability.
But it is a good bet the universe is probably stanger than we
imagine it to be.
E=Mcsquared= 2 H+ 2 H + E= 4 H+E
And H is mass the mass of two hyrdgogen atoms.
And mass is equal to atomic weight for hydrogen.
And dont quote me.
Because it is true Iam certain.
E=mc squared= 2 M+ 2M+ E= 4 M+E.
And this is the test of Einsteins equation can you make
E=MCsquared equal to 2+2=4.
If both equations are equal then fission is equal to fusion.
That means the matter that is lost in fission is equal to energy
produced.
And the amount of matter gained in fusion is equal to the energy.
If they can be equal then Einsetin is right.
Matter can be equal to energy and not just mass.
The equations do not equal.
Is what you might say.
You might say E=MCsquared can never be expressed as 2+2=4 because
C cannot be 2.
And if fission can never equal fusion for energy produced and
more is produced by fusion.
The Einstein is wrong about equivalence.
There are two transformations of matter to energy and they are
both not equal to each other.
And that is just balderdash.
And maybe it really isn't because maybe energy and mass are not
equal to energy and mass.
And that is rubbish.
But the possibility that a new energy can be derived from four
states of matter being one.
And foru forces being one.
May mean the fusion and fission are two different things.
And of course they are a hydrogen bomb is not a putonium bomb.
And they are both plutonium bombs.
But it depends on how you phrase a question to the answer that
you get.
And I will bet they will prove Einstein right.
That 2+2=4 can be E=MCsquared.
And that fisson and fusion can be one.
That is it I really don't have anything else to talk about.
And I have decleration.
And I have explained that fully.
And decleration is newtons equation.
For acceleration reversed.
And it might not even be the same equation.
But if we add Newtons equation for decleration to Newtons
equation for speed.
We get the speed of decleration.
And it is equal to Pi squared multiplied 186,000 m/s squared.
And there is no reason that instantaenous doesn't take a little
time.
Pi squared multiplied by 186,000 squared is the fastest speed we
can imagine.
And it maybe the limit for deceleration.
Nothing can decelerate faster than light.
And light can.
Light can declerate faster than light.
So what is the point.
We can transmit information on declerating light.
And maybe we cannot use declerating light for information.
But if we can the speed of the information will be faster than C.
And we be travelling between two mirrors an infinite distance.
The distance is virtual.
And it is more than that it is a physical distance measured by
the loss of energy of light.
And maybe it is a simulator for the real world where light
travels a finite distance.
But you can't round off infinity.
And you really can make finity rational.
Because infinity is always rational.And it never is.
That is the whole point.
If an infinite distance is a rational distance time is absolute.
And if time is absolute anything can travel faster than light.
And only information can.
And of course I have talked about all this before.
So I must be finished.
And there always comes a point where the work is finished.
And maybe I want to finish with four forces thatare one and four
states that are one.
That is a good place to finish.
Because you have you choice of believing the big bang or
exnihilo.
And it on the basis of the test for truth.
And if the test for truth is wrong then the big bang is right.
But if the test for truth is not wrong that it happened
differenty to what they say.
We can say that it must be non contradictory to be a sound
theory.
And that is all we can say since ex-nihilo is not really a
theory.
If it were a theory we could compare it to the big bang and find
one right and the other wrong.
But maybe they are both right and the big bang mathematics must
be non contradictory.
Then 2+2=4 must be right for forces and states.
Because that is non contradictory.
But 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE is
something the scientists do not agree about.
If it is the equation for the big bang.
Then it fails the truth test.
And if it is the equation for ex-nihilo then it doesn't fail the
truth test because something out of nothing is a contradiction.
In terms.
And that is what the contradiction is all about it is
acontradcition of terms.
Terms like space time and state and place.
Particles can exist in the same place even if they are identical.
And they cannot exist in the same time and state.
And I have said this before but it has become the total sum of
all knowledge.
And it might be just that I might know myself that I will choose
something else if God sais 2+2=4.
SO if the truth proves 2+2=4.
I would choose to believe the other equation.
But the truth sais the other equation is right and not 2+2=4.
And maybe that is a lie.
Because arguing against 2+2=4 isn't logical.
And that is the whole point of my books.
You can have a 2+2=4 theory of everything.
One that does add up.
But you cannot have a contradictory theory of everything.
And of course you can.
People disagree about whether the law of non contradiction is
true.
And they will always disagree.
But I should agree that the evidence is in favour of the law.
And I have not looked at the evidence.
And that is what I must do.
Before deciding the big bang is false.
I must be sure the law always holds in every circumstance.
That there are no exceptions.
And there ar eno laws like that.
Even gravity can have an exception.
SO the big bang is an exception to a law that holds true
otherwise.
That is if this equation is right 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3
ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
The non contradictory equation is 2 APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4
APPLE/ORANGE.
This could work for the big bang or ex-nihilo.
The maths is simple non contradiction maths.
So the theory has to agree with this law to be valid.
And no one will agree with that.
The hope that I have is that everyone will enjoy what I have
done.And that is because I have saved the starwriter one more
time.
So I can finish what I have started.
And make a dos file.
Because this starwriter can make a dos disc that can save dos
files.
And then I can open them.
And maybe I can open them with XP.
Then I can put them on a blog.
And everyone will say what a great blog.
And nobody ever sais that.
A blog is a blog that is my philosophy.
And it is not very good because there are blogs and there are
blogs.
And it is a great blog.
That is my conclusion and now I will make the dos file.
Posted by STEVE at 5:42 AM 0 comments
Monday, March 31, 2008
TWO FOR THE MONEY AND THREE FOR THE SHOW
Dear Roddy,
A blackboard is the modern version of a cave wall.
And I have a way to make a blackboard for the creation science museum.
The exhibit should be called teaching the controversy.
One black board should be 1/3 FERMI DIRAC EQUATION+ 1/3 BOSE EINSTEIN EQUATION+ 1/3 BOSE EINSTEIN EQUATION= 1 BOSE EINSTEIN/FERMI/DIRAC EQUATION.
1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
And you can fill a blackboard with 100's of equations from various physical theories added in 1/3s.
1/3 100+ 1/3 100+ 1/3 100 equations= 1 100 /100= 1 EQUATION.
You can get one equation from 100.
Or even use thousands or millions of equations and reduce them to one.
X and Y are in the SAME PLACE at the SAME TIME in the SAME STATE with this equation contrary to the law of non contradiction.
EX-NIHILO is the other blackboard.
And we add equations 2APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4 APPLE/ORANGE this is according to the rules of non contradiction.
And the equations do not balance just like the equation for the unvierse it's energy doesn't balance for ex-nihilo energy must be gotten from outside the universe to balance the equation..
We can add 2000+2000=4000 4000/1000= 2+2-4.
To reduce 2000 equations to one equation of 2+2=4.
We could have a third blackboard in the middle where we try to put the two blackboards togther.
This is simple easy to do and is all about the cave man instinct to draw on a cave wall.
These simple equations can become very complex and give us the answers that we need.
I assume being a creationist that they will prove the law of non contradiction as the basis for all truth and creation ex-nihilo rather than proving Einstein right.
Reread the above until you get it it is not obvious at first if you ar enot used to using simple math to solve physics problems.
Steve A Jeffrey
----- Original Message -----
Posted by STEVE at 8:33 PM 1 comments
THE CAVE PAINTING
This is like the past being resurrected.
Iam totally in the past.
And Iam at the same time in the present and it a little
uncomfortable.
Because it brings back many memories.
And it should bring back everything.
That is not good.
But it does have to be that way.
Even though I want to get rid of the past.
I can learn by my mistakes.
And hold on to what is good.
Everything I have written on this starwriter has been good.
And I began with writing with speaking.
And that was a terrific begining.
I proved I could write until I got distracted by something else.
And that is why I use the starwriter Iam not distracted.
I can take a memo about the days activities.
If I want to.
And it should always be that way.
I shouldn't have to write about every day.
And find something interesting in a boring day.
But I can do that and that what a writer does writes about his
day.
And of course a writer has something to write about.
And I have My Science Thesis.
And it will never be finished.
And maybe that should be the case that it not finished until the
fat lady sings.
I can always write another blog.
And maybe I won't bother.
But If Iam making progress why stop.
Maybe one day someone will read everything I have written and
continue my work.
And that would be pointless.
And there is always a point.
A point that they falied me because I was too clever and maybe I
wanted to get out of work.
And that is always the reason you are failed.
And sometims it is because you are too stupid.
But not in this case.
They failed me for having faith.
Faith in my work which they wanted to show was not good.
And that is obvious now.
That everybody hates my work.
That they never give credit where credit is due.
They are simply monsters that you would fear if you were young.
And people do fear them.
But I just give them as good as they get.
Because they never understand why I am not hurt.
Because they are certain their words hurt.
And people like that are unusual.At least they were.
But they seem to love the Hawking forum.
So there is something very bad about it.
Maybe it is Hawking himself he is not a christian.
And yet he pretends to believe.
For science sake.
And for religions sake he pretends not to believe.
So he really is a pretender.
And so the forum is a place where people pretend to be someone
else.
And Iam better off without it.
That is what I would say if I allowed it to go back to the way it
was.
They would find someone else to pick on.And maybe that is what I
need to see someone else in my shoes.
And to no longer allow these people to mess with me.
Because they are messing with my head.
And they really are pretending to be messing with my head.
Because they don't understand pschatry is meant to heal.
Whatever Tom Cruise might say they have healed me.
And they have helped when I needed help.
So I should not hate them.
They can't put the devil down as the cause it has be rational.
Like all science we can't put the devil down as the cause of
Einstein.
When he may be one of the factors.
Einsetin could never hold down a job and he could so chances are
he wasn't insane.
But that doesn't mean he got all his ideas from God.
His God was spinozas and that is just an evil spirit.
So you have got to watch out what your God is.
If it is Einstein it is spinozas God and it is a God of
contradiction.
And contradiction always is a sign of something missing.
There is something missing from Einsteins theory.
And he knew and was looking for it.
And Iam humble enough to say I have not found it.
But that Einstein has given me the clue.
What if my answer is just an misunderstanding.
Then it is my misunderstanding.
And it is a good one.
Because to misunderstand Einstein is to understand him.
I could write a hundred blogs and I could combine them all into
one.
And it would all be on one disc.
That is the beauty of this machine.
It is the ultimate in tools for writing.
There is nothing like this machine to make a blog.And a blog can
become a book.
But it is likely to remain a blog.
And there is no reason I can't learn to use the software.ANd if I
could I would but I can't so I won't.
It is way too expensive to hire someone to upload the book.
But maybe if I had the photos I could easily upload a new book.
So I will probably never put the book on LULU.
Because it just can work to put it on LULU.
Then it can be the longest book ever.
And it can be called MY RESEARCH.
1999-2008.
And that is a good title.
But no title is necessary for a blog.
It can just be BLOG CONTINUED.ANd BLOG A B C D E F G.
ANd it can be ALPHA NUMERICAL it can be blog A 1 A 2 A 3.
And that is perfect.
Because Iam always in search of the perfect title.
So Thomas's Blog A 1.
That is what I will call this Blog Richard Thomas Blog A1.
And if you have heard of an Einstein named Richard Thomas then I
have managed to shake my past.
And everyone should have the right to make a new start.
Wit a new name somewhere else that no one has ever heard of them.
And no one wants that.
And it is a great blessing to no longer fear what my name has
meant.
Because it has meant things to me that were not pleasant.
It has meant a fight to be accepted.
And a fight to not be rejected.
And all of that is in the past.
Because Iam Richard Thomas and Iam Johnboy the writer.
And I will always be a famous writer.
But no one will ever know who Iam.
And that is the way I like it.And that is the way everybody likes
it.When they know what fame is like.
It is awful.
To be well known.
And it really hard on those you love.
That is why I shall remain annonymous.
Because people want to hurt me with their words.
They know their words hurt.
And they know that Iam am reacting to their words.
Because they are looking for a reaction that means they have hurt
me.
And how crazy is that even a lunatic would not expect people to
be hurt by what they said.
And that is why Iam sane and they are not.
Because I don't set out to hurt people with my words I set out
tohelp them.
And If I fail I may hurt them badly.
And I know that.
And I seldom care.
But that is not the same as setting out to destroy others.
And it careless and being careless with words can hurt people a
lot.
No one is perfect in speech.
And Iam not.
My gifts are imperfect.
But If I continue to use them in faith Iam using what I have been
given to do good for all.
And the good of all means doing everything I can to help people.
But not to th extent that I give away my gift.
Because I need my tool to use my gift.
And a writer does not give away his tool.
Unless he is finished.
And that can always be the case for others but I will always have
something more to say like Asimov.
And Asimov has nothing more to say.
So Iam like him.
And Iam not I have plenty more where that came from.
The future is just one long book and I have to fill in hours and
hours when I have nothing to do.
That is because I don't work and I have choosen this lifestyle.
It is not bad to not work.
But you have to fill in a lot of time.
So there a lot of things I can be doing rather than sitting here
feeling sorry for myself.
I don't expect the blasphermers to understand to them their job
is their life.
Work is power and knowledge means work.
or information means work.
And they will succeed because satan helps them.
But I will succeed too because God helps me.
And he is helping me to be healed right now.
So that the guy I was becoming at Redcliffe will be the guy Iam
now.
Because I was taking all the right steps towards a new life.
But I had some very serious problems.
And they are going to be comletely taken care of.
And I will start my new life today.
Because isaac means new life.
And he means a new covenant.
And God has made a new covenant with me.
To be my special friend and never let anything come between us.
So it is back to the future.
And it is forwards to the future.
And if I really set ut to make progress on proving Einstein wrong
I really could prove him wrong.
And was not always true I didn't understand why he was wrong.
But now I do it is as simple as 2+2=4.
2+2=4 can't apply to the big bang but it does apply to creation
ex-nihilo.
And that is the test of rationality.
The law of non contradiction can't apply to the big bang.
And it can apply to creation ex-nihilo.
And it is very good.
People can argue endlessly about it.
And it will prove nothing in particular.
Because they will believe whatever they want to.
And they won't worry if the big bang doesn't make sense.
In fact to them a balanced equation always makes sense.
But Iam saying unbalanced equations like 2+2=4 are rational.
And the expression 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1
APPLE/ORANGE is irrational.
Just like the big bang itslef all laws of physics break down.
And maybe not quantum mechanics.
And maybe even that.
It is another way of saying it can't happen just as an explosion.
There is more to it.
Then a big explosion.
But noone will ever doubt the third equation.
Because it just that kind of thing that makes me mad.
If someone comes up with something that does not make sense
everybody sais it is right.
But when you say add equations 2+2=4 evereybody sais it is wrong.
And that doesn't make any sense.
But it shows people are biased towards evolution.
They want the cosmos to evolve.
And that means it must change form.
So the idea of beginning with an opposite universe one that is
Godel suits evolution fine.
You get a non contradictory explosion because the big crunch is a
contradictory universe.
So that is the mechanism.
That is what people wanted of God to prove the Buddhist right and
make me one with everything.
And God just isn't one with everything.
The laws that apply to heaven don't apply on earth.
God may be three persons in one.
That does mean three equations that are different can be one.
And of course it does.
But six is mans number.
And seven is Gods number.
And put them together and you get 42.
And that is mans numbers and Gods numbers together.
And it is the worst possible thing.
And that is the way to understand it you cannot make anything in
Gods image.
Not even a theory.
And the big bang is a theory in Gods image.
And it must be incorrect or God would not have said ex-nihilo.
Because what went before was nothing.
And what went before the big bang must have been the big crunch..
If you can't decide then you are not alone.
Multitudes won't be able to decide between the two theories.
But that means they will keep an open mind to ex-nihilo.
And maybe that is better than deciding.
And teachers will teach the controversy and there is no sign of
that happening.
But maybe one day after Iam dead they will make me a saint.
At least in science.
And then everyone will learn my theories in school.
And that would be a good end except I wouldn't be there to see
it.
So that would not be so great.
But that is all the other great scientists got.
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve A Jeffrey
To: rouse@maths.ox.ac.uk
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:05 PM
Subject: ROGER
A way of proving the human brain chalk and a blackboard is superior to a computer mathematica.
Or a supercomputer.
Posted by STEVE at 8:30 PM 0 comments
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
* ▼ 2010 (2)
o ▼ May (1)
+ The Four Spiritual Laws - Flash
o ► April (1)
+ TRANSLATION
* ► 2008 (4)
o ► March (2)
+ TWO FOR THE MONEY AND THREE FOR THE SHOW
+ THE CAVE PAINTING
o ► January (2)
+ OMEGA
+ TO HOWARD WISEMAN
* ► 2007 (48)
o ► December (2)
+ LAST 20 PAGES OF IN THE SHADOW OF 9/11.
+ RAWHIDE
o ► November (1)
+ PI OPENS DOORS
o ► October (7)
+ BIG BANG COMPUTER SIMULATOR
+ DOCTORED RAT PI
+ SCIENCE TEN ACCOMPLISHMENTS STEVE A JEFFREY
+ HOW TO GROW HAIR ON A BALD HEAD.
+ SCRIPT FOR RADIO STATION INTERVIEW
+ THEORIES OF LIFE THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING.
+ TIME TRAVEL FILMS
o ► September (13)
+ OPEN LETTER TO BRAD CARTER USQ ABOUT THE SUN.
+ OPENN LETTER TO LOS ALAMOS AND BRYAN GREENE
+ OPEN LETTER TO BRYAN GREENE
+ OPEN LETTER TO LOS ALAMOS ABOUT A BETTER ATOMIC BO...
+ I SAW A UFO AND NOBODY BELIEVES ME.
+ STEVES BAD MUSIC BLOG.
+ OLD EXAMINATION RULE-LISTEN TO THE QUESTION
+ LARGE SPACE TELESCOPE-LST
+ THE PERFECT WILL OF GOD-YOU CAN"T HANDLE THE TRUTH...
+ THE LOST IN SPACE ROBOT WISDOM FROM
+ ASTROLOGY THE PROGRAM
+ THE ICING ON A PINEAPPLE UPSIDE DOWN CAKE AND COC...
+ THE HANDSHAKE EQUATION FOR THE BIG BANG
o ► August (25)
+ MANHATTAN PROJECT 2-SPLIT THE ATOM AND YOU GET 2
+ JAVA BIBLE CLOCK
+ NOT SCHRODENGERS CAT
+ EINSTEIN ON TRIAL
+ MECHANISM FOR THE BIG BANG
+ THE BIG BANG-PINOCCHIO A WOODEN BOY.
+ THE BEGINING- NON CONTADICTION
+ SEVEN DEADLY SINS
+ THE MYTHMAKERS AND THE RISKTAKERS.
+ PROGRAM FOR SUPERCOMPUTER
+ TEN LAWS OF CREATION SCIENCE
+ THE JESUS ANTHOLOGY-SUPERMAX
+ STRING THEORIES ARE RIDICULOUS 4#
+ 10 LAWS OF NON CONTRADICTION-AGREED VALUE
+ THE REPEATING VALUE OF PI
+ DOC BROWNS EXPERIMENT TO CHANGE HISTORY
+ DOC BROWNS KEY IS UNDER THE MAT
+ EINSTEINS' POLTEGEIST.
+ EINSTEIN PROVED WRONG BY SUPER STRING THEORY.
+ STRING THEORIES ARE RIDICULOUS 3.
+ TO ABRIDGE ETERNITY
About Me
STEPHEN JEFFREY
View my complete profile
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)